Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Настя Кадетова

Channel

Настя Кадетова

@kadetovaaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,951subscribers

+220 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002452422424
TypeChannel
Username@kadetovaaa
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kadetovaaa

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,73111,15810,944.57 August 2026 — 10,731 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,731 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,756 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,754 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,764 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,845 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,862 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,882 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,926 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,932 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,952 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,052 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,065 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,089 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,094 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,095 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,079 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,082 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,078 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,090 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,086 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,077 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,068 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,078 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,102 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,103 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,110 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,091 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,084 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,071 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,094 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,082 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,071 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,154 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,158 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,145 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,134 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,123 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,122 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,116 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,105 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,098 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,084 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,089 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,086 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,074 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,063 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,060 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,056 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,048 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,044 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,038 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,032 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,027 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,014 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,998 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,978 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,968 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,957 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,951 subscribers10,9517 August 20265 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net +220. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,667–11,222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:2110,951-6
4 Nov 2026, 14:5110,957-11
3 Nov 2026, 17:3910,968-10
2 Nov 2026, 17:1710,978-20
1 Nov 2026, 19:5110,998-16
31 Oct 2026, 21:2611,014-13
30 Oct 2026, 21:5011,027-5
29 Oct 2026, 23:3011,032-6
28 Oct 2026, 21:4711,038-6
27 Oct 2026, 18:5011,044-4
26 Oct 2026, 21:0911,048-8
25 Oct 2026, 21:5611,056-4
24 Oct 2026, 21:5611,060-3
23 Oct 2026, 23:2711,063-11
22 Oct 2026, 21:5611,074-12
21 Oct 2026, 22:3411,086-3
20 Oct 2026, 15:5511,089+5
19 Oct 2026, 16:2611,084-14
18 Oct 2026, 12:5611,098-7
17 Oct 2026, 14:3011,105first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 10,951 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,100
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held67 (22 July 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total8,200
Reactions total497
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 20:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
217
Videos
31
Links
73

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 53s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28,502 reactions across 67 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15,03552.8%
🤬4,86217.1%
🗿2,5388.90%
💔2,0567.21%
💅1,1914.18%
🤩9793.43%
🫡7922.78%
😱5681.99%
😭4811.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,502 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,443
across the posts below
Posts paid on
38
of 67 we hold a reading for · 57%
Most on one post
1,020
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kadetovaaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,560 views157 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

То, что книжке Маргариты Симоньян выбрали ещё и самые ущербные дизайн и верстку из возможных — очень символично…

❤157

23 Oct 2026, 10:18 UTC≈5,640 views340 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Да что ж ты будешь делать. Семейную ипотеку прикрыли, теперь и за айтишников берутся. Финансово выгодно в России только СВОшником быть — но есть, как бы, свои нюансы…

🤬291❤35🗿11🫡3

4 Oct 2026, 09:03 UTC≈9,460 views703 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤534💅98🫡58🗿11💔2

28 Sept 2026, 18:57 UTC≈11,100 views706 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

На твой телефон пришло новое сообщение. Посмотри, может там что-то важное…🤭🤭

🗿485🤬150🫡47❤14💔8💅2

28 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC≈9,640 views459 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Какой-то чрезвычайный пиздец происходит сейчас с Александром Кыневым — политологом, электоральным экспертом. Много лет он писал про избирательные кампании их итоги, оставаясь при этом в России и после начала войны. После «выборов» в Госдуму и до своего задержания он успел опубликовать несколько постов с аналитикой, разбирал манипуляции единороссов. Недавно его задержали, вменили очень тяжелую статью. А сейчас выясн…

💔339🤬72🫡35❤13

26 Sept 2026, 09:47 UTC≈7,270 views932 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Сыктывкар, митинг против фальсификаций на «выборах» в Госдуму Люди не признают результаты, требуют отставки губернатора-единоросса и председателя Избиркома, а также привлечения к ответственности всех причастных к нарушениям

❤785🫡84💅44🤬11💔5🗿3

23 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC≈9,070 views573 reactionsread 5 November 2026

И это не ИИ, если что. Путин реально это говорит, но… про Украину :)

🗿435🤬88❤50

23 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC≈9,110 views593 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Путин жестко о ситуации в России после выборов…..

🗿453❤71🫡38🤬18💅7💔6

21 Sept 2026, 20:04 UTC≈9,370 views639 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Кстати, как совпало… Сегодня ведь годовщина объявления первой (и пока единственной) в современной истории России мобилизации. Мобилизованные — самая бесправная и самая быстро вымирающая категория российских солдат на фронте. А те, кому удалось уцелеть, уже 4 года практически безвылазно там сидят.

🤬495💔97❤42💅4🗿1

21 Sept 2026, 15:05 UTC≈7,890 views623 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @yulia_navalnaya_channel

Результаты выборов ожидаемо вызвали большое разочарование, и у меня есть по этому поводу несколько мыслей. Дочитайте, пожалуйста, до конца. Чтобы победить на выборах или проиграть, нужно иметь возможность в них участвовать. Нас этой возможности лишили. Часть оппозиции находится за границей, часть кандидатов отстранили от участия, бОльшую часть голосов воруют, как, например, сейчас в Питере. Это ужасно? Ужасно. Это …

❤468🫡90💔46💅15🗿2🤬2

21 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC≈6,180 views726 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

В общем, выборы украли, доказательств много и будет появляться еще больше. Пал Лаичу принесут в папочке результат и он поверит (потому что хочет верить). Война продолжится и даже пойдет на усиление. Новая мобилизация будет. Скриньте 🙁

🤬523💔131❤69🫡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @kadetovaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Настя Кадетова” (@kadetovaaa), 10,951 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kadetovaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.