Channel
@kalmatragih
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,941subscribers
-282 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001015735187 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kalmatragih |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kalmatragih |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 13,941 | -9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 13,950 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 13,957 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:42 | 13,960 | -15 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 13,975 | -19 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 13,994 | -33 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 14,027 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 14,037 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:24 | 14,045 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 14,055 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 14,062 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 14,073 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 14,078 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 14,082 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 14,091 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 14,093 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 14,106 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 14,114 | -15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 14,129 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 14,131 | first reading |
165 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 165 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 47,585 |
| Reactions total | 632 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 86 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,439 reactions across 156 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,136 | 78.9% | |
| 💯 | 118 | 8.20% | |
| 💔 | 57 | 3.96% | |
| 🎉 | 42 | 2.92% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 2.64% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 1.46% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 1.04% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.347% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.278% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.208% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 165 of the 165 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,547 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
العطاءُ جميل، لكنْ بِاعتدالٍ ورَوِيَّةٍ، فلا تَجْعَلْهُ يَنْهَشُ صِحَّتَك أو يُرهقُ رُوحَك. ولا تَمْنَحْ عَطَاءَك لِمَنْ لا يَسْتَحِقُّه، فالعَطَاءُ المُستمرُّ بلا تَقْدِيرٍ يَسْتَنْزِفُ رُوحَك ويَتْرُكُك فارغًا مِنَ الطَّاقَةِ.
💯4👍3
🤍
💯7👍1
﴿لَهُ الْحَمْدُ فِي الْأُولَىٰ وَالْآخِرَةِ﴾
❤7
اللهمّ باركْ لنا في أرزاقِنا وأعمالِنا بركةً لا تنقطع، واجعل البركةَ نورًا يُضيءُ خُطانا، وظلًّا يرافقُنا في كلِّ درب، ويسِّر لنا من الخيراتِ ما خفيَ وما ظهر، وما قرُبَ وما بَعُد، وافتح لنا أبوابَ رحمتِك وفضلك من حيثُ لا نحتسب.. #صباح_الخير
❤12
أهمية أذكار الصباح والمساء || الشيخ ابن عثيمين رحمه الله
❤7
اللهم عوّضنا عن كل ما صبرنا عليه، وكل ما تحمّلته قلوبنا بصمت، بأيامٍ تفيض فرحًا، وأخبارٍ تُبشّر أرواحنا، وأقدارٍ جميلة تُنسينا مرارة ما مضى. 🤍
❤9
{ ماعِنْدَكُمْ يَنْفَدُ وَما عِنْدَ اللهِ باقٍ }
❤8
﴿أَلَمْ نَشْرَحْ لَكَ صَدْرَكَ﴾ ومع هدوء الفجر اللهُم بعمق هذه الآية إشرح لي صدري و افرج همي و أرح قلبي ويَسر أمري واشفيني و لا تحملني مالا طاقة لي به يارب سبحانك اللهم وبحمدك، أشهد أن لا إله إلا أنت، أستغفرك وأتوب إليك . #صلاة_الفجر
❤10
عليك أن تتعلم ثقافة التخلّص من كل شيء لا معنى له، زوائد تثقل كاهلك، أصدقاء سيئين مشاعر مؤذية أشخاص لا يشكلون فرقاً بوجودهم، ستجد بعدها مساحة كبيرة بحياتك وأشخاصاً رائعين يشبهونك وإيجابية عالية ستجد الكثير بمجرد حصولك على هذه المساحة، وسيتكفل الله بترتيب كل شيء💕 الوتر + سورة الملك🌷 تصبحون على ماتحبون 💕
❤4🎉2
أرجو أَن تُشفعُ لِي يوماً رقَّةُ قلبي ، وَ مُحاوَلاتًي لِأَن أكونَ شخصاً رحِيماً أنْ لا أُوذي حتى وَ إِن تأذيت ، وَ أَن لا أقسو حين يُقسى علي ، وَ أَن لا أُسئ لأحدٍ حتَى للمُسيئِين أَنفُسهم .🌸
🎉6
في دروب الحياة، لا تُثقِلنا الأعباء بقدر ما تُثقِلنا وحشة الطريق؛ فثقلٌ تخفّ وطأته حين يُحمَل مع قلبٍ صادق، ومسافةٌ تبدو أقصر حين تُقطع برفقةٍ طيّبة، وفرحٌ يزداد بهاءً حين نجد من نقتسمه معه. فالرفقة الصادقة ليست مجرد عابرين نلتقي بهم في الطريق، بل أرواحٌ تُساندنا حين نتعب، وتُهوّن علينا حين تضيق بنا الأيام، وتمنح خطواتنا طمأنينةً لا تُشترى. وما أجمل أن يمضي الإنسان في الحياة وبين يديه قلبٌ يفهمه، وبجواره روحٌ تُشبه…
❤10
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8💔4
Showing the 12 most recent of 165 posts we hold for @kalmatragih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ما أكثر شيء يزعجك في تعامل الناس معك ؟؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
هل تؤمن أن الإنسان يتغير حقًا، أم أنه يبقى على طبيعته الأساسية ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ما أكثر شيء يوصف شخصيتك ؟؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تتمنى تخصيص وقت إضافي أكثر ل ......
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كلمات راقية” (@kalmatragih), 13,941 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalmatragih.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.