Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for хто такий Юнкер

Channel

хто такий Юнкер

@junker_ukr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

8,603subscribers

-177 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002215099980
TypeChannel
Username@junker_ukr
DescriptionМоя думка є субʼєктивною. Охфіцер Галенко Іван «Юнкер» @JunkerUKR_bot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/junker_ukr

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,5649,6159,089.56 August 2026 — 8,780 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,780 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,777 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,729 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,779 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,719 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,843 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,711 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,953 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,388 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,615 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,569 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,523 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,210 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,229 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,225 subscribers30 September 2026 — 8,676 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,653 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,620 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,612 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,599 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,584 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,570 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,564 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,574 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,572 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,603 subscribers8,6036 August 20266 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 93 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,406–9,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 15:378,603+31
3 Nov 2026, 15:578,572-2
1 Nov 2026, 02:298,574+10
28 Oct 2026, 17:518,564-6
26 Oct 2026, 01:488,570-14
22 Oct 2026, 17:158,584-15
19 Oct 2026, 18:498,599-13
16 Oct 2026, 18:298,612-8
13 Oct 2026, 11:018,620-33
7 Oct 2026, 02:188,653-23
30 Sept 2026, 00:198,676-549
19 Sept 2026, 16:009,225-4
15 Sept 2026, 01:019,229+19
11 Sept 2026, 14:579,210-313
7 Sept 2026, 07:189,523-46
2 Sept 2026, 07:449,569-46
30 Aug 2026, 17:299,615+227
27 Aug 2026, 23:129,388+435
25 Aug 2026, 08:148,953+242
22 Aug 2026, 11:048,711first reading

Engagement

131 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.5%
avg views ÷ 8,603 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,060
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 131 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held131 (2 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total206,080
Reactions total5,873
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 00:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
984
Videos
223
Links
800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 58s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,296 reactions across 126 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,89923.9%
💯2,54415.6%
❤2,39014.7%
🔥1,80211.1%
🤬1,4879.12%
👍1,1346.96%
⚡6754.14%
🫡6353.90%
❤‍🔥5953.65%
👀5193.18%
✍1590.976%
🎉1510.927%
custom 54630508039608795211170.718%
🤔800.491%
😢340.209%
🤝340.209%
💔330.203%
🍓60.037%
😍20.012%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 129 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,793 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 129 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
39
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @junker_ukr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 131 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (31.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 20:30 UTC≈1,330 views90 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Крим, Кубань - захоплені етнічні землі України серед «лідерів» рФ по втратам військовослужбовців. Покажіть цю статистику Росстату нашим «маминим царапінкам» - це доля всіх окупованих земель, якщо наше суспільство та влада (яка йде від народу) не збере раму.

💯79🤬7✍2❤1👍1

7 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC≈6,940 views80 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Отримав від Лачена та SLON FM підгони Дуже класна мерчуха ❤️‍🔥

❤‍🔥60❤8🔥7⚡5

6 Nov 2026, 21:47 UTC≈2,890 views123 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Діди в Фейсбуці щиро не розуміють, хто такий охфіцер Нацгвардії Іван Галенко і чому він має право когось називати совковим або оцінювати чиюсь діяльність. І взагалі, нехай йде будку побудує або зробить хоч би 10% від того, що зробив Серпухов (я іронічно задаю зустрічне питання, це скільки в гривнях?) Я скажу більше, на це має право будь-який громадянин, який має експертизу. Наша курсантсько-офіцерська спільнота SLON…

💯103❤10👍5⚡2❤‍🔥2🤔1

6 Nov 2026, 10:11 UTC≈3,160 views227 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Замітив цікаву штуку: суспільство обожнює військових, тільки поки вони мовчки сидять в окопі або красиво гинуть у стрічці новин. Як тільки живий військовий відкриває рота і ставить незручні питання тим, хто в тилу … любов миттєво закінчується і починаються лекції про «права людини» та «погану державу». (С) з мережі

💯202❤14👍6⚡2😢2🤬1

6 Nov 2026, 08:28 UTC≈3,130 views148 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Цивільний росіянин підказав куди летіти українській FPV, бо прифронтові регіони рФ вже награлись в війну і їм досить 🤷‍♂️

❤‍🔥109🔥27⚡8👍3🫡1

5 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC≈3,790 views133 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Пів року тому, я активно почав заявляти, що начальник Військового Інституту Танкових військ Серпухов згідно чинного законодавства незаконно перебуває на посаді. Але його адковати заявили, що «так як назва інституту змінювалась, то обнулились і терміни» Це так не працює. Є законодавство і є репутація серед офіцерів та курсантів, яка була жахливою. Лише стара гвардія продовжує вилизувати своїм покровителям ноги

💯123❤7⚡2🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈3,810 views73 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Хто такий ваш Юнкер https://hromadske.ua/viyskovi/273815-kursanty-maiut-stavaty-krashchymy-shchodnia-drapatyy-zvilnyv-kerivnykiv-dvokh-vvnz-serpukhova-i-sliusarenka

🫡58❤‍🔥7⚡4❤4

4 Nov 2026, 16:33 UTC≈62,600 views181 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🇺🇦Кожен четвертий окупант за жовтень знищувався в смузі відповідальності угруповання військ «Азов».

🔥147🤝14❤11⚡7👀2

4 Nov 2026, 16:09 UTC≈3,890 views161 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Чого плачеш, дурочка?

😁148❤8⚡4🤔1

4 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,730 views165 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

😎 СБУ затримала організаторів проросійських акцій на Борщагівці Хтось здивується тому, що мразі курувались кацапами? Всім грозить кримінал і довгі роки вʼязниці за 2 статтями ККУ.

⚡120👍36❤5🔥3😁1

4 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC≈3,160 views171 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @ukrbavovnaPhoto

Міноборони звільнило очільників двох військових вишів України — ЖВІ та ВІТВ: Слюсаренка та Серпухова. «Обоє були совками, це дуже хороші новини», — пише офіцер Юнкер. Таких різких змін у військовій освіті не було за жодного командування.

⚡140❤‍🔥20❤6🤝4✍1

4 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC≈3,730 views207 reactionsread 8 November 2026

☄️Драпатий прямо зараз завітав в ще один військовий виш

⚡139🔥50👀14👍3❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @junker_ukr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @junker_ukr as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTCAnonymous Poll1,550 voters approx.

Маркус?

  1. Наш слон81%
  2. Не наш слон23%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q134451665 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelIvan Halenko
X / Twitter@junker_ukr

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“хто такий Юнкер” (@junker_ukr), 8,603 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/junker_ukr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.