Posted without readable text
❤🔥3❤1🔥1

Channel
@karedina_doc_pediatr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
683subscribers
+44 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001687378861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @karedina_doc_pediatr |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/karedina_doc_pediatr |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 683 | +45 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 638 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 639 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 639 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 466 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 24.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 19.7% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 17.1% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 16.2% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 12.0% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤🔥3❤1🔥1
Всегда под рукой связь с педиатром! Можно попасть в мой платный телеграм-чат ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ @karedina_ekaterina_bot
🔥3❤2❤🔥1👏1
Posted without readable text
👍4❤🔥1🔥1
Почему Манту и Диаскинтест — это не прихоть врачей, а ваша страховка? Каждый год родители слышат: «Сделайте пробу». И каждый год находятся те, кто пишет отказ. Мотивация одна: «Ребенок здоров, зачем его травить?» или «Это прививка от туберкулеза, мы не хотим». Важно понять раз и навсегда: ни Манту, ни Диаскинтест не являются прививками. Это диагностические тесты, как градусник, только для определения скрытой инфекц…
👍5❤🔥2🥰2👏1
Красные флаги (когда точно идти к врачу): 1. Ребёнку больше года, а он вообще не использует указательный палец. 2. Он тянет вашу руку к предмету вместо того, чтобы показать пальцем. 3. Он показывает, но никогда не смотрит на вашу реакцию (не делится радостью). А когда у вашего малыша появился указательный жест?
❤🔥2🥰2🔥1
«МОЙ РЕБЕНОК ПОЗДНО ГОВОРИТ - ждать или обращаться к специалисту?» «ОН ПРОСТО РАЗГОВОРИТСЯ. У НАС ПАПА ТОЖЕ ПОЗДНО ЗАГОВОРИЛ…» Эти фразы я слышу от родителей часто. И прекрасно понимаю желание немного подождать. Ведь каждый ребенок развивается в своём темпе. НО❗️есть важный момент: ожидание не должно превращаться в потерю времени. Речь - это не только количество произносимых слов. А ещё и: 🔹 понимает ли ребенок обр…
👍2
Очень актуально!!! Рекомендую почитать блог детского невролога https://t.me/dr_Goltsova
Posted without readable text
❤🔥1👍1🔥1🥰1
Помню, как пахнет больничный коридор — смесью хлорки и валерьянки. Как деревянная палочка, которую мне засовывали в рот, казалась орудием пыток. И этот холодный стетоскоп, от которого я подпрыгивала до потолка. Я боялась педиатра до дрожи в коленках. Каждый визит заканчивался слезами, уговорами мамы и обещанием купить мне «самое лучшее мороженое», если я просто открою рот. А теперь посмотрите на меня. Теперь я — …
❤9❤🔥4👍2🔥1
Posted without readable text
🔥3🥰2❤🔥1
Вчера на приёме был показательный случай. Ко мне пришёл ребенок-подросток с направлением от педиатра: «Холестерин 7,8, ЛПНП высокий, срочно к липидологу!» Мама очень переживала, уже купила специальные йогурты и думала, как урезать бутерброды. Но когда я посмотрела на анализы, меня насторожило другое — не только холестерин, но и незначительное повышение ТТГ (тиреотропного гормона) на фоне нормальных печеночных проб.…
❤5🔥2🥰1
Открытое овальное окно (ООО) — это небольшое отверстие между правым и левым предсердиями сердца. Оно есть у каждого плода в утробе, но после рождения должно зарасти (обычно к 1–2 годам). Если этого не происходит — говорят об ООО. Коротко о сути: · Размер: чаще всего 2–5 мм (меньше, чем при пороке — ДМЖП). · Симптомы: у большинства нет никаких жалоб. Иногда бывают головные боли, головокружения или синюшность губ при…
❤3❤🔥2👌1👍1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @karedina_doc_pediatr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВРАЧ 360° |Каредина Екатерина Федоровна |МОСКВА” (@karedina_doc_pediatr), 683 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karedina_doc_pediatr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.