Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أنمي و مانجا ونبيس

Channel

أنمي و مانجا ونبيس

@karasu_dz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

20,576subscribers

+528 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002022812868
TypeChannel
Username@karasu_dz
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/karasu_dz

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,04820,57620,3127 August 2026 — 20,048 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,048 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,073 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,083 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,111 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,142 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,173 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,172 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,187 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,208 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,237 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,257 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,274 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,301 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,333 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,347 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,374 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,389 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,387 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,390 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,389 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,386 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,401 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,419 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,425 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,443 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20,461 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,483 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,500 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,533 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,541 subscribers18 September 2026 — 20,576 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +528. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,969–20,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:3720,576+35
16 Sept 2026, 11:5720,541+8
14 Sept 2026, 15:2120,533+33
12 Sept 2026, 23:1620,500+17
10 Sept 2026, 21:5820,483+22
7 Sept 2026, 19:0120,461+18
4 Sept 2026, 20:1820,443+18
1 Sept 2026, 22:5720,425+6
31 Aug 2026, 21:0320,419+18
30 Aug 2026, 20:4820,401+15
29 Aug 2026, 20:2520,386-3
28 Aug 2026, 19:3820,389-1
27 Aug 2026, 21:4520,390+3
26 Aug 2026, 20:1620,387-2
25 Aug 2026, 23:2320,389+15
24 Aug 2026, 23:3320,374+27
23 Aug 2026, 11:1520,347+14
21 Aug 2026, 18:3620,333+32
20 Aug 2026, 13:4320,301+27
19 Aug 2026, 12:1620,274first reading

Engagement

126 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 20,576 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,430
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 126 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held126 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total238,830
Reactions total3,348
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 20s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,450 reactions across 126 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3,86740.9%
1,73218.3%
🤣1,50215.9%
💔4074.31%
🤯3884.11%
🤔3854.07%
😭2422.56%
👏1952.06%
🗿1711.81%
😱1711.81%
🤨1091.15%
🫡570.603%
👀330.349%
320.339%
❤‍🔥320.339%
🕊240.254%
🤩190.201%
🤝110.116%
🌚100.106%
🐳100.106%
10 further kinds530.561%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,450 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 21:37 UTC≈1,350 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026

رسميًا بعد مايصدر الفصل 1192 يصل آرك إلباف لـ 67 فصل منذ بدايته ويصبح بالمركز الخامس كأطول آرك بالقصة ومتبقي فصل واحد ليتعادل مع آرك الإيغهيد بالمركز الرابع 1- آرك وانو : 149 2- آرك دريسروزا : 102 3- آرك الكعكة الكاملة : 78 4- آرك الإيغهيد : 68 5- آرك إلباف : 67 6- آرك جزيرة السماء : 66

🔥1642🤔1

Signed Simo

2 Sept 2026, 18:48 UTC≈2,470 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026

📑جدول مانجا ONE PIECE من الفصل 1192 حتى الفصل 1194 🔶️الفصل 1192 🔶️الفصل 1193 ❌️تأجيل الفصل 1194 ( المجلة ) 🔶️الفصل 1194 ❌️تأجيل الفصل 1195 ( المؤلف - متوقع )

🗿38💔43

Signed MOHAMED FAHMY

2 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC≈3,480 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

اذا استطاع ايمو ان يدمج السيفين وانتج درعا قويا جدا بمجرد ان رآه غابان طلب من الجميع ان يهربو فلحظة ادراك وتخيلوا معي ان يدمج ايمو كل السيوف 19 في سيف واحد فيا ترى ماذا سينتج لنا حرفيا جنون 🔥🔥🔥

🔥515

Signed Simo

2 Sept 2026, 09:55 UTC≈3,850 views73 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

لتفهم مدى قوة الضربه الاخيره التي تلقاها ايمو ضربه هاكوكو ما اثرت بايمو نهائيا وعاد ويقاتل ومافي شي وضربه هاكوكو ضربه حرفيا مدمره وكمان من لوفي ولوكي لاكن الضربه الاخيره موزجت مع قوة برق ودفع لوكي+قوة لوفي وخياله والضربه كانت باعلى هاكي ملكي حرفيا الضربه ذي كانت هتنهي نص شخصيات ون بيس هذا يبرز قوة تحمل ايمو الجنونيه عليه عواقب وخيمة وغير جسده المتهالك رغم ذالك بيقاتل وبيكون هو الطرف المتقدم فالقتال وبالطبع ايمو بيرحع

🔥6310

Signed MOHAMED FAHMY

1 Sept 2026, 18:13 UTC≈4,600 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026

تسريبات اضافيه للفصل ايمو دمج سيفيه ليصيرو لهب اسود يحيط به فا صار درع الفراغ يدمر اي شي يلمسه عندها صرخ غابان قال للجميع اهربو وبعده اخترقه لوفي في صدمة الجميع

🔥736

Signed MOHAMED FAHMY

1 Sept 2026, 18:12 UTC≈4,570 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026

ياسبحان الله

20🤔5🤨1

Signed MOHAMED FAHMY

1 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC≈4,720 views90 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

بالي احنا شايفينه من لوفي وان في ناس مقتنعه ان تيتش اقوى من لوفي تخيل تيتش يواجهه لوفي بالمستوى ذه تخيل بس وفوقها لحد الان لوفي لا يستعمل حتى ربع امكانيات الفاكهه حرفيا تيتش عباره عن حثاله قدام لوفي

58🔥244🤣4

Signed MOHAMED FAHMY

1 Sept 2026, 16:09 UTC≈4,630 views93 reactionsread 3 September 2026

تسريب جديد : في الفصل 1192 بالفعل ايمو قد هاجم فيه لكن هذه ليس مثل المرات السابقه لوفي استطاع ان يصد كل هجماته تقريبا وكان لوفي تغير تماما من ناحيه القوه ليس من ناحيه التفكير او الهزليه فقط من ناحية القوه ازداد كثيرا في القوة وصد هجمات ايمو كان بتقنية غاتالينغ

🔥7010🗿8😢3💔2

Signed Simo

1 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈4,740 views92 reactionsread 3 September 2026

لوفي عمك

🔥66🤣16🕊2🗿2🤝2💔1🤯1😈1

Signed Simo

1 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈4,820 views148 reactionsread 3 September 2026

التسريبات الكتابية الاولية الفصل 1192 🚨🚨: عنوان الفصل 1192: «لن نسامح أبدًا.» - صفحة الغلاف: فرانكي و بعض الكلاب. - يُقذف إيمو بعيدًا ، بينما يطارده لوفي و لوكي. يكشف إيمو عن «درع الفراغ» ، و تُصد لكمة لوفي بواسطة الدرع ، مما يتسبب في نزيف يد لوفي. - يطلب جابان من لوفي أن يهرب ، قائلًا إنه لا جدوى من مواصلة القتال بهذه الطريقة. يظهر أوسوب فجأة على كتف هايرودين و يقول إنهم لا يستطيعون الهرب من إلباف و التخلي عن ا

🔥8716👏15😭12🌚7🤯7🗿4

Signed Abdou🫀🔥

1 Sept 2026, 12:27 UTC≈4,810 views139 reactionsread 3 September 2026

يقول المسرب اوسوب لم يفعل شي بالفصل هو يظهر مع هايردين بجانب لوفي ولوكي ويقول انه جاهز للقتال

🤣77🤯32🗿18🐳64😢2

Signed ABO FAHMY

1 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC≈4,860 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ملصق جديد لأنمي الريميك THE ONE PIECE التسريبات الكتابية الاولية الفصل 1192 اليوم كونو بالموعد 🔥

42🔥19

Signed Abdou🫀🔥

Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @karasu_dz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTCAnonymous Poll2,460 voters approx.

آخر مقارنة لليوم من الأقوى ؟

  1. إيمو61%
  2. كايدو و لوفي وشانكس وميهوك واكاينو ودراغون و تيتش41%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTCAnonymous Poll2,290 voters approx.

من الأقوى في رأيك ؟

  1. لاو72%
  2. ماجلان30%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTCAnonymous Poll2,330 voters approx.

من الأقوى في رأيك؟

  1. لوتشي15%
  2. كاتاكوري87%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أنمي و مانجا ونبيس” (@karasu_dz), 20,576 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karasu_dz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.