Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for жутя.jpg

Channel

жутя.jpg

@jutypec

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

738subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001718320324
TypeChannel
Username@jutypec
Created11 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jutypec

Growth

7317477397 August 2026 — 736 subscribers7 August 2026 — 735 subscribers13 August 2026 — 731 subscribers20 August 2026 — 747 subscribers28 August 2026 — 746 subscribers7 September 2026 — 738 subscribers7387 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 729–749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 12:41738-8
28 Aug 2026, 22:23746-1
20 Aug 2026, 22:35747+16
13 Aug 2026, 23:48731-4
7 Aug 2026, 15:18735-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:00736first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

829 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
37144.8%
🍓11814.2%
🔥8310.0%
custom 5379553830818048890759.05%
💋566.76%
custom 5382037116484085929425.07%
💘354.22%
❤‍🔥333.98%
💅131.57%
🥰30.362%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 829 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jutypec. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC152 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

краши моего детства

31🍓8❤‍🔥4💋2🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC179 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

доказываю что не отлыниваю

28🔥8❤‍🔥7🍓4custom 53795538308180488902💋1

6 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC194 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

немного традишки ещё села за комикс кстати

27🍓6🔥5🥰3❤‍🔥2💋1custom 53795538308180488901

5 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC243 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

20🍓2🔥2❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC239 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я теперь тока так их кушать буду:

24🔥4🍓3❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC243 views42 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

я только что узнала, что все кусочку фруктов в моих любименьких йогуртах это кабачок

33🍓4🔥4❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC248 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ля хихикаю чот #дети

44custom 537955383081804889013custom 53820371164840859297❤‍🔥5🍓3🔥2💋1

5 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC257 views54 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

💋348custom 53795538308180488906🍓3❤‍🔥2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC265 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ccicnkPhoto

КСТАТИ РАЗ УЖ ТУТ ПАДАЮЩИЕ КОМЕТЫ ЗАСВЕТИЛИСЬ Жутя нарисовала моих прекрасных мальчишек 😭 ОНИИИИ ТАКИИИИЕ СЛАДУСИКИ ПОЛУЧИЛИСЬ Я ИХ ЩАС СОЖРУ

custom 537955383081804889020🍓8💋8🔥32

2 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC335 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

сегодня утром нарисовала парный скетч к Алана к Луюн я засекла время крч, по итогу я нарисовала его за 10 минут прикиньтееее 3 минуты скетч, 7 минут лайн но хз буду доделываь или нет

29🍓12🔥9❤‍🔥1💋1

1 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC370 views37 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

СПАСИБО ЗА ЗВЕЗДЫ И ПОДАРКИ ЧТО ВЫ ТВОРИТЕ КОШМАР

🍓2210🔥4💋1

1 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC351 views68 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а вот и моя девочка❤️❤️ #дети

custom 53820371164840859293517🍓13🔥2💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jutypec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

kiokio🐯
@demonrumanga · 51,703
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“жутя.jpg” (@jutypec), 738 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jutypec.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.