Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JUST BATTLE

Channel

JUST BATTLE

@justbattle

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,338subscribers

+3,380 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003758136612
TypeChannel
Username@justbattle
Description🏆площадка, созданая для внепланок, тролль батлов, откатов, мемов, раздач и так далее 🏆чат - @trolljustdoit 🏆прайс - @justdoitprice 🏆владелец - @letsgotroll
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/justbattle

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,9587,3385,6487 August 2026 — 3,958 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,987 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,274 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,483 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,599 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,623 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,604 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,600 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,637 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,653 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,742 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,119 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,435 subscribers30 September 2026 — 6,044 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,438 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,669 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,721 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,785 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,851 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,944 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,067 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,235 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,338 subscribers7 August 20263 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 88 days, net +3,380. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,451–7,845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 13:077,338+103
31 Oct 2026, 15:007,235+168
29 Oct 2026, 00:297,067+123
26 Oct 2026, 02:196,944+93
22 Oct 2026, 16:216,851+66
19 Oct 2026, 15:156,785+64
16 Oct 2026, 19:266,721+52
13 Oct 2026, 09:266,669+231
6 Oct 2026, 20:186,438+394
30 Sept 2026, 06:166,044+609
16 Sept 2026, 05:155,435+316
12 Sept 2026, 09:405,119+377
8 Sept 2026, 04:194,742+89
2 Sept 2026, 15:464,653+16
30 Aug 2026, 12:044,637+37
27 Aug 2026, 05:544,600-4
24 Aug 2026, 14:574,604-19
20 Aug 2026, 12:044,623+24
17 Aug 2026, 13:144,599+116
14 Aug 2026, 04:564,483first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.86%
avg views ÷ 7,338 subscribers
Avg views / post
724
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held46 (6 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total15,919
Reactions total238
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 01:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
484
Videos
281
Links
285

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 51s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

517 reactions across 34 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 538895930239016112413125.3%
custom 538883102030696341911321.9%
custom 53889781100519511337514.5%
custom 53888691295517841756612.8%
custom 5388876160413259173519.86%
custom 5390871602218963850366.96%
custom 5389105138004696494254.84%
custom 5389013101150509963132.51%
custom 538894007382157908371.35%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (4.55%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 21:27 UTC250 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53888761604132591735custom 53889781100519511333

Signed Geng Beng Just

4 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC557 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🙂с днём народного единства🙂 🙂когда мы едины, мы всех могнем🙂 🙂записи🙂сносер🙂чатик🙂

custom 538897811005195113313custom 53888761604132591738custom 53888310203069634197

Signed Geng Beng Just

3 Nov 2026, 23:04 UTC746 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🙂я много кому не отвечал по набору ибо у меня в личных чисто спам и я не всегда вижу ваши заявки🙂 🙂теперь этим занимаются лидеры и заместители кланов, и все ваши заявки рассмотрят🙂 🙂записи🙂сносер🙂чатик🙂

custom 53888310203069634197custom 53890131011505099635custom 53889593023901611244custom 53889781100519511333

Signed Geng Beng Just

3 Nov 2026, 22:57 UTC745 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🙂перед прочтением текста, просмотрите видео, там будет вся основная информация🙂 🙂ДОРОГОЕ УЧАСТНИКИ, ФАНАТЫ, ПОДПИСЧИКИ🙂 🙂наша площадка на официальном уровне открывает свой токсик сквад на просторах комьюнити троллинга🙂 🙂по набору в пк стак писать: @koz1d_eBOY, @id218821 🙂по набору в тф стак писать: @ANALNOE_RABCTBO

custom 53889781100519511335

Signed Geng Beng Just

3 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC741 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🙂так, ток честно я ругаться не буду, кто шляпой водил по моему энергетику?🙂 🙂записи🙂сносер🙂чатик🙂

custom 538883102030696341911custom 53889781100519511336custom 53889593023901611245

Signed Geng Beng Just

3 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC850 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🙂три правила бойцовского клуба🙂 🙂токсик баттл на 8000 подписчиков🙂 🙂записи🙂сносер🙂чатик🙂

custom 538897811005195113316custom 53889593023901611249custom 53888310203069634198

Signed Geng Beng Just

3 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC761 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 538883102030696341914custom 53889781100519511334custom 53889593023901611243

Signed who?bezdar hype

3 Nov 2026, 08:51 UTC932 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🙂надо было идти гулять, а не дома сидеть🙂 🙂токсик баттл на 8000 подписчиков🙂 🙂записи🙂сносер🙂чатик🙂

custom 53888310203069634199custom 53889593023901611245custom 53889781100519511335

Signed Geng Beng Just

2 Nov 2026, 21:39 UTC976 views29 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🙂ребята, а это точно будет в тик ток?…🙂 🙂токсик баттл на 8000 подписчиков🙂 🙂записи🙂сносер🙂чатик🙂

custom 538887616041325917314custom 53890131011505099638custom 53889781100519511337

Signed Geng Beng Just

2 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC980 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🙂как обычно внепы на высоте🙂 🙂записи🙂сносер🙂чатик🙂

custom 538897811005195113310custom 53888310203069634194custom 53889593023901611244

Signed Geng Beng Just

2 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC916 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026

козид вин🙂

custom 53888761604132591737

Signed Geng Beng Just

2 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC916 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Poll

кто вин

  1. козид64%
  2. феар36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53889781100519511333

Signed Geng Beng Just

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @justbattle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@justbattle edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTCAnonymous Poll121 voters

кто вин

  1. козид64%
  2. феар36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTCAnonymous Poll120 voters

кто вин

  1. бог xiii36%
  2. саня лирика64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

кто вин

  1. симуляка72%
  2. вайт кент28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTCAnonymous Poll224 voters

кто круче

  1. иисус29%
  2. фрости53%
  3. ами17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Poll155 voters

хотите разыграю прем на 12 месяцев

  1. да газ босс88%
  2. не я бомж и мне это нравиться12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JUST BATTLE” (@justbattle), 7,338 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justbattle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.