Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кафедра УЗД | РМАНПО

Channel

Кафедра УЗД | РМАНПО

@kafedrauzdrmanpo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,235subscribers

+48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001682518957
TypeChannel
Username@kafedrauzdrmanpo
DescriptionИнформационный канал кафедры ультразвуковой диагностики РМАНПО (зав. кафедрой – профессор В.В. Митьков) Ресурс включен в Перечень РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6791fe0facea5b74c4263f77
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kafedrauzdrmanpo

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,16822,23522,201.57 August 2026 — 22,187 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,187 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,188 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,187 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,186 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,182 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,186 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,190 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,187 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,186 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,185 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,186 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,185 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,181 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,180 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,178 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,176 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,178 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,183 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,177 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,172 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,170 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,168 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,173 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,175 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,177 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,181 subscribers9 September 2026 — 22,193 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,203 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,202 subscribers15 September 2026 — 22,199 subscribers17 September 2026 — 22,223 subscribers19 September 2026 — 22,225 subscribers26 September 2026 — 22,235 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,158–22,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 18:5922,235+10
19 Sept 2026, 17:4022,225+2
17 Sept 2026, 05:5722,223+24
15 Sept 2026, 05:2122,199-3
13 Sept 2026, 11:1622,202-1
11 Sept 2026, 15:3822,203+10
9 Sept 2026, 02:1822,193+12
5 Sept 2026, 19:5622,181+4
3 Sept 2026, 22:0222,177+2
2 Sept 2026, 15:3722,175+2
1 Sept 2026, 15:4622,173+5
31 Aug 2026, 15:2622,168-2
30 Aug 2026, 13:2722,170-2
29 Aug 2026, 10:1922,172-5
28 Aug 2026, 11:1322,177-6
27 Aug 2026, 08:1522,183+5
26 Aug 2026, 05:4622,178+2
25 Aug 2026, 06:4222,176-2
24 Aug 2026, 03:2422,178-2
22 Aug 2026, 09:5722,180first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 22,235 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,720
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.986%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held25 (9 May 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total28,600
Reactions total282
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 03:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
375
Videos
14
Links
463

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,310 reactions across 25 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤74556.9%
👍28822.0%
🔥947.18%
🤣584.43%
🙈433.28%
🤯201.53%
👎120.916%
❤‍🔥110.84%
🤝100.763%
🍾60.458%
👌50.382%
👏50.382%
🤔50.382%
🫡40.305%
⚡30.229%
🤓10.076%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 10:38 UTC≈2,960 views22 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги! 💭 Осень – очень насыщенное образовательное время. В конце этой недели, 25 сентября, состоится Конференция с международным участием «Телемедицина в охране здоровья матери и ребенка». Мероприятие будет проведено в рамках Преконгресса «Мать и дитя 2026». Конференция пройдет в онлайн-формате. Регистрационный взнос не взимается – участие бесплатное. Настоящий подарок специалистам, которые занимаются у…

❤18❤‍🔥2👍2

11 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC≈5,580 views64 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги! 🆕 Вчера неалкогольная жировая болезнь печени (НАЖБП) официально стала метаболически ассоциированной жировой болезнью печени (МАЖБП). Пока только у детей. Но явно скоро (при очередном пересмотре соответствующих клинических рекомендаций) эти изменения коснутся и взрослых. Итак, вчера на Портале «Рубрикатор клинических рекомендаций» опубликованы Клинические рекомендации «МАЖБП у детей». ⬇️🔤🔤🔤 https:/…

❤37👍13🔥9🤯5

31 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC≈6,770 views55 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤30👍9🤝8🤯5🍾1👏1🙈1

28 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈7,370 views117 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍66❤36🔥14👏1

15 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈8,520 views20 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги! Вы живете в Сибирском федеральном округе и еще не зарегистрировались на 10-й Съезд специалистов ультразвуковой диагностики, который пройдет осенью в Новосибирске? 16 августа 2026 года – последний день льготной регистрации. Наш Съезд – это прежде всего насыщенная программа, которая охватывает различные разделы ультразвуковой диагностики. Лицо нашего Съезда – это замечательный лекторский состав, пр…

❤12👍6🔥2

16 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC≈9,810 views37 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги! 🆕 В опубликованных неделю назад Клинических рекомендациях «Гемодинамически значимый артериальный проток у недоношенного новорожденного» есть очень много ультразвуковой диагностики. ⬇️🔤🔤🔤 https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/1057_1 ‼️17-страничное приложение (Приложение А3.1 «Ультразвуковая диагностика гемодинамически значимого функционирующего артериального протока») с иллюстрациями (схемы, эхограмм…

❤26🔥8👌3

16 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC≈7,780 views48 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги! Существенная ошибка в одном количественном ультразвуковом критерии Рекомендаций Европейского общества кардиологов по заболеваниям периферических артерий и аорты 2024 г. (2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases), который используют для диагностики гемодинамически значимого стеноза почечных артерий. Правильно ответили 67% (145 из 217) проголосовавших. В Реко…

👍23🤯10❤9🙈4👌1🤔1

13 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC≈6,250 views6 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги! 💭 Продолжаем рецензировать Рекомендации Европейского общества кардиологов по заболеваниям периферических артерий и аорты 2024 г. (2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases). Давайте обратимся к тексту Рекомендаций, который сопровождает алгоритм в части ультразвуковой диагностики стенозов почечных артерий, и сравним текст с самим алгоритмом (скриншоты). 💩💩, в…

❤6

12 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC≈7,300 views26 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги! 💭 Ранее мы знакомили вас с алгоритмом диагностики стенозов почечных артерий из Рекомендаций Европейского общества кардиологов по заболеваниям периферических артерий и аорты 2024 г. (2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases). Подробнее здесь: https://t.me/kafedrauzdrmanpo/476 В алгоритме в качестве метода первой линии диагностики гемодинамически значимого ст…

❤13👍13

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @kafedrauzdrmanpo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кафедра УЗД | РМАНПО” (@kafedrauzdrmanpo), 22,235 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kafedrauzdrmanpo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.