17 measurements spanning 24 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,577–10,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 17:27
10,596
+2
28 Aug 2026, 16:13
10,594
-2
27 Aug 2026, 17:27
10,596
-17
26 Aug 2026, 14:03
10,613
-8
25 Aug 2026, 15:48
10,621
-5
24 Aug 2026, 18:55
10,626
-39
20 Aug 2026, 11:53
10,665
-5
19 Aug 2026, 10:49
10,670
-9
18 Aug 2026, 11:13
10,679
-5
17 Aug 2026, 13:06
10,684
-14
14 Aug 2026, 14:37
10,698
-2
13 Aug 2026, 01:54
10,700
+2
12 Aug 2026, 01:52
10,698
-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:18
10,701
-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:32
10,703
-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:00
10,706
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:59
10,706
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 30 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 10,596 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,770
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
19 (30 July 2025 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
8,840
Reactions total
147
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 43s
Average length
1m 41s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,238 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
589
47.6%
🔥
271
21.9%
😁
187
15.1%
👍
165
13.3%
👎
26
2.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2025 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мой первый AI-ролик
Трек «Аня» от fvnni попался мне в ленте за пару недель до мастер-класса по созданию сниппетов. Поэтому, когда дело дошло до собственной работы, вопрос выбора музыки не стоял.
Первый образ, который пришёл мне при прослушивании, — миниатюрная китайская лапшичная. С него и начал развивать идею и сценарий ролика.
Дальше — генерация локаций и персонажей (Midjourney + GPT Image + Nano Banana), а сам …
Раньше у меня было двоякое отношение к генерациям. С одной стороны, я понимал, что это мощный инструмент, который стремительно занимает свою нишу в индустрии.
С другой — когда я видел ИИ-ролики, то либо сразу их пролистывал, либо, если всё же досматривал, обесценивал с мыслью: насобирали референсов, закинули в нейронку, кнопку нажали — и готово. Хотя головой я и понимал, что на самом деле не всё так просто, лёгкое о…
использую ИИ-инструменты в посте (ротоскоп, апскейл, шумодав, транскрипт), но не генерацию41%
использую для текстов: сценарии, логлайны, описания, письма клиентам40%
только на препродакшене: референсы, аниматики, раскадровки23%
хочу внедрить, но не знаю с чего начать15%
не использую и не планирую5%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как зритель: что вы чувствуете, когда видите ИИ-видео?
уже баннерная слепота, сразу перелистываю31%
если сделано качественно и есть идея — смотрю55%
мне всё равно, важен результат, а не способ18%
хихикаю с нейрослопа16%
категорически против11%
жду восстания машин12%
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Давно хотел спросить: как вы относитесь к ИИ-видео? Хочу понять, как сейчас у коллег, — я немного выпал, варюсь в основном в трейлерах. А там из ИИ-инструментов я использую только чистку синхронов от музыки.
Разделил на два опроса. Первый — про отношение как зрителя: что вы чувствуете, когда видите такой ролик в ленте. Второй — про работу: что вы реально используете.
В обоих можно отмечать несколько вариантов.
Спа…
Всем здрасьте, а вот и я!
Возвращаюсь после длительного молчания... Ну как возвращаюсь — скорее пришёл ответить на вопрос из комментариев:
че не постишь...
Рассказываю.
Перед Новым годом мы завели щенка бордер-колли. Жизнь разделилась на до и после) Это не первая моя собака, и я понимал, что такое активный щенок (до этого у меня был джек-рассел). Но ожидания с реальностью не совпали, и этот чёрно-белый комок дал …
Друзья, с наступающим 2026 годом! Будьте собой, делайте то, что нравится, а что не нравится — не делайте. Классного вам года, пусть всё получается! Обнял.
Ребят, кто брал футболки, как они себя показали в носке спустя 1,5 года? Очень интересна ваша обратная связь. Можно в коменты, можно в обратку @hellojumpcut_bot
Спасибо
Сегодня у меня день рождения и 8️⃣ лет каналу JumpCut
Год получился тихим: писал сюда редко. Работа и житейские заботы часто отодвигали посты на потом, а позже уже пропадал запал что-либо рассказывать. Такой сейчас период — не обессудьте.
Если вы недавно здесь, рекомендую пройтись по хештегам в закрепе: за эти годы там накопилось много всего интересного и полезного.
А всем остальным хочу сказать спасибо — за то, ч…
Вчера был в МШК (Московской школе кино) на защите дипломов выпускников курса режиссуры монтажа. Меня и Диму SuperVHS пригласили в жюри — оценить и прокомментировать работы студентов.
Часть ребят с потока в качестве диплома выбрала короткую форму: кто-то сделал клип, кто-то ролик для соцсетей, но большинство — трейлеры. При том что в школе основное внимание уделяется монтажу кино, такой выбор вызывает уважение — трей…
❤67🔥33👍18👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jump_cut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
использую ИИ-инструменты в посте (ротоскоп, апскейл, шумодав, транскрипт), но не генерацию41%
использую для текстов: сценарии, логлайны, описания, письма клиентам40%
только на препродакшене: референсы, аниматики, раскадровки23%
хочу внедрить, но не знаю с чего начать15%
не использую и не планирую5%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как зритель: что вы чувствуете, когда видите ИИ-видео?
уже баннерная слепота, сразу перелистываю31%
если сделано качественно и есть идея — смотрю55%
мне всё равно, важен результат, а не способ18%
хихикаю с нейрослопа16%
категорически против11%
жду восстания машин12%
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой жанр, на ваш взгляд, самый сложный для монтажа трейлера? (можно выбрать несколько вариантов)
Фантастика9%
Триллер11%
Экшн14%
Комедия35%
Драма14%
Документальное кино27%
Мультфильмы8%
Ужасы10%
Авторское кино33%
The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2025 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,432,839 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JumpСut | Монтажка” (@jump_cut), 10,596 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jump_cut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
