Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Keks

Channel

Keks

@kekshubbb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

93,419subscribers

+1,388 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001249345230
TypeChannel
Username@kekshubbb
DescriptionНіхуя собі пацан
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kekshubbb

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

91,65094,57893,1147 August 2026 — 92,031 subscribers7 August 2026 — 92,031 subscribers8 August 2026 — 91,989 subscribers9 August 2026 — 91,954 subscribers10 August 2026 — 91,896 subscribers11 August 2026 — 92,018 subscribers12 August 2026 — 92,040 subscribers13 August 2026 — 91,992 subscribers14 August 2026 — 91,989 subscribers16 August 2026 — 91,938 subscribers17 August 2026 — 91,877 subscribers18 August 2026 — 91,809 subscribers19 August 2026 — 91,762 subscribers20 August 2026 — 91,703 subscribers21 August 2026 — 91,650 subscribers23 August 2026 — 91,802 subscribers25 August 2026 — 91,884 subscribers26 August 2026 — 91,984 subscribers27 August 2026 — 92,056 subscribers28 August 2026 — 92,104 subscribers29 August 2026 — 92,208 subscribers30 August 2026 — 92,238 subscribers30 August 2026 — 92,638 subscribers31 August 2026 — 93,414 subscribers1 September 2026 — 94,132 subscribers2 September 2026 — 94,151 subscribers4 September 2026 — 94,138 subscribers6 September 2026 — 94,136 subscribers10 September 2026 — 94,578 subscribers12 September 2026 — 94,330 subscribers14 September 2026 — 94,186 subscribers15 September 2026 — 94,090 subscribers17 September 2026 — 93,917 subscribers27 September 2026 — 93,419 subscribers93,4197 August 202627 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net +1,388. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91,211–95,017 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 13:1793,419-498
17 Sept 2026, 19:3993,917-173
15 Sept 2026, 14:0194,090-96
14 Sept 2026, 02:0094,186-144
12 Sept 2026, 06:0094,330-248
10 Sept 2026, 00:2294,578+442
6 Sept 2026, 17:2294,136-2
4 Sept 2026, 08:1794,138-13
2 Sept 2026, 23:1594,151+19
1 Sept 2026, 21:5694,132+718
31 Aug 2026, 23:5993,414+776
30 Aug 2026, 23:3592,638+400
30 Aug 2026, 00:2492,238+30
29 Aug 2026, 02:5392,208+104
28 Aug 2026, 00:0292,104+48
27 Aug 2026, 02:1892,056+72
26 Aug 2026, 01:0491,984+100
25 Aug 2026, 02:0291,884+82
23 Aug 2026, 13:0491,802+152
21 Aug 2026, 23:4591,650first reading

Engagement

306 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 93,419 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,200
194 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
194
of 306 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held306 (28 July 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total3,535,430
Reactions total123,746
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Oct 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,250
Videos
≈231
Links
≈304

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 57s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

193,646 reactions across 306 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤103,97753.7%
🤣46,11623.8%
❤‍🔥15,5628.04%
🔥15,1527.82%
👍5,7592.97%
💩3,9242.03%
💔2,3841.23%
🙏7720.399%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 306 of the 306 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193,646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 306 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC≈9,850 views466 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Якщо колись побачите , що в тачки які я передаю пакують людей даю повну згоду на те , щоб ви розбили мені їбало і обісцяти після цього ❗️ Я просто знаю , що тачки які ми передаємо точно не попадають в ТЦК )) Ми як мінімум передаємо особисто їх в руки військових 🤝

❤372🔥40❤‍🔥19🤣18👍16💩1

30 Sept 2026, 11:11 UTC≈10,600 views685 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Файно ??

❤481❤‍🔥89🔥59👍44🤣5🙏5💔1💩1

28 Sept 2026, 20:31 UTC≈17,600 views786 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Video

Легенький обгін ☠️

🔥574❤101🤣66❤‍🔥23🙏10👍6💩6

28 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC≈16,900 views199 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Короче заміряю я собі 100-200 на Hondi і бачу дві машини гонки устроїли і повзуть як черепахи )) Думаю обжену їх легенько ))

❤187👍10❤‍🔥2

28 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTC≈17,400 views662 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

🤝🤝🤝

❤461👍140🤣37🔥15❤‍🔥5💩4

28 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC≈17,400 views195 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

ВІДОС В ПРОФІЛЮЮ 🚔😁 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dd1KmcRIKTF/?stkn=N3NpZzh0azl1bzRm

❤145❤‍🔥26🔥15👍3💩3🤣2🙏1

28 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC≈17,600 views579 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Обідно

🤣484💔50❤29💩12👍4

28 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC≈16,900 views462 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Ви хочете то побачити ?😁

❤358❤‍🔥62👍28💩7🔥7

28 Sept 2026, 10:44 UTC≈17,200 views558 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

А ЦЕ БЛЕК ПОРУШНИК 😈

❤396❤‍🔥81🤣66🔥11👍4

28 Sept 2026, 09:50 UTC≈19,100 views760 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Зараз виглядає так 😍

❤553❤‍🔥130🔥63👍10💩4

28 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC≈18,700 views251 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Пропадав не просто так )) Багато часу виділив на те , щоб зняти відос з Hondoю ! Вона вже прошита і на повній трасі Акраповіч 🔥 Я завалив нахуй їбало від того як він почав їхати після прошивки )) Там уже більше ніж 200 сил на колесііі 😈 Не буду говорити результати почекайте вже випус думаю до вихідних він буде 🤝

❤207❤‍🔥24👍17🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 306 posts we hold for @kekshubbb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTCAnonymous Poll4,810 voters approx.

👇

  1. 00:00 ( через 12 годин )52%
  2. 12:00 ( через 24 години )51%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Sept 2026, 20:40 UTCAnonymous Poll7,070 voters approx.

👇

  1. Insta 360 X620%
  2. PS 536%
  3. IPhone 1730%
  4. Один день зі мною39%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Sept 2026, 19:15 UTCAnonymous Poll8,380 voters approx.

👇

  1. Insta 360 X6 ✅20%
  2. IPhone 17 ✅32%
  3. 500 літрів бензину ✅60%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Sept 2026, 11:08 UTCAnonymous Poll6,710 voters approx.

Alpinestars R10 Full Carbon

  1. З мотоциклом в подарунок ✅57%
  2. Окремо за 2 або 3 місце ✅47%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 306 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Keks” (@kekshubbb), 93,419 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kekshubbb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.