Channel
@kellek_news
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
208subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002565644689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kellek_news |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kellek_news |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 208 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 207 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 206 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 204 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 205 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 200 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:41 | 200 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 199 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5222299380006031536 | 9 | 42.9% | |
| custom 5222389179182255222 | 6 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| custom 5260554924294443868 | 2 | 9.52% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Владимир Кехтер рассказал о своих впечатлениях от наших банных чанов! Это видео-отзыв на наши банные чаны с точки зрения владельца и строителя многих баз отдыха и банных комплексов, предпринимателя с многолетним опытом и известного эксперта внутри банной тематики. Владимир поделился: • тем, насколько удобны и практичны келлеки в использовании; • средними временем растопки; • общей оценкой наших чанов. Смотрите! 🔥
👍1
«Почему так дорого?» 🛁 Некоторые покупают дешевый чан и осознают, почему он такой дешевый на своем опыте. Мы здесь, чтобы предостеречь вас от такой ошибки. ➡️ Смотрите видео, чтобы понять, как складывается цена и за что вы платите. ✨ Мы в МАХ ✨
custom 52222993800060315363
🔥 Сколько людей предпочитают глэмпинг с чаном? Зависит ли это от сезона? В видео ответили на эти два самых интересных для глэмпинга вопроса. Смотрите! ✨ Мы в МАХ ✨
👍1
Четкие углы, плоские грани и геометрия, задающая настроение всему пространству вокруг. Мы собрали вместе детали, делающие из келлека Cube. ✨ Мы в МАХ ✨
custom 52222993800060315362custom 52223891791822552221
Однозначно, Cube — очень красивый келлек. Но мы думали не только о том, как Cube будет смотреться на вашем участке. Корпусные сидения — в чем их особенность и как они влияют на скорость нагрева воды? ➡️ Объясняем в видео. ✨ Мы в МАХ ✨
custom 52223891791822552222
KELLEK Cube: новый форм-фактор банных чанов. Рекордная скорость нагрева, топка с большим объемом и выносной водяной котел с конвекционными трубками — и всё это в форме, которой у нас ещё не было. ➡️ В карточках — полный обзор модели. Посмотреть видео-обзор: → в VK Видео: https://clck.ru/3TtC6b → на RuTube: https://clck.ru/3Txq6H → на YouTube: https://clck.ru/3TtCw9 Знакомьтесь и с остальными моделями по метке #о…
custom 52222993800060315363custom 52223891791822552223custom 52605549242944438682
Встраивать или не встраивать чан — вот в чем вопрос 🛁 Можно ли встроить чан в террасу? Можно. Но стоит ли — зависит от конкретной ситуации. ✨ В этом видео: почему мы не рекомендуем встраивать чаны классической формы, в каких случаях встраивание всё же оправдано и как это реализовать. ✨ Мы в МАХ ✨
👍1
Теплые детские воспоминания ✨ Спросите любого взрослого о самых теплых моментах детства — и почти никто не вспомнит, как они в одиночестве сидели в комнате, уткнувшись в телевизор или телефон. Мы вспоминаем как было хорошо и безопасно рядом с близкими. 🛁 Банный чан — из тех вещей, которые оседают в памяти навсегда. Летом он может быть маленьким бассейном: желанная прохлада, плеск воды, смех. Зимой — теплым островк…
👍1custom 52222993800060315361
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @kellek_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KELLEK. Банные чаны и продукты для загородного отдыха” (@kellek_news), 208 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kellek_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.