Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کلاردشت

Channel

کلاردشت

@kelariha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,610subscribers

+60 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001063740644
TypeChannel
Username@kelariha
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kelariha

Growth

3,5503,6103,5805 August 2026 — 3,550 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,550 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,552 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,559 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,577 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,574 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,580 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,585 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,594 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,601 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,610 subscribers5 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net +60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,541–3,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 02:183,610+9
1 Sept 2026, 17:583,601+7
29 Aug 2026, 17:163,594+9
26 Aug 2026, 11:543,585+5
23 Aug 2026, 13:543,580+6
19 Aug 2026, 19:033,574-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:593,577+18
13 Aug 2026, 00:343,559+7
9 Aug 2026, 14:133,552+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:353,550no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:383,550first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 20s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

562 reactions across 23 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24844.1%
15828.1%
😡6711.9%
😍437.65%
💔213.74%
🫡71.25%
🔥50.89%
🕊50.89%
💯40.712%
😎20.356%
🤝20.356%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 763 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC304 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

بازی شبانه توله گرگ‌ها در جنگل هیرکانی 🎬 Amirgohardehi 🌋 @kelariha

7😍2

7 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC435 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

بر فراز قله علم‌کوه ۱۴۰۴/۵/۱۶ 🎬 #سعید_عباسیان 🌋 @kelariha

7😍2🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC479 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#تبلیغات تعمیرات لوازم خانگی ابراهیمی در مرزن‌آباد و کلاردشت 🪛🔧تعمیرات در منزل هم انجام می‌ شود. ▫️تعمیر انواع لوازم خانگی برقی و گازسوز ✔️انواع یخچال ✔️ شارژ گاز یخچال ✔️جارو برقی ✔️اتو بخار ✔️ماشین لباسشویی ✔️آبگرمکن ✔️بخاری و..... آقای ایرج ابراهیمی پنجکی 📲09115727457 📲09120565144 📲09359128629

🤝2

7 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC662 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

نحوه برخورد شما نشون دهنده شخصیت شماست اینم از فرهنگی که عده‌ایی پس از سفر به شمال از خودشون به جا میزارن. خجالت بکشید حیف این طبیعت زیبا که گیر شما افتاده💔 #جاده_کلاردشت_عباس‌آباد 🌋 @kelariha

💔18😡15👍1

7 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC619 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سلام به عزیزان کانال کلاردشت در مورد نیاز سنجی و مطالعه قبل از اجرا ،توجه شما رو جلب میکنم به داستان " چرا برج میلاد " مطلبی که دکتر مهدی کوچک زاده نماینده مردم تهران در تاریخ شنبه ۲۸ بهمن ۱۳۹۱ در وبلاگ شخصیش منتشر کرد https://kouchakzadeh.blogfa.com/1391/11 خلاصه اش را براتون مینویسم: در سالهای نه چندان دور در شهر تهران بنیان ساخت برجی با بودجه کلان گذارده شد که امروز به نام برج میلاد میشناسیم. در طرح توجیهی ، دلی

👍123😎1

7 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC584 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

و من همچنان زندگی را دوست دارم؛... تله زوم زیبای چرای گوسفندان در مراتع محدوده قله " کله قندی " #ماسوله_گیلان " سال۱۴۰۳ در سمت چپ خط الراس قله شاه معلم و سمت راست قله تریشم به وضوح قابل رویت است 🎬 #سعید_طیرانی 🌋 @kelariha

😍9🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC594 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

یه شاخه درخت، یه کش، یه تیکه چرم... همینا کافی بود تا ساعت‌ها غرق بازی بشیم تیرکمون فقط یه اسباب‌بازی نبود؛ یه تیکه از کودکی‌مون بود #نوستالژی 🌋 @kelariha

😍131💯1🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC705 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎬 سردآبرود❤ #رودبارک 🌋 @kelariha

12💔2🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC705 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

کلاردشت به پروژه‌های سفارشی نیاز ندارد؛ به تصمیم‌های کارشناسی و اولویت‌بندی واقعی نیاز دارد. در منطقه‌ای که بیش از ۳۰۰ روز سال، شرایط آب‌وهوایی آن برای استفاده از پارک آبی مناسب نیست، باید یک سؤال ساده و جدی مطرح شود: ساخت چنین پروژه‌ای بر اساس کدام مطالعه اقتصادی، نیازسنجی عمومی و مزیت رقابتی کلاردشت توجیه شده است؟ کلاردشت ظرفیت‌های اقتصادی بسیار مهم‌تری دارد. یکی از این ظرفیت‌ها، کشت و توسعه باغ‌های فندق و سایر م

👍252💯2🔥2🫡1

7 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC670 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هر کسی که به کلاردشت سفر می‌کند، برای طبیعت بکر، آب‌وهوای منحصربه‌فرد و آرامش آن می‌آید، نه برای پروژه‌هایی که در هر شهر دیگری هم نمونه‌های بهتر و بزرگ‌ترشان وجود دارد. اما امروز مشکلات اصلی کلاردشت چیست؟ جاده‌های غیراستاندارد و آسفالت نامناسب، قطعی‌های مکرر و طولانی‌مدت آب، ضعف حمل‌ونقل و ایاب‌وذهاب، هزینه بالای زندگی برای مردم بومی، پوشش ضعیف آنتن‌دهی و اینترنت تلفن همراه، کمبود امکانات درمانی و پزشکی، ساخت‌وسازها

👍372

7 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC720 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

در منطقه‌ای که بیش از ۳۰۰ روز از سال شرایط آب‌وهوایی آن برای استفاده از پارک آبی مناسب نیست، ساخت چنین پروژه‌ای تا چه اندازه توجیه اقتصادی و منطقی دارد؟ کلاردشت یکی از مستعدترین مناطق ایران برای کاشت و پرورش فندق است؛ محصولی که امروز در شمار گران‌ترین آجیل‌های کشور قرار دارد. به‌طور میانگین، هر درخت فندق سالانه حدود ۳ تا ۴ کیلوگرم فندق آجیلی تولید می‌کند. اگر حتی قیمت هر کیلو را فقط ۲.۵ میلیون تومان، یعنی کمتر از قیم

👍312

6 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC884 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

غذاپز خورشیدی در افغانستان! 🌋 @kelariha

7🔥3🫡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @kelariha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کلارنا📡
@kelarna · 34,543
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 6 September 2026
چالوس سیتی
@chaluscity1 · 30,822
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Remix_morfine
@remix_Morfine · 247
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کلاردشت” (@kelariha), 3,610 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kelariha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.