![Telegram profile photo for 純情 [Júnjō] | Cosplay](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/fb/fba56b50fc3056f33314ece747b30cd1a74f516f472524cc0fc39a2226813635.jpg)
Channel
@junjo69
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
78subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002314075315 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @junjo69 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/junjo69 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 78 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 77 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 77 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
213 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 33.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 38 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5366256792458248239 | 36 | 16.9% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 16.0% | |
| 💘 | 18 | 8.45% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 3.76% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 2.35% | |
| custom 5296739894914207637 | 2 | 0.939% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Картина называется «он не дотерпел до зп что бы сходить в салон поэтому импульсивные стрижки затупленными кухонными ножницами на даче звучит как хорошее решение» Дедлайню на фуджик за других потому что мне не хватает адреналина 😈
custom 53662567924582482395❤3💅2
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ Уже в следующие выходные еду покорять Воронеж и FujiFest, буду выступать во втором блоке в Фламбе🔥 Буду рад если придёте посмотреть на мой кринж 😇
❤7🔥5❤🔥2🍌2
20 Dispatch - Призм, Фламбе 99 - Обузянки в Гуччи
❤5💘3❤🔥1
Чуть не забыл видео выступления с Акамару! Спасибо огромное Никте за видео 🙏
Отстрелялись отвыступали, страшно, но сделали, чиллимся с бейбой и ждём смотры 👌
❤15🍌3
Двигаемся на Акамару 🔥🏃♂️➡️
custom 53662567924582482397❤6💅3🔥3💘1
Что ж, дамы и господа, путь на Фуджи Фест проложен, осталось по нему пройти Это выступление будет либо магнум опусом либо магнум фиаско, надеюсь я справлюсь вложиться как надо
🔥6
Добро пожаловать в мир СДВГ где либо всё и сразу либо ничего и никогда, опять я немного пропал, но это было по причине резкая подготовка к Акамару после ленивого празднования др, однако делаю затравку на то что есть свежий контент и скоро буду постить, когда соберу голову в кучку и дооформлю посты как следует что б по красоте было, мне надо ко всему по очереди подходить иначе бабах ж°пы и мозга и не успею ни там ни т…
❤12❤🔥1
Всем раздал смачный чмок в комментариях, всем повторять спасибо неловко как то поэтому постом благодарю всех кто оставил пожелания, всех обнимаю и танцую танец спасибо !💃❤️
custom 53662567924582482399❤5
С Днём Рожденья меня! Урааа!! Этот год моей жизни был насыщенным, но перескакивая формальности я просто рад быть здесь и делать то что мне нравится, быть среди понимающих меня людей и давать выход творчесткому, спасибо всем кто поддерживает меня на этом пути, бесконечно благодарен вашему вкладу в свою жизнь 🙏 Если хотите ещё как то поддержать буду рад репосту 👀
❤🔥25💘13custom 536625679245824823911❤7
А мы с моим горячим другом отправимся на Акамару в дуэте Фламбе и Призмы! ЗАЖИГАЙ!
❤🔥8custom 53662567924582482394🔥1
Мы прошли на Акамару!!! Значит будем отжигать 🔥
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @junjo69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“純情 [Júnjō] | Cosplay” (@junjo69), 78 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/junjo69.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.