Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тот Самый Келин

Channel

Тот Самый Келин

@kelin2play

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,042subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001505248699
TypeChannel
Username@kelin2play
CreatedBetween 1 June 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kelin2play

Growth

11,04211,06111,051.57 August 2026 — 11,058 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,058 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,057 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,059 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,061 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,055 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,061 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,059 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,060 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,053 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,051 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,049 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,051 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,053 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,058 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,050 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,045 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,042 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,046 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,047 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,042 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
21 measurements spanning 29 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,039–11,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 00:1811,042-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:3911,047+1
30 Aug 2026, 07:3311,046+4
29 Aug 2026, 08:0711,042-3
28 Aug 2026, 05:1311,045-5
27 Aug 2026, 02:0411,050-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:4211,058+5
25 Aug 2026, 03:4311,053+2
23 Aug 2026, 23:0711,051+2
22 Aug 2026, 04:0811,049-2
20 Aug 2026, 20:4611,051-2
19 Aug 2026, 23:2211,053-7
18 Aug 2026, 22:1511,060+1
18 Aug 2026, 00:0211,059-2
16 Aug 2026, 21:2411,061+6
15 Aug 2026, 15:1511,055-6
12 Aug 2026, 18:0811,061+2
10 Aug 2026, 12:2711,059+2
9 Aug 2026, 14:1211,057-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:0011,058first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.1%
avg views ÷ 11,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,060
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held23 (22 April 202626 August 2026)
Views total54,370
Reactions total1,516
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,130 reactions across 23 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,56141.8%
🐳71611.7%
👍63110.3%
😁4837.88%
😭3886.33%
🤓2544.14%
🔥2303.75%
❤‍🔥1893.08%
👎1181.92%
🤔801.31%
🎉701.14%
🫡661.08%
🌚370.604%
🤣340.555%
🤯280.457%
🌭250.408%
🦄190.31%
👌150.245%
💯150.245%
💊140.228%
22 further kinds1572.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 23 we hold a reading for · 87%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kelin2play. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 April 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈6,860 views202 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026

Пока я всё равно в производственном раю - есть ли какая-то инфа по играм, которую вам было бы интересно узнать от Mappex? Пишите в комментах 👇

❤‍🔥124👎36🤔2011🥰5🐳4👍1💯1

25 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC≈7,940 views338 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Aaakschually это монфтр хантв лайк а не фоулфлайк келин ты фто гвупый 🤓🤓🤓

🤓253🐳5312👍8🤣5💊2❤‍🔥1🌭1

25 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC≈7,970 views112 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Контекст https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFRL-6efvjk

84🔥7😁5🤔4💊3🤯3👎2🐳1

25 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC≈8,000 views330 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ля вот будет ржака если "сосалик" от Hoyoverse окажется лучше, чем сосалик от фромов

202😁98🐳11👎4💊4🌚3🔥3🥰2

19 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈13,000 views239 reactions4 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Примечательно, что Mortal Shell 2 как раз следует рекомендации выше, и пока фидбек об эксплоринге там куда лучше. Но посмотрим, чё будет на релизной версии Таких историй как с Code Vein/Nioh, к сожалению, огромное количество. Открытый мир Elden Ring, босс-блайнды Balatro, рогаликовая составляющая Hades - и многое другое Даже крупные и, казалось бы, шарящие разработчики просто вслепую копируют хайп без адекватного а

👍16236🔥20🤯6🐳4💅4❤‍🔥32

19 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈10,600 views295 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

"Elden Ring вывел соулс в открытый мир и стал игрой года, давайте тоже так сделаем"

🐳179😁7716🤣7🤔4👎3🔥3🎃2

6 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈17,600 views604 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Спустя 5 лет за бугром изобрели челленджовость https://youtu.be/FLCet4Z7zew

327😁195🌚34🔥14👏11❤‍🔥7👎6🤝3

11 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC≈22,400 views178 reactions4 Starsread 3 September 2026

Отвечу на Серёгин пост Какого-то нерешаемого конфликта я тут на самом деле не вижу - В вакууме чем больше содержания, тем круче - Но чем больше содержания, тем выше порог вхождения. Соответственно, ты режешь круг потенциальных игроков Отсюда следует - Соотношение сути к порогу вхождения - максимизировать. При прочих равных тащит та игра, где больше есть над чем погиковать - независимо от формы - Порог вхождения -

124👍19🌭12🥱7🤔6❤‍🔥5🥴31

1 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC≈21,600 views258 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Довольно частая история на самом деле - и не только в игровой индустрии Парочка полезных чтив - Stay as small as you can - You only compete with one thing

😭178🫡4712❤‍🔥11🐳3😁2🌭1🤝1

17 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTC≈21,600 views546 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Видеоигры - ВСЁ Всё закрываем Сразу после покупки

🐳282😭15537😁30🫡16🤬7💔5💊4

13 Jun 2026, 12:01 UTC≈25,400 views69 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/FA-jqqflYic

👍4811🐳6🤔2😭2

12 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC≈20,800 views115 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026

Так чатик, вы могли заметить, что я на LIVE-канале нарезаю вопросы из амы на шортсы Так вот. Следующий полноценный выпуск AMA чуть задержится, поскольку там будет затронута тема ИИ, и я хочу получше её раскрыть (как раз по причине шортса ниже) Но сейчас в приоритете релизный ролик Mappex'a, поэтому пока буду постить отдельные вопросы Накидайте там комментов, а то после полугодового простоя по стате вообще тухляк

92🐳9🤔5👍3💅3😭2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @kelin2play. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CustomStories
@customstories · 37,392
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
Свежая Булдка
@buldj · 86,217
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тот Самый Келин” (@kelin2play), 11,042 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kelin2play.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.