Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кирилл Пшинник - ректор университета Зерокодер

Channel

Кирилл Пшинник - ректор университета Зерокодер

@k_pshinnik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,518subscribers

+3,007 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001821417560
TypeChannel
Username@k_pshinnik
DescriptionЗаметки фаундера и СЕО «Зерокодер» про эдтех, ИИ и бытовую жизнь предпринимателя. Партнерство/реклама: @kpshinnik
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/k_pshinnik

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,5118,5187,014.56 August 2026 — 5,511 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,579 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,658 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,685 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,703 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,761 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,789 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,826 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,868 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,988 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,085 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,256 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,322 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,488 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,645 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,951 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,159 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,203 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,356 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,438 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,519 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,611 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,983 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,258 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,518 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +3,007. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,060–8,969 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 22:598,518+260
3 Nov 2026, 01:308,258+275
30 Oct 2026, 23:507,983+372
28 Oct 2026, 09:467,611+92
25 Oct 2026, 04:317,519+81
22 Oct 2026, 08:067,438+82
19 Oct 2026, 03:067,356+153
15 Oct 2026, 21:177,203+44
12 Oct 2026, 18:117,159+208
5 Oct 2026, 17:566,951+306
28 Sept 2026, 05:156,645+157
18 Sept 2026, 18:186,488+166
14 Sept 2026, 00:196,322+66
10 Sept 2026, 15:166,256+171
5 Sept 2026, 02:146,085+97
1 Sept 2026, 08:545,988+120
29 Aug 2026, 08:365,868+42
26 Aug 2026, 19:035,826+37
24 Aug 2026, 00:255,789+28
20 Aug 2026, 09:185,761first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.8%
avg views ÷ 8,518 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,160
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held43 (23 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total83,180
Reactions total1,226
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
84
Videos
5
Links
109

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,490 reactions across 43 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥81432.7%
👍63825.6%
❤59824.0%
😁1716.87%
🎉602.41%
👏271.08%
🤣230.924%
❤‍🔥190.763%
🤔150.602%
👀130.522%
💯130.522%
🤓130.522%
😢110.442%
😱110.442%
🤝110.442%
🤮70.281%
🏆60.241%
🍾40.161%
👌40.161%
🤡40.161%
15 further kinds281.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,490 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,390 views58 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Продолжаем узнавать, как вас видит нейросеть. Вставьте в ChatGPT картинку и напишите: Заполни эту комнату тем, что ты обо мне знаешь.

👍29😁21🤡4🔥3❤1

3 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTC≈3,030 views27 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @bs_business

Posted without readable text

❤20👍4🎉2👌1

3 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,580 views68 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Как заработать 400 тысяч рублей, не написав ни одной строчки кода? Кажется, я случайно открыл портал в новую реальность. Недавно наткнулся на хакатон AI Journey Contest 2026 от Сбера. Задача была серьезная: разработать новые методы обнаружения галлюцинаций больших языковых моделей. И тут у меня зародилась шальная мысль. А что, если взять Codex и поставить ему примерно такую задачу: Действуй как лучший ML-инженер …

🔥51❤10👏5🤔2

2 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC≈4,340 views134 reactionsread 8 November 2026

У Зерокодера появилась собственная статья в Википедии! 🎉 Казалось бы, небольшое событие, но для меня лично это очень приятный и даже немного символичный момент. Пять лет назад мы начинали как небольшой стартап, который учил людей создавать приложения без программирования. А сегодня мы крупнейшая в России образовательная компания в сфере ИИ, проводим научные исследования, запускаем магистратуры совместно с университ…

🔥64👍29❤14🎉11🏆6👏4😁3⚡1

1 Nov 2026, 08:57 UTC≈2,570 views42 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Пузырь может лопнуть. Технология останется. Китайский рынок ИИ-компаний серьезно трясет. К концу октября технологический индекс STAR50 потерял около 40% менее чем за четыре месяца. Производители чипов MetaX и Moore Threads подешевели примерно вдвое с июля. Инвесторов беспокоят завышенные оценки, окупаемость ИИ и ограничения на поставки китайского оборудования. В США тоже нервно: 30 октября Nasdaq упал на 2,9%, а дн…

❤23👍13🔥3👏1💯1🤔1

31 Oct 2026, 12:11 UTC≈2,950 views186 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Кажется, я перешел на новый уровень работы с ИИ. 😁 Запустил одновременно Claude Code и OpenAI Codex над одним проектом и сказал им... общаться друг с другом. И они начали. Причем не просто перекидывать друг другу задачи, а организовали полноценную командную работу. Обсуждают гипотезы, спорят, проводят независимые ревью, проверяют результаты экспериментов друг друга. В какой-то момент они вообще начали самостоятел…

😁91🔥39👍19🤣15❤14🤔5👏3

31 Oct 2026, 09:58 UTC≈5,110 views42 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

На днях провел очень бодрый вебинар по работе с китайскими нейросетями. И в свете последних блокировок Claude Code тема становится особенно актуальной. Оказалось, что DeepSeek Harness и GLM вполне способны решать большинство задач вайб-кодинга не хуже хваленого Claude Code! Причем зачастую за гораздо меньшие деньги. На вебинаре мы не просто обсуждали теорию, а решали реальные задачи. Я показал, как все это настроит…

❤19😁12👍8👎2🔥1

30 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC≈5,780 views117 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Из‑за блокировок пользоваться Claude Code стало сложно: аккаунты Anthropic блокируют не по географии, а после верификации документов. Если у вас нет иностранного паспорта, то пользоваться Claude Code с моделями от Anthropic может быть проблематично. При этом сам Claude Code можно подключить к другим моделям — DeepSeek или GLM. Программа та же, меняется только «мозг», и стоит это в разы дешевле, и работать все это бу…

❤53👍38🔥24🤝1🙏1

29 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC≈3,250 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Claude Code массово блокируют российских пользователей после запроса документов

  1. Да, заблокировали :(22%
  2. Все работает :)23%
  3. Я не пользуюсь Claude Code49%
  4. Что такое Вайб-кодинг?7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😱5🤔3🤬2

29 Oct 2026, 10:24 UTC≈3,470 views34 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Рубрика «В интернете опять кто-то не прав». Тут НАФИ (Национальное агентство финансовых исследований), один из ведущих российских аналитических центров, опубликовал исследование об использовании нейросетей россиянами. Я сам активно исследую это направление, и у меня возникли очень большие вопросы как к результатам, так и к методологии. Хочу развернуть свою мысль, а вы напишите, что думаете. Во-первых, откуда взяли…

❤17💯7👍5🤓2👏1🤔1😡1

29 Oct 2026, 07:39 UTC≈4,930 views47 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Один из самых глубоких разговоров, которые были у меня на канале. И я очень рекомендую его посмотреть. Вышел новый подкаст со Степаном Гершуни. Мы больше часа говорили об искусственном интеллекте. Но это не очередной разговор про то, какая нейросеть лучше пишет код и какие профессии исчезнут. Это разговор о том, каким вообще будет мир, в котором человеческий интеллект перестанет быть главным конкурентным преимуществ…

🔥22👍15❤7🐳3

28 Oct 2026, 05:44 UTC≈5,530 views54 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Мой фаворит для вайб-кодинга в конце октября 2026 году 👀 Я вчера весь день гонял новую GPT-6.1 Terra от OpenAI и записал для вас ролик с впечатлениями. На мой взгляд, сейчас это самая выгодная модель для вайб-кодинга, если вы в экосистеме OpenAI. На повседневных задачах она отлично справляется на уровне GPT-6.1 Sol, а стоит в 2 раза дешевле. Когда регулярно работаешь с кодом, собираешь проекты и докручиваешь их вмес…

👍28🔥13❤11👏1🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @k_pshinnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTCAnonymous Poll816 voters

Claude Code массово блокируют российских пользователей после запроса документов

  1. Да, заблокировали :(22%
  2. Все работает :)23%
  3. Я не пользуюсь Claude Code49%
  4. Что такое Вайб-кодинг?7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кирилл Пшинник - ректор университета Зерокодер” (@k_pshinnik), 8,518 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k_pshinnik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.