Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for k.w

Channel

k.w

@karwelllllll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002251810446
TypeChannel
Username@karwelllllll
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/karwelllllll

Growth

2610 Aug 2026, 16:30 — 26 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 08:31 — 26 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 16:3011 Aug 2026, 08:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:3126no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:3026first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
610
Videos
118
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5334976433972342812627.3%
custom 5260450698323044545522.7%
custom 5406703384247953422418.2%
custom 5364197703532169393313.6%
custom 536383714102766942529.09%
custom 536617583232472898229.09%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC14 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

~ 🌟

custom 53349764339723428122custom 52604506983230445451custom 53641977035321693931

10 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC46 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

• • 🤩 как всегда 🤩 - vau 🤩

custom 53641977035321693932custom 52604506983230445451custom 53661758323247289821

6 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC34 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

~🌟 особенный день, для особенного человечка • • @l3gadema

custom 53349764339723428123custom 53638371410276694252custom 53661758323247289821

31 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC51 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 🤩🤩всё что вам надо знать, аромат попкорна 1000/10 🍿 . . (я в восторге) 🤩

custom 54067033842479534224custom 52604506983230445453custom 53349764339723428121

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @karwelllllll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“k.w” (@karwelllllll), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karwelllllll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.