2026 FIFTY FIFTY Asia Fancon Tour in Singapore [Still LoBubble] π 13 December 2026 β° TBA π TBA π« TBA β¨ Stay tuned for more info! #FIFTYFIFTY @KAvenyou
β€79π26π±11π€6π₯2π1π1π₯°1

Channel
@kavenyou
On this record: Topic Β· Observations Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
34,676subscribers
+678 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001414758953 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kavenyou |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kavenyou |
Music β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
19,100 average views per post against 34,678 subscribers β an engagement rate of 55.2%. Across the 3,503 registered channels in the same cohort β 31,629β99,976 subscribers, posting mainly in English β the middle half sit between 1.78% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.00%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 β 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 23 of 23 published in the window (0 exact, 23 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 440,230 |
| Mature posts only | 57.7% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 34,678 measured 5 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:eng Β· 3,503 channels Β· p10 0.479% Β· p25 1.78% Β· p50 5.00% Β· p75 11.2% Β· p90 20.2% |
| Position in cohort | 99.258th percentile Β· 11.0Γ the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | Β±0.089% of the figure, from Telegramβs rounding |
| Post language | English Β· 100.0% of the windowβs posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3Γ away from that cohortβs median β above it β on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes β audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelβs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 34,676 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:14 | 34,678 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 34,683 | +8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:48 | 34,675 | +7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:51 | 34,668 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:58 | 34,674 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:29 | 34,675 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:59 | 34,677 | +4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:49 | 34,673 | +24 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 34,649 | +7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 34,642 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 34,639 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 34,636 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:28 | 34,635 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 34,637 | +17 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:29 | 34,620 | +8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 34,612 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 34,610 | +8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 34,602 | +12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 34,590 | first reading |
78 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 164 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (27 July 2026 β 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 365,950 |
| Reactions total | 3,513 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 05:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
13,506 reactions across 78 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 10,943 | 81.0% | |
| π | 1,249 | 9.25% | |
| π | 290 | 2.15% | |
| π₯ | 209 | 1.55% | |
| π | 205 | 1.52% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 95 | 0.703% | |
| π± | 83 | 0.615% | |
| π€ | 50 | 0.37% | |
| π€¨ | 44 | 0.326% | |
| π₯΄ | 39 | 0.289% | |
| π | 38 | 0.281% | |
| π | 32 | 0.237% | |
| π₯° | 32 | 0.237% | |
| π’ | 23 | 0.17% | |
| π΄ | 14 | 0.104% | |
| π¦ | 14 | 0.104% | |
| π€© | 12 | 0.089% | |
| π€― | 12 | 0.089% | |
| β | 11 | 0.081% | |
| π€¬ | 11 | 0.081% | |
| 24 further kinds | 100 | 0.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 13,506 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 5 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
2026 FIFTY FIFTY Asia Fancon Tour in Singapore [Still LoBubble] π 13 December 2026 β° TBA π TBA π« TBA β¨ Stay tuned for more info! #FIFTYFIFTY @KAvenyou
β€79π26π±11π€6π₯2π1π1π₯°1
RAZER | FAKER FAN EVENT 2026 π 9 December 2026 π Razer SEA HQ π Stand to meet Faker in person: rzr.to/FakerFanEvent #Faker @KAvenyou
β€116π22π€7β€βπ₯1π1π»1π1
THE KALLANG COUNTDOWN 2027 CONCERT π 31 December 2026 β° TBA π Stadium Roar π« TBA π Stay tuned for more info! #HIGHLIGHT @KAvenyou
β€256π₯14π10π4π₯΄4π₯°3
[π¬ MOVIE] BTS WORLD TOUR 'ARIRANG' LIVE VIEWING FROM KAOHSIUNG AND JAKARTA π 21 November & 29 December 2026 π Golden Village π« S$55 π Tickets go on sale Thursday, 5 November 2026. Stay tuned for more details! #BTS @KAvenyou
π148β€99π₯4π1
CORTIS X TORRIDEN POP-UP STORE IN SINGAPORE π 2 -8 November 2026 π Guardian Takashimaya, #B2-15/20 π¦ CORTIS GWP: Get CORTIS Photo Package with purchase of selected products π¦ GWP with minimum spend (non-stackable with CORTIS GWP) π¦ Exclusive CORTIS photo strip only on 2 & 7 November π¦ Items at 30-40% off; upsized vouchers on selected dates #CORTIS @KAvenyou
β€139π38β€βπ₯14π7π₯°3
[UPDATED] 2026-27 FLARE U FANCON TOUR βWhere UβREβ - SINGAPORE π 23 January 2027 β° 7PM π Capitol Theatre π« S$160 - S$270 β¨ Ticket Sales: 20 November 2026, 12PM via tapyourtickets.com #FLAREU @KAvenyou
β€79π€2π₯1π€©1
[UPDATED] QWER 2nd TOUR ROCKATION : ROCKET LAUNCH!! IN SINGAPORE π 8 & 9 Jan 2027 β° 8PM (8 Jan) & 6PM (9 Jan) π The Theatre at Mediacorp π« S$158 - S$308 π BAWIGE 2nd Membership Pre-Sale Registration Period: 30 October 2026, 12PM - 1 November 2026, 12PM π BAWIGE 2nd Membership Pre-Sale: 10 November 2026, 10AM - 11.59PM π General Sales: 11 November 2026, 10AM via ticketmaster.sg π More information HERE #QWER @KAv
β€54π2π³2π1
KATSEYE: THE WILDWORLD TOUR IN SINGAPORE π 10 February 2027 β° TBA π Singapore Indoor Stadium π« TBA π©· EYEKONS Membership Presale Registration: 29 October 2026, 11AM - 1 November 2026, 12PM (Register HERE) π©· EYEKONS Membership Presale: 10 November 2026, 10AM - 11.59PM via ticketmaster.sg π©· UOB Mastercard World Elite Presale: 11 November 2026, 12PM - 2PM (Find out more HERE) π©· UOB Mastercard Presale: 11 November 20β¦
β€179π148π€¨20π₯΄9π₯4π3π3π2
LE SSERAFIM POP-UP IN SINGAPORE π 20 November 2026 - 6 December 2026 β¨οΈ Stay tuned for more information! #LESSERAFIM @KAvenyou
β€150π15π5π4π2
2026-27 FLARE U FANCON TOUR βWhere U'REβ - SINGAPORE π 23 January 2027 β° TBA π Capitol Theatre π« TBA β¨ Stay tuned for more info! #FLAREU @KAvenyou
β€157π€11π₯4π3π€―3π1π¦1
[π¬ MOVIE] JEONGHAN X JOSHUA JOURNEY INTO DREAMING JAPAN LIVE VIEWING π 22 November 2026 β°οΈ 4PM SGT π Golden Village π« TBA π Receive an A6 postcard with every ticket purchased! (while stocks last) π Tickets go on sale 28 October, 5PM SGT HERE! #SEVENTEEN #JEONGHAN #JOSHUA @KAvenyou
β€152π5π₯2π1
MIGHTEEZ Rock The Stage POP-UP IN SINGAPORE π 21 - 31 October 2026 π SUPER RARE, 313@Somerset #04-30/31 β¨οΈ More information HERE #ATEEZ @KAvenyou
β€134π4π₯3π2π¦2
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @kavenyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@kavenyou edited 12 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegramβs own answer, not this registerβs. When this register asks Telegramβs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it β never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramβs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramβs recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register β how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ°π·πΈπ¬ SG KPop Concerts + Korean Updatesβ (@kavenyou), 34,676 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kavenyou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.