Junior Obito calls pinned a photo

Channel
Junior Obito calls
@juniorobitocalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
957subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001780582425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juniorobitocalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juniorobitocalls |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 957 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 962 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 965 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 970 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 977 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 987 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 988 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 988 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 28.9% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 18.4% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
(BASE) Resyst Protocol $RESYST is building a privacy-focused crypto ecosystem designed to bring real utility to users, not just speculation. The ecosystem already includes: 🔄 Decentralized Swap 💬 Private Communication Tools 🔒 Liquidity Locker 💳 Virtual Crypto Card (non kyc) - Android and iOS applications are currently in development and coming soon. Unlike many projects that rely solely on marketing and hype, RES…
❤1🎉1🐳1👏1
Junior Obito calls pinned a photo
$DOGS (ETH) This is bullish and it being an old CA of 3 years 8 months i would be looking for any entry under 50k, bullish ticker, based team, chart looking green. tax buy 0% sell 0% chart: http://dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x99E5a98Fe3503b08A5475227c2AF3E668Fd558A0 mcap:39k telegram: https://t.me/ogdogserc
❤1🏆1🐳1
$ELONMUSK just a good potential community, based ticker drive people into the space, chart is totally green, lets go make a good entry buys, mcap:15k 0x7c0566413f788dfa9da919810b691ccba134c263 https://x.com/1trillionparody https://t.me/Trillionaire_Elonmusk
🏆3❤2🍾2👏2
Junior Obito calls pinned a photo
$BAWSAQ (ETH) The future of finance is here, This is the Degen Stonks GTAVI narrative, the OG first launched BAWSAQ on Eth. Lets get hype and send this, no slacking. tax buy 0% sell 0% chart:http://dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x393dd67104dE4A35Ac837a0BED937032a6E21db7 mcap:23k telegram: https://t.me/BAWSAQeth
🍾1🏆1👏1🔥1
Junior Obito calls pinned a photo
$BASTIAN (ETH) Next milady in the making and possibly something even bigger. This feels really early here, potentially the next eth PVE runner we all needed. Tax Sell 0% Buy 0% Chart: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x4ad8f2690486fbaa92f60b5d41f8b83ecd7ea8b4 Mcap:12k Telegram: https://t.me/BastianERC20
❤1🏆1👏1😁1
$ATELIER This is encourage because to me that means the floor is made up of holders, If you build AI agents: register yours, set your pricing, and get paid automatically every time someone hires it. ca:7newJUjH7LGsGPDfEq83gxxy2d1q39A84SeUKha8pump tax: sell 0% buy 0% chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/7newJUjH7LGsGPDfEq83gxxy2d1q39A84SeUKha8pump mcap:223k telegram: https://t.me/atelierai
❤2😁1
Junior Obito calls pinned a photo
$SAA (ETH) lets go ape this bullish community, it’s a fundamental principle that voting rights are reserved for American citizens. Upholding the integrity of our electoral system is essential to maintaining public trust and fairness. tax sell 0% buy 0% chart:http://dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x08397A85DAA12Fe86Fc0b0fe8ADb9a600286a61d mcap:18k telegram: https://t.me/saa_erc20
❤1🏆1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @juniorobitocalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Anon_Cult · 1441 postAstroShibX Portal
@AstroShibX · 721 postATELIER PORTAL | useatelier.ai
@atelierai · 1341 postBAWSAQ - Portal
@BAWSAQeth · 181 post🐕DOGS🐕
@ogdogserc · 451 postResyst Portal
@resystprotocol · 171 post$SAA PORTAL
@saa_erc20 · 291 postWorld’s First Trillionaire | $ELONMUSK
@Trillionaire_Elonmusk · 801 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@juniorobitocalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 31 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Junior Obito calls” (@juniorobitocalls), 957 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juniorobitocalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.