Друзья, а Unter den Linden уже висят предвыборные плакаты?

Channel
Мамочка и канцлер
@kanzlermummy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,376subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002121763685 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kanzlermummy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kanzlermummy |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 2,376 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 2,380 | +7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 2,373 | -11 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 2,384 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 2,379 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 2,383 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 2,382 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 2,384 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 2,387 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 2,388 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 2,390 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 2,392 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 2,386 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 2,386 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 34s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
523 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 101 | 19.3% | |
| 😁 | 86 | 16.4% | |
| 👍 | 78 | 14.9% | |
| 😱 | 60 | 11.5% | |
| 😢 | 55 | 10.5% | |
| 🤡 | 34 | 6.50% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 5.93% | |
| 🤬 | 30 | 5.74% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 3.06% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 2.10% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 1.91% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.765% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 0.765% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.382% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.191% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 523 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
20 июля в Германии отмечают день памяти участников немецкого Сопротивления. Т.е. того круга людей вокруг графа Штауффенберга, который безуспешно покушался на Гитлера. И вот уже несколько лет потомки участников cопротивления возмущаются, что представители AfD не только присылают венки, но и не стесняются приходить лично. Попытки этому препятствовать год из года терпят неудачу: протокольная служба федерального правит…
🤯11👍9❤4😱2
Остальные земли: 📌 Baden-Württemberg: „Wir können alles. Außer Hochdeutsch.“ — «Мы можем всё. Кроме литературного немецкого.» 📌 Bayern: „Laptop und Lederhose.“ — «С Ноутбуком и в кожаных штанах.» 📌 Berlin: „be Berlin.“ — «Будь Берлином» или «Стань частью Берлина.» 📌 Brandenburg: „Neue Perspektiven entdecken.“ — «Откройте новые перспективы.» 📌 Bremen: „Bremen erleben!“ — «Почувствуйте Бремен!» 📌 Hamburg: „Das T…
❤18👍7🔥4👎2👏2
Недавно Нижняя Саксония провела ребрендинг. У федеральной земли новый слоган: Niedersachsen. Das ist groß. (Нижняя Саксония. Она большая. Это масштабно.) Правительство земли заложило около десяти миллионов евро на разработку самого слогана и сопроводительные мероприятия: рекламные материалы, дизайн, работа со СМИ и тд. Предыдущий слоган был Niedersachsen. Klar. (Нижняя Саксония. Всё с ней ясно) В 2016 году он обо…
😁32😱23❤1👌1🤡1
(Всё такое вкусное)
- Русский язык в школе23%
- Финансовое образование в школе89%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А вы что выберете?
😁36👏14
🎬 Мой работодатель разыгрывает билеты в кино в Гамбурге. Их там достаточно, разбирайте. О чём фильм? В сбитых над Украиной дронах регулярно находят западные компоненты — в том числе немецкого производства. Как они туда попадают, несмотря на санкции? Разбирался Michael Höft в расследовании „Die Russland-Route“. После показа — разговор с автором, редакцией и экспертами. 🎥 Когда? 📅 6 мая 🕗 20:00 📍 Zeise Kino 🎟 Хоти…
🔥22
Но настоящая немецкая драма разворачивается сейчас далеко от министерских кабинетов и коридоров Бундестага. В Висмарской бухте на песчаной отмели застрял молодой горбатый кит. Вот уже третий день он не может освободиться и скорее всего погибнет, выбившись из сил. Говорят, он погнался за косяком сельди. Из Атлантического океана прошёл через узкие проливы между Данией и Германией попал из в Балтийское море - слишком …
😢54
Удивительно, но система обязательного медстрахования - главный критик предложения отменить бесплатную страховку для супругов 📌 Глава Techniker Krankenkasse Jens Baas: «У нас в системе достаточно денег. Речь не должна идти о том, чтобы забирать у людей ещё больше средств. Нам следует расходовать их более эффективно». 📌 Даниэль Костецко, AOK Nordost: «Федеральное правительство должно (…) участвовать в покрытии растущ…
👍37
Предложение отменить бесплатное страхование супруга:
- Норм! Где ещё кто-то бесплатно получает услугу только потому, что состоит в браке?23%
- Так демографические проблемы Германии они не решат…23%
- Они попутали берега! Пусть оставят семьи в покое и поработают с расходами системы, а не её доходами54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Государственная медстраховка может заметно подорожать для семей Handelsblatt, со ссылкой на источники в правительстве, пишет, что коалиция обсуждает отмену бесплатного совместного страхования для супругов с маленькими доходами. (В духе „Люди готовы приносить жертвы» (с) Ларс Клингбайль) 👉 Сейчас один из партнёров может быть застрахован бесплатно через работающего супруга. 👉 В будущем за это возможно придётся плати…
🤬30🔥5🤡5😱5👍4😁1
Фух, пока я тут в чистом и благополучном Стокгольме, есть кому перманентоно хейтить Берлин за меня. (Если вы чувствуете внутренний барьер и пока так не можете, не переживайте: скоро спадёт пелена ложной благодарности или восхищения, свойственная новоприбывшим и вы тоже сможете ненавидеть Берлин всем сердцем) В FAZ вот вышла статья, и "нет, это не 300 000-й текст ненависти к Берлину, ведь в чувстве ненависти есть вну…
🔥70🤡28😁10👎7❤2🐳2😱2😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kanzlermummy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
(Всё такое вкусное)
- Русский язык в школе23%
- Финансовое образование в школе89%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Предложение отменить бесплатное страхование супруга:
- Норм! Где ещё кто-то бесплатно получает услугу только потому, что состоит в браке?23%
- Так демографические проблемы Германии они не решат…23%
- Они попутали берега! Пусть оставят семьи в покое и поработают с расходами системы, а не её доходами54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@germanworks · 23,161
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
@dwrussian · 50,743
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
@full_brains · 21,979
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
@jobde · 49,780
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@deutsche_gedichte · 23,010
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026
@ilyaryabenkov · 21,318
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мамочка и канцлер” (@kanzlermummy), 2,376 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kanzlermummy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.