Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Katie Flotskaya

Channel

Katie Flotskaya

@katie_flotskaya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,523subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001673811922
TypeChannel
Username@katie_flotskaya
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/katie_flotskaya

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,5233,5443,533.57 August 2026 — 3,544 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,544 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,543 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,539 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,536 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,531 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,528 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,526 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,525 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,523 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 36 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,520–3,547 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 06:583,523-2
8 Sept 2026, 08:183,525-1
3 Sept 2026, 09:063,526-2
31 Aug 2026, 03:123,528-3
27 Aug 2026, 20:123,531-5
24 Aug 2026, 16:153,536-3
18 Aug 2026, 03:433,539-4
15 Aug 2026, 08:133,543-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:023,544no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:503,544first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 31 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

199 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10552.8%
😁2110.6%
🔥199.55%
🥰126.03%
👍105.03%
👏84.02%
🎅73.52%
😍52.51%
🍌42.01%
🤩31.51%
👌21.01%
👻21.01%
❤‍🔥10.503%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 12:24 UTC≈2,390 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как быстро сменяются поколения… Ещё как будто вчера моя мама резала оливье под «Иронию судьбы», папа открывал нам детское шампанское, а мы с братом с нетерпением ждали Деда Мороза… А сегодня мы поменялись местами – и на душе одновременно грустно, радостно и очень тепло 🤍 В новом году хочу пожелать вам ценить то, что вы имеете и наслаждаться каждым моментом! ✨

❤43🎅7🍌1🥰1

25 Dec 2025, 16:08 UTC≈1,970 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Пока все заморачиваются, в чем встречать Новый год, я думаю о том, на чем я проснусь в первое утро нового года 🥰 С тех пор как я в первый раз попробовала постельное белье из тенселя у Askona, поняла, что больше не могу спать ни на чем другом! И, кстати, дети у меня такие же чувствительные и тоже спят только на тенселе 😅 И я считаю, что один из самых лучших подарков на новый год для близких – это красивое и качестве…

❤12👍7👻2🍌1

24 Dec 2025, 15:11 UTC≈1,460 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я уже два года не была в настоящей зиме. И в ноябре, когда я в очередной раз пересматривала рождественскую серию «Эмили в Париже», где так красиво и атмосферно показали рождественский Париж – отель Plaza, шале, каток, глинтвейн, свитера и снег – я поняла, что моя душа хочет именно этого состояния - холода, огней, ярмарок и ощущения Рождества ✨ И в тот же день купила нам с мужем билеты на декабрь в Париж и Будапешт и …

❤20👏8🤩3😍3🥰2🍌1

24 Dec 2025, 15:10 UTC969 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤14🥰9😍2

29 Nov 2025, 17:30 UTC≈1,780 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Скандал с Долиной породил новый тренд: россияне массово требуют возврата денег за дорогие покупки и поездки в жаркие страны, потому что якобы действовали под влиянием мошенников. только депутатам не показывайте, а то к понедельнику авиабилеты запретят

😁21❤4🔥2

29 Nov 2025, 17:30 UTC≈1,180 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Успех пришел откуда не ждали 😂 Сегодня утром выложила рилс про авиабилеты и мошенников под песню Долиной и мне уже пересылают паблики с моим видео 😅

🔥2❤1👍1

31 Oct 2025, 14:46 UTC≈1,780 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня у нас в школе был Enterpreneur Market - рынок предпринимателей! И все ученики продавали продукцию, которую сами готовили - печеньки, браслетики, лимонады, магнитики, смузи, сладкую вату, и даже кофе и соль для ванны! А все средства пойдут на благотворительность - корм для бездомных животных. Я в полнейшем восторге!!! От того, как детки подготовились, расклеивали по школе рекламу, раздавали флаеры и это было …

🔥15❤11👌2👍2❤‍🔥1🍌1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @katie_flotskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Екатерина Шрейнер | SchreinerKate | Психолог
@schreinerkate_life · 65,333
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Katie Flotskaya” (@katie_flotskaya), 3,523 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katie_flotskaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.