Дізналася сьогодні новий термін. Знали?
👀17

Channel
@julia_krilyk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,301subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001927500400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @julia_krilyk |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/julia_krilyk |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 1,301 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 1,302 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 1,304 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 1,302 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 1,303 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 1,308 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 1,311 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 1,306 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 1,302 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,303 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 1,305 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 1,305 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
415 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 276 | 66.5% | |
| 🤯 | 64 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 6.51% | |
| 👀 | 17 | 4.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 1.69% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 1.69% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.20% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.20% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 0.964% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.482% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.241% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 415 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дізналася сьогодні новий термін. Знали?
👀17
Привіт! 😊 Якщо вам знайоме постійне невдоволення своїм тілом, самокритика, думки про схуднення або відчуття, що життя почнеться лише тоді, коли ви зміните свою зовнішність, — хочу запросити вас на мій онлайн-інтенсив «12 кроків до здорових стосунків з тілом». Протягом місяця ми крок за кроком будемо працювати над тим, щоб: ✨ зменшити самокритику; ✨ навчитися по-іншому ставитися до свого тіла; ✨ перестати відкладати …
❤7
Нагадування на сьогодні 🌺
❤27
https://t.me/ALittleCareEachDay Доєднуйтеся💜
❤10😍2
Маленьке нагадування 💜
❤34
Можливо хтось може порекомендувати зі свого досвіду в більшій вазі 💜
Вибачте, що не по темі. Дуже актуальне питання для мене. Чи є ендокринологи, які не бояться пацієнтів з вагою ~200 кг? Які не пропонують оземпік або баріартрію не дізнавшись навіть аналізів та не поцікавившись чи є у пацієнта рхп. Вже відчай бере, якщо чесно. В місті взагалі немає спеціалістів. Онлайн прийоми та супровід або задорогі для мого бюджету, або відмовляються дізнавшись вагу.
Мені от цікаво, чи є тут люди, які відео дивляться на швидкості 1.0?) Бо я навіть себе слухати на цій швидкості не можу, здається, що я якась загальмована)) Лише 1.5 😁🙈 Увімкнула курс психіатра і розумію, що я точно не загальмована на відер, а просто що мій мозок вже очікує, що всі люди на відео мають говорити на ×1.5. 😅
😁23❤3
Маленьке нагадування 💜
❤28
Привіт) я сьогодні зняла новий інтенсив «12 кроків до здорових стосунків з тілом» (хто слухав лекцію 10 кроків, то він на основі лекції) Буде десь в середині серпня (можливо раніше, залежно як швидко монтажер змонтує) В інстаграмі в сторіс можна залишити «+», якщо тема актуальна і хочете доєднатися за найнижчою ціною. https://www.instagram.com/stories/julia_krilyk/3935926352824629494?utm_source=ig_story_item_share…
❤15
Але я отримала насолоду 🥰 Хочу якийсь час попрактикувати Через голос, звучання, вібрування теж можна розслабляти нервову систему https://youtu.be/ETeYWBGfiso?si=uSTLoE4t4SaCOaCg Можливо хтось захоче теж спробувати)
❤16❤🔥6
Сьогодні дізналася цікавий факт: близько 2–3% людей не здатні створювати уявні образи в голові — це стан, який називають афантазією. Такі люди не «бачать» подумки картинки, сцени чи обличчя, коли щось уявляють або згадують, хоча можуть знати й описувати це словами без проблем. Наприклад, вони розуміють, як виглядає яблуко або море, але не формують внутрішньої візуальної “картинки”. При цьому пам’ять, логіка та інтел…
❤21👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @julia_krilyk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Розмір грудей?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“До тіла - з турботою, до себе - з добротою” (@julia_krilyk), 1,301 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/julia_krilyk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.