Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Julia.fir

Channel

Julia.fir

@julia_fir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,622subscribers

-129 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001412098307
TypeChannel
Username@julia_fir
DescriptionУютные заметки, дом, декор, рецепты По сотрудничеству @juliafir Канал внесен в реестр Роскомнадзора https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673c8956b7aeb106ce059546&registryType=bloggersPermission
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/julia_fir

Growth

22,62222,75122,686.57 August 2026 — 22,751 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,749 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,740 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,741 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,736 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,730 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,724 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,716 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,703 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,696 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,692 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,693 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,690 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,689 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,681 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,674 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,669 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,660 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,649 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,645 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,642 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,638 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,628 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,625 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,622 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 26 days, net -129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,603–22,770 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 14:3622,622-3
1 Sept 2026, 10:4622,625-3
31 Aug 2026, 10:0422,628-10
30 Aug 2026, 12:4422,638-4
29 Aug 2026, 13:3822,642-3
28 Aug 2026, 12:4622,645-4
27 Aug 2026, 14:0322,649-11
26 Aug 2026, 12:5322,660-9
25 Aug 2026, 12:4822,669-5
24 Aug 2026, 12:2822,674-7
22 Aug 2026, 18:2922,681-8
21 Aug 2026, 05:5822,689-1
20 Aug 2026, 07:4622,690-3
19 Aug 2026, 10:0722,693+1
18 Aug 2026, 07:2322,692-4
17 Aug 2026, 10:1422,696-7
15 Aug 2026, 19:0922,703-13
14 Aug 2026, 08:0922,716-8
13 Aug 2026, 02:3322,724-6
11 Aug 2026, 23:5322,730first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.09%
avg views ÷ 22,622 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held8 (14 June 20261 September 2026)
Views total3,456
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,070
Videos
1,030
Links
75

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 41s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

328 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20963.7%
🎉5115.5%
🥰319.45%
👍195.79%
🔥51.52%
🤩51.52%
🤔41.22%
😁20.61%
👏10.305%
💯10.305%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 328 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
12.5%
1 of 8 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,610
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,170
over 7 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvWVWoM122 August 202622 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC536 views47 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

С 1 сентября! Родителям - сил, а детям - удачи и хорошего учетного года. Для меня это необычное 1 сентября - у меня остались только две школьницы, сын уже в вузе. Очень непривычно

🥰3113🤩3

26 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,310 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Какой у меня самый любимый косметический продукт? Однозначно сыворотка с витамином С. Это действительно рабочий актив, который дает результат. Но сыворотка C-energy от Geltek - это просто королева среди сывороток для меня. Ведь она останавливает образование пигментации и осветляет поверхностную пигментацию, укрепляет защитный барьер кожи и усиливает естественное сияние. Она подходит под любой тип кожи, а в составе 2

14🎉1

22 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,610 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvWVWoMVideo

Пришло время заказывать кухню в нашу новую квартиру. Сначала я посчитала её в двух местах, которые рекомендовала наша дизайнер, цена была очень высокая. Хорошо, что знакомая подсказала зайти в кухни Лавелла Я просто в восторге от уровня мебели, которую они делают. Во-первых, они все берут на себя - от создания модели (это у них бесплатно) и до процесса установки и сборки. Во-вторых, мебель изготавливают под размеры

👍138

29 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC≈2,380 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Красивый и долговечный пол начинается не с укладки первой плашки, а с правильной подготовки пола и изучения рекомендаций производителя. Я Вам уже рассказывала, что для нашей новой квартиры мы выбрали кварц-паркет. Совсем скоро покажу процесс укладки, а пока мы готовим основание под его укладку. Делаем сухую стяжку и наливной пол. Кварц-паркет - относительно новый материал и не все мастера умеют с ним работать. Но п

19👍2💯1

5 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC≈2,770 views44 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Сходили на VK Квартирник. Это такой корпоратив для блогеров. Мне очень понравилась площадка - парк Эрмитаж в Москве и формат - кругом были столы, кресла, пуфики. Все общались, фотографировались. Было много известных людей и блогеров. Концерт был отличный - группы Пицца, Градусы и Uma2rman. Очень повезло с погодой - после ледяных ночей на выпускной сына, здесь была классная теплая ночь. Вот уж точно - начиная вести 4

38👍2🤩2😁2

29 Jun 2026, 10:04 UTC≈2,350 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Помните мы вместе с вами примеряли варианты напольного покрытия в нашей новой квартире? Смотрели образцы кварцпаркета для гостиной. Оказалось,что этого можно было и не делать. На сайте QUARTZ PARQUET есть удобная функция - 3D-подбор пола. Это действительно очень удобно. Загружаешь туда фото своего интерьера и видишь, как разные оттенки и форматы смотрятся прямо в интерьере. Ссылка https://clck.ru/3UM9X5 Всё онлайн

13🤔4

29 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC≈1,800 views89 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ярослав получил аттестат, и теперь он официально закончил школу. Выпускной, как свадьбу, отмечали 2 дня. Вручение было в театре - очень красиво и трогательно все получилось. У сына очень дружный класс, с этим нам повезло, так грустно, что этот период их жизни закончился. Но впереди новый - ответственный этап - поступление. Так хочется, чтобы у сына все получилось

60🎉21🔥5👍2👏1

14 Jun 2026, 06:15 UTC≈2,170 views73 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

У меня сегодня профессиональный праздник. 14 июня - День Блогера🎉 Решение стать блогером было одним из самых правильных в моей жизни. Это и заработок + гибкий график + возможность проводить время с семьей. А еще как блогер я тестирую классные продукты, езжу на обзоры и выставки, общаюсь с людьми, работаю с классными компаниями. Но главный подарок, который дает блог, это Вы - моя аудитория. Спасибо Вам, что смотрит

44🎉29

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @julia_fir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,238,870 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

marinamalinovaya
@marinamalinovaya · 65,674
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
Тренды и Дизайн
@trenddesign · 43,999
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
Irina_andreeva_sad
@irina_andreeva_sad · 37,824
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
ЛЕТНЕЕ УТРО | Letneeutro
@Letneeutro_channel · 48,843
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
yana_sad_19 Огород/Сад/Рецепты
@yana_sad_19 · 90,079
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Julia.fir” (@julia_fir), 22,622 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/julia_fir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.