Напоминаю про новую работу. Буду рада активу и, по возможности, репостам
custom 54472932389667896382

Channel
@k_3ikeress
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
179subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003902751239 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @k_3ikeress |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/k_3ikeress |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 179 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 178 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 175 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 174 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 168 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 168 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
238 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5447293238966789638 | 56 | 23.5% | |
| custom 5253741744658338593 | 45 | 18.9% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 18.1% | |
| custom 5368365651465368843 | 26 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5447660746433403867 | 24 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5447441990864116007 | 14 | 5.88% | |
| custom 5445164489966135945 | 12 | 5.04% | |
| custom 5447394960972226830 | 10 | 4.20% | |
| custom 5409229237334859193 | 4 | 1.68% | |
| custom 5352633173375198716 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| custom 5978989067562391073 | 1 | 0.42% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Напоминаю про новую работу. Буду рада активу и, по возможности, репостам
custom 54472932389667896382
“Is it cold in the water?” /// ✨️/// Для меня трагедия Ренаты является одной из тем, которую я хотела бы изучить через свое творчество, посвященное ее лору. Лучше рекомендую самим его прочесть в биографии. Работа как раз посвящена эпизоду с пожаром в доме, в котором она потеряла родителей и руку. Однако сохранилась ее фамилия и некоторые наработки родителей, что сыграет свою роль в становлении влиятельной химбароне…
custom 544729323896678963832custom 544744199086411600714custom 544516448996613594511custom 53683656514653688431
У меня появился X!! https://x.com/3ikeress Буду рада поддержке в старте✨️✨️
custom 544729323896678963811
Обновила реакции. Оцените
custom 544766074643340386724custom 544729323896678963811custom 544739496097222683010custom 53683656514653688431custom 54451644899661359451
Все ещё в хорошем настроении после отпуска в Далянь. Ещё и мем из тикток сделала.
custom 536836565146536884317custom 52537417446583385932custom 59789890675623910731
БАЙКРЕСС ФЕЯ
🔥16custom 52537417446583385939
Ещё помимо рисования пробую себя в другом рукоделии из натуральных камней. Покажу, что за лето делала, из своего щитпоста (ссылка на него в закрепе)
custom 525374174465833859317🔥7custom 54092292373348591934custom 53683656514653688431
... и отдельно гиф от foryia с АФ.
🔥20custom 53683656514653688431
СПАСИБО ВСЕМ, КТО АТАКОВАЛ МЕНЯ В АРТФАЙТ!! ВЫ ВСЕ КРУТЫШИ 🤩🤩 /// Думаю, уже можно подвести итоги и сказать спасибо всем участникам! Я ценю ваши старания и каждого виртуально целую. В качестве благодарности публикую атаки на меня с ссылками на авторов: 1. Yimiki 2. somiotis 3. Toffon 4. Lebyatpuya 5. LazurinaDreams 6. Ada_6895 7. S4lam4nd3r 8. loshi_tea ...
custom 525374174465833859317custom 53683656514653688435custom 53526331733751987163
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @k_3ikeress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@k_3ikeress named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BKRSS!! 📼” (@k_3ikeress), 179 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k_3ikeress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.