https://t.me/boost/justicaqmais
Signed Eric

Channel
@justicaqmais
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,083subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002095693331 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @justicaqmais |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/justicaqmais |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 1,083 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 1,086 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 1,091 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:49 | 1,093 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 1,094 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 1,097 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 1,096 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 1,091 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 1,087 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 1,086 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
82 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 28 | 34.1% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 18.3% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 12.2% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 8.54% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 8.54% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 8.54% | |
| 😨 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 2.44% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/boost/justicaqmais
Signed Eric
Ouça como Trump e seu círculo íntimo falam sobre OVNIs. Eles continuam dizendo que OVNIs são reais e sugerem fortemente que não são naves humanas. Mais importante, não há preocupação. Eles não estão tentando criar uma narrativa de ameaça de OVNIs, o que seria necessário para uma operação de bandeira falsa. Eles não estão atirando em, ou derrubando, OVNIs porque veríamos evidências disso. Não há conflito com as n…
👍3🥰2
Signed Eric
Não, alienígenas não seriam demônios! https://ovniologia.com.br/pt/2026/06/nao-alienigenas-nao-seriam-demonios.html CANAL JUSTIÇA Q+ https://t.me/justicaqmais
🔥5
Signed Eric
David Grusch BOMBA no Dr. Phil: "Eu vi 'Vídeos e Fotos' de naves OVNIs recuperadas com os Pilotos. Tanto Áudio quanto Visual" 🛸👽 “Eu tive pessoas do programa de recuperação exfiltrando evidências audiovisuais para eu ver. Tanto vídeo quanto fotos. Das naves recuperadas. E alguns dos cadáveres mortos que foram recuperados. Chame-os de pilotos.” Ele confirmou, sob questionamento, que viu os cadáveres. Ele entrevistou…
👍4
Signed Eric
DAS TREVAS PARA A LUZ CANAL JUSTIÇA Q+ https://t.me/justicaqmais
❤2
Signed Eric
QUEGEIROS+ GRUPO DE CONVERSAS DO CANAL JUSTIÇA Q+ COM CONTEÚDOS EXCLUSIVOS DE EXOPOLÍTICA, DO GRANDE DESPERTAR, LEI DO UNO, O EVENTO E MUITO+. SEJA MEMBRO! https://lastlink.com/p/CEF6C7E3B/
❤1
Signed Eric
🚨"Esta fonte aeroespacial em particular me enviou esta suposta foto Não-Humana de uma fonte confiável dele em uma empresa aeroespacial muito grande." "Ele me enviou isso como, citação..." "Esta imagem estranha, Linda, é de um jovem que limpou a casa de seu avô após sua morte e se deparou com esta foto estranha, mais oito outras fotos semelhantes do trabalho militar de seu avô no final dos anos 1940."- Linda Molten …
🫡2
Signed Eric
O governo Trump está conduzindo um programa secreto de OVNIs? https://share.google/bunHoXxlO87ZwHjRT CANAL JUSTIÇA Q+ https://t.me/justicaqmais
🔥5
Signed Eric
O bilionário Robert Bigelow acabou de revelar o verdadeiro significado da vida 🩶 "As coisas mais importantes na vida é adquirir amor e conhecimento" "A pesquisa diz que essas são as únicas duas coisas que realmente importam" "Isso não significa que do outro lado você se torna automaticamente um anjo. Seu caráter define que tipo de espírito você é" "Em certo ponto, as Reencarnações se tornam irrelevantes, não apre…
👍6
Signed Eric
OVNI com “astronauta morto” caiu no Brasil? - OVNI Hoje! https://www.ovnihoje.com/2026/08/10/ovni-com-astronauta-morto-caiu-no-brasil/ CANAL JUSTIÇA Q+ https://t.me/justicaqmais
😨5
Signed Eric
Apesar das alegações de fontes anônimas de Ross Coulthart, objetos voadores não identificados (OVNIs) de origem não humana não estão sendo abatidos por armas humanas. Lembrem-se, Trump certa vez desafiou os militares de Biden a abater os misteriosos drones, porque ele sabia que eles não poderiam ser abatidos. Os Pleiadianos explicaram que, há mais de 10 anos, o único grupo extraterrestre em nossos céus é a Federaçã…
🔥5❤1
Signed Eric
O GRANDE FLASH SOLAR CANAL JUSTIÇA Q+ https://t.me/justicaqmais
🥰5❤1
Signed Eric
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @justicaqmais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JUSTIÇA Q+” (@justicaqmais), 1,083 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justicaqmais.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.