Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Вова Неформатик | Информатика ЕГЭ | ЕГЭХАБ

Channel

Вова Неформатик | Информатика ЕГЭ | ЕГЭХАБ

@kdrshov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,850subscribers

+541 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001856780359
TypeChannel
Username@kdrshov
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kdrshov

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,2546,8506,5527 August 2026 — 6,309 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,301 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,254 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,292 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,272 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,262 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,394 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,675 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,614 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,617 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,697 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,826 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,845 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,850 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +541. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,165–6,939 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:186,850+5
14 Sept 2026, 12:596,845+19
11 Sept 2026, 06:406,826+129
6 Sept 2026, 19:006,697+80
2 Sept 2026, 11:166,617+3
30 Aug 2026, 12:266,614-61
27 Aug 2026, 02:386,675+281
24 Aug 2026, 08:576,394+132
20 Aug 2026, 13:376,262-10
17 Aug 2026, 19:566,272-20
14 Aug 2026, 17:386,292+38
10 Aug 2026, 22:526,254-47
7 Aug 2026, 20:106,301-8
7 Aug 2026, 10:026,309first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 35 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

428 reactions across 35 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16939.5%
6314.7%
🔥4610.7%
❤‍🔥4310.0%
💔409.35%
😈286.54%
🌚92.10%
💋71.64%
🤨71.64%
💅51.17%
👍30.701%
👎20.467%
😁20.467%
👾10.234%
🕊10.234%
😍10.234%
😘10.234%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC310 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что делать с ЕГЭ? ❤️ - отбурмалдить/осеменить 🔥 - оставить 😈 - отменить

23😈11🔥31❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC265 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @maxfizikPhoto

В Правительстве РФ не могут решить, что делать с ЕГЭ) Моё мнение интересует?

31❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC391 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Отправил 2 демоверсии 2018 и 2026 года Посмотрите задания, оцените ваши силы, кажется стало легче или наоборот? ❤️ - стало легче, я легко решу 💔 - кажется стало сложнее

💔1261❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC348 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Раз учиться пока не вайб, почитайте: Как менялся ЕГЭ по информатике и почему современным выпускникам стало одновременно проще и сложнее 👨‍💻 Если бы вы сдавали ЕГЭ по информатике 5–6 лет назад, экзамен выглядел бы совершенно иначе. Сегодня сложно представить, но раньше задания выполнялись полностью на бумаге. Даже программы приходилось писать обычной ручкой. Никакого запуска кода, проверки на тестах или поиска ошиб

31❤‍🔥1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC347 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вайб сегодня к ЕГЭ поготовиться или пока не? ❤️ - да, а то мозг завял 💔 - пока не надо

💔28111

10 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC470 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

я за ЗОЖ и ПП кстати ☝️

11🔥21❤‍🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC472 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10😁21😘1

10 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC498 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Вот сюда подпись бы придумать, вот мои идеи: • что-то с рекурсией и добавить синий экран • хочу стать разработчиком, но кто мне поможет…и бегут такие Claude, Codex, Gemini и Grok Думаю ещё…

🔥9😈31❤‍🔥1💋1

10 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC437 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4😈1

9 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC542 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Последний элитный джентельменский набор высокобальника 😑 самые долгие и неприятные задачи вы не трогаете и набираете 90 баллов 24 - сложный среди всех 22 - неприятный 25 - могут «долго» считаться Где-то зимой на курсе мы с вами начнем изучать сложные номера, однако проходить будем все с нуля ЗАПИСАТЬСЯ

🔥731❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC521 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Почему именно Python для ЕГЭ? 🐍 Каждый год кто-то спрашивает: «Можно ли сдавать на C++? На Java?» Конечно можно. Но если цель получить высокий балл, то Python почти всегда оказывается лучшим выбором! 🎯 Почему так? ⬇️ 💙 На нем нужно писать значительно меньше кода. Это означает: 💙меньше опечаток 💙меньше времени на написание программы 💙больше времени на решение самих задач 💙 Почти все современные разборы, вебинары

41❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC454 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мало реакций, поэтому не покажу Сами смотрите на трансляции KN | VK

4🔥32❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @kdrshov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@kdrshov edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Имаев Артём Флэш | Информатика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@flash_ege · 45,797
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Вика Ланская | Информатика ЕГЭ 2027 | ИнфаВикуся | Умскул
@infa_vikusya · 44,546
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вова Неформатик | Информатика ЕГЭ | ЕГЭХАБ” (@kdrshov), 6,850 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kdrshov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.