Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net -3,547. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,553–16,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 01:08
12,085
-25
3 Nov 2026, 04:29
12,110
-25
2 Nov 2026, 03:16
12,135
-27
1 Nov 2026, 05:39
12,162
-23
31 Oct 2026, 03:15
12,185
-18
30 Oct 2026, 01:47
12,203
-29
28 Oct 2026, 23:06
12,232
-35
27 Oct 2026, 20:00
12,267
-25
26 Oct 2026, 21:15
12,292
-32
25 Oct 2026, 19:47
12,324
-15
24 Oct 2026, 22:55
12,339
-25
23 Oct 2026, 20:18
12,364
-16
22 Oct 2026, 22:48
12,380
-20
21 Oct 2026, 18:50
12,400
-23
20 Oct 2026, 14:36
12,423
-25
19 Oct 2026, 14:46
12,448
-25
18 Oct 2026, 13:01
12,473
-17
17 Oct 2026, 14:46
12,490
-17
16 Oct 2026, 16:35
12,507
-34
15 Oct 2026, 13:06
12,541
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 12,085 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.703%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
62 (18 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
33,155
Reactions total
233
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
171
Videos
11
Links
92
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,968 reactions across 62 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5776230078199373374
697
35.4%
custom 5918091224488615830
362
18.4%
custom 5773665063600660243
302
15.3%
custom 5917989283439845266
175
8.89%
custom 5917796190300151560
77
3.91%
❤
76
3.86%
custom 5917959360402693329
74
3.76%
👀
47
2.39%
😭
29
1.47%
custom 5918048128786767605
28
1.42%
🔥
27
1.37%
🎉
16
0.813%
😁
10
0.508%
🍌
9
0.457%
👍
8
0.407%
😢
8
0.407%
🌭
5
0.254%
🕊
5
0.254%
🙈
5
0.254%
❤🔥
3
0.152%
5 further kinds
5
0.254%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,968 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
звук в ноке починили спустя аж 10 лет 🤣
разрабы нашли баг, из за которого звук ранения от первого лица не играл 🔞
Есть два одновременных звука:
сердцебиение в ноке не новое, оно ещё в старых патчах было. а вот звук отдышки ➡️ из недавнего
сомневаюсь что завезут на глобал, но к новогодней обнове надеюсь успеют 👋
а каких еще звуков, не хватает в игре❓
🐽 kaban.gg |😎 кабаний чат
тиммейт станет не нужен, ведь есть телефон‼️
ты всё правильно понял, телефон решили доработать и завезли нехило функций 🦎
🐽 теперь ты можешь позвонить сразу в 4 новых места:
🟢в апартаменты, чтобы снять номерок на вечер
🟢синоптикам, чтобы узнать, завтра дождь из серы или из угля
🟢на электростанцию, чтобы узнать, как там дела с общей сетью острова
🟢торговцу, который катит по дороге
куда будешь звонить чаще всего❓
🐽…
кабанью морду обесценивают ежедневно ✌️
крабы только в октябре появились, а им уже и баги правят, и расцветки добавляют 😡
а мне, получается, и так сойдёт? 😢
в коммитах засветился редкий синий краб. это не сломанная текстура, такую расцветку добавили специально 🆗
Такая встреча заслуживает игрового достижения, как бы назвал❓
🐽 kaban.gg |😎 кабаний чат
открываю барбершоп для баранов 😄
завезли ножницы для стрижки овец, и я уже присматриваю место под кабаний салон 👀
ножницы дают на 25% больше шерсти, чем с ножа, а прочность вдвое выше ❌2⃣
ещё и случайный тычок по коже овцы не будет её ранить и пугать. наконец-то клиент не съебется посреди процедуры ☯️
только как свой салон красоты назвать хз, подсоби мне в комментах ‼️
🐽 kaban.gg |😎 кабаний чат
теперь даже акула уплывает в страхе 🦈
и всё благодаря пирогу из крокодила 🐊
захавал такой и получил отпугивание животных. даже акулы будут держаться от тебя подальше 🦔
правда, буквально весь зверинец не разбежится. быки и бараны останутся на месте, но таранить перестанут 🏳️🌈
я теперь боюсь не твоего калаша, а того, что ты на обед сожрал 🐽
🐽 kaban.gg |😎 кабаний чат
эти 5 слов найдет только настоящий растер 👀
щас узнаем кто реально подкован в растовском сленге ❤️
ищи слева направо и по диагонали ↔️
нашёл знакомое словечко ❓ газуй в комменты, а я скажу, прав ли ты
🐽 kaban.gg |😎 кабаний чат
дом из скрапа ➡️ наше будущее 🤨
на тест ветке завезли новенький скин на металл из скрапа 😮
снова пол почки отдавать за красивый скинчик для построек🔫
че каво, как думаешь, ⛏ заменит цветной метал❓
🐽 kaban.gg |😎 кабаний чат
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @kabangg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@kabangg edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KABAN | RUST” (@kabangg), 12,085 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kabangg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.