Channel
@katey_v_domike
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
315subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002103766124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @katey_v_domike |
| Created | 16 December 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/katey_v_domike |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 315 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 307 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 308 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 311 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 309 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 312 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 312 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
167 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 40.1% | |
| custom 5346313816193904733 | 37 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5345789813003924508 | 24 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5294283508628341916 | 14 | 8.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 5.99% | |
| custom 5386768551241591131 | 9 | 5.39% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.80% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.80% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хелп ми плиз!!!🙏 Я уже не знаю что делать! У меня не публикуются картинки на пинтерест!!! Совсем!!! Я пробовала и с впн, и без, и других устройств - все равно :( показывает что готово, пин загружен, но в ленте его его нет…. Если знаете как это пофиксить, напишите пожалуйста 😭🙏🏻
custom 53867685512415911319custom 53463138161939047333custom 53457898130039245082
такой свет красивый✨ а цвет волос вообще 10/10
❤11custom 52942835086283419166custom 53463138161939047334custom 53457898130039245081
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ как же мне нравятся эти белые элементы 🙏🏻
❤11custom 53463138161939047337❤🔥5
Ноготочки сделали, стрижечку сделали и побежали с девочками печати собирать 🤩 30к шагов находили, 37 печатей поставили, все на свете обсудили, 10/10 денечек✨🌟
❤9❤🔥5custom 53463138161939047335custom 53457898130039245083
Вливаться в работу после отпуска немного тяжело, но приятно, ведь у меня закончились почти все стикерпаки из нового дропа и остался один коллажный наборчик! Забрать можно тут Чтож, заказываю новую партию и готова показывать вам спойлеры нового дропа! Готовы?🤩
❤6custom 53463138161939047336custom 53457898130039245085
Как ощущается несколько дней ходить с идеей в голове, которая крутиться на шесте и не может принять ту форму, в которой я могу ее понять, И НАКОНЕЦ она вырисовывается и оказывается настолько разъебной, что хочется тут же всему миру рассказать! 🌌 Ох че придумала, офигеть!
❤6custom 52942835086283419164custom 53457898130039245083
новое любимое сочетание - голубой+зеленый 🌱🦋 ищу новые варианты композиции, потому что привычные и любимые уже наскучили, хочется чего-то нового, интересного// у меня любимые места для коллажа - рамка, центр, углы, а у вас?
❤9custom 53463138161939047337custom 53457898130039245083
я так рада, что съездила домой! ощущения будто я там месяц пробыла! +полный детокс от соцсетей +сон до обеда +время с самыми любимыми людьми на свете много гуляли, досмотрели с папой магическую битву, загоняла всех кошек, наелась ягод с куста, поела самые вкусные шашлыки на свете, поклеила блокнотики с сестрой и племяшкой, покаталась на велеке, поиграла со всеми племяниками, короче дел было просто миллион! я наслажд…
❤8custom 52942835086283419164🍓3🕊3
это я замечательно проводила время дома в Яшкино, сейчас уже дома в Питере
❤7custom 53457898130039245087custom 53463138161939047335
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @katey_v_domike. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катей в домике✨” (@katey_v_domike), 315 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katey_v_domike.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.