Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 38 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,645–11,853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:18
11,669
-10
16 Sept 2026, 07:18
11,679
-12
14 Sept 2026, 14:01
11,691
+1
13 Sept 2026, 03:58
11,690
-2
11 Sept 2026, 05:36
11,692
+1
8 Sept 2026, 08:16
11,691
-16
5 Sept 2026, 00:41
11,707
+8
3 Sept 2026, 09:18
11,699
-1
2 Sept 2026, 06:23
11,700
-7
1 Sept 2026, 03:59
11,707
-4
31 Aug 2026, 06:34
11,711
-9
30 Aug 2026, 10:03
11,720
-6
29 Aug 2026, 12:14
11,726
-6
28 Aug 2026, 09:33
11,732
-12
27 Aug 2026, 10:12
11,744
-5
26 Aug 2026, 13:06
11,749
+1
25 Aug 2026, 14:33
11,748
-8
24 Aug 2026, 17:13
11,756
-12
23 Aug 2026, 03:23
11,768
-9
21 Aug 2026, 13:25
11,777
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.64%
avg views ÷ 11,669 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.133%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
22 (13 April 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
2,249
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
198 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
146
73.7%
👍
20
10.1%
👏
10
5.05%
🎉
9
4.55%
😁
7
3.54%
🔥
3
1.52%
🥰
2
1.01%
🤩
1
0.505%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 HIRING: Math Content Creator / PPT Designer (Bilingual) 📢
मुझे एक ऐसे candidate (लड़का या लड़की) की तलाश है जो Maths (गणित) के बेहतरीन Level-wise प्रश्न Bilingual (हिंदी + इंग्लिश) में PPT (power point)Format में तैयार कर सके।
Requirements (आवश्यकताएँ):
1. PPT Making: PPT फॉर्मेट में क्वेश्चंस को सही Layout और Font के साथ टाइप करना आना चाहिए।
2. Bilingual Typing: प्रश्न हिंदी और अंग्रेजी दोनों भाषाओं में होने चाहिए।
…
➼ भारत के नौसेना स्टाफ के 48वें उप-प्रमुख (Vice Chief of Naval Staff) के रूप में Vice Admiral Ajay Kochhar ने पदभार ग्रहण किया।
Vice Admiral Ajay Kochhar assumed charge as the 48th Vice Chief of the Naval Staff.
➼ प्रसिद्ध उर्दू शायर बशीर बद्र का निधन हो गया। उन्हें 1989 में पद्म श्री से सम्मानित किया गया था।
Renowned Urdu poet Bashir Badr was awarded the Padma Shri in 1989.
➼ IPL 2026 का फाइनल Royal Challengers Be…
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @kawatramohit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
KD LIVE @kdlive · 158,335 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Spoken English by Neetu Singh @neetu_singh_spoken_english · 217,427 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Neetu Singh Vocab @neetu_singh_vocab · 178,496 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mohit Reasoning” (@kawatramohit), 11,669 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kawatramohit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
