Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кабан шашлык

Channel

Кабан шашлык

@kabanchiki546

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002790901535
TypeChannel
Username@kabanchiki546
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kabanchiki546

Previous handles

@kabanchiki546 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@kabanchiki546
held 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026

Growth

33393610 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35 subscribers24 August 2026 — 38 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39 subscribers10 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 18:1639+1
24 Aug 2026, 20:0238+3
17 Aug 2026, 14:1735+2
11 Aug 2026, 01:0233no change
10 Aug 2026, 02:3033first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54021746204071774681934.5%
custom 53166794309097325211221.8%
custom 53437702163021360151120.0%
custom 538653537746709422347.27%
custom 547240355480942443447.27%
custom 591574097972953560647.27%
custom 519320048694934665111.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC16 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎬 Сценпак за стрим 09.08.2026 Все клипы в комментах. Если будете использовать клипы в своих эдитах - можете отметить меня (это не обязательно) 🫶 #clips 🐗kaban shashluk

custom 54021746204071774682custom 59157409797295356062

9 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

шарфик каэс гоу

custom 54021746204071774683

8 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC29 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Алексей, лучше бы под 0

custom 53865353774670942234custom 54724035548094244342custom 51932004869493466511custom 53437702163021360151custom 54021746204071774681

7 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC31 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вот еще немножко фоточек

custom 54021746204071774686custom 53166794309097325211custom 59157409797295356061

4 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC43 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Немного выебонов с маттерхорна🎧

custom 53437702163021360155custom 53166794309097325211custom 59157409797295356061

4 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC47 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Мужчины, с вашего позволения трошки отдохну

custom 54021746204071774687custom 53166794309097325212custom 53437702163021360152

2 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Хуя пацик поднялся

custom 53166794309097325216

1 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @davidvency

Many users have noticed an issue with videos being hidden on TikTok, affecting content posted in June and July. Our developers carefully analyzed several of these videos and found that the issue is on TikTok's side. It appears that TikTok is testing a new video review system. As many of you know, the platform often experiences technical issues - for example, there was recently a bug that caused videos to take much l…

1 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

У всех нас просто не отображаются эдиты ахаххв

custom 54724035548094244342

1 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC48 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вот не понимаю, сами порят качество видео в тт, и не дают постить через метод

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kabanchiki546. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кабан шашлык” (@kabanchiki546), 39 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kabanchiki546.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.