Сходка у моста
❤10👍5
Signed Нина Бескровных

Channel
@keram_kamlak
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,644subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001723609262 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @keram_kamlak |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/keram_kamlak |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 1,644 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 1,645 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 1,644 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 1,641 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 1,640 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 1,639 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 1,640 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 1,643 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 1,646 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 1,645 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 1,646 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 1,646 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
513 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 303 | 59.1% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 9.16% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 8.19% | |
| 😁 | 33 | 6.43% | |
| 😍 | 19 | 3.70% | |
| 🐳 | 16 | 3.12% | |
| custom 5445106911634532028 | 14 | 2.73% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.56% | |
| 🦄 | 8 | 1.56% | |
| custom 5474546395597795514 | 6 | 1.17% | |
| custom 5242569933426029858 | 5 | 0.975% | |
| custom 5456254782719141238 | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.585% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.195% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 513 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сходка у моста
❤10👍5
Signed Нина Бескровных
А я и забыла показать! Ещё три сюрприза добралось до владелиц. Удивительно отважные и удивительные вы люди! Сюрпризы заказываете, это же такой риск, кот в мешке! Бр-р-аслеты носите, бр-р. Всё-таки как здорово, что все мы такие разные. Складываю сюрпризы в этот альбом: https://vk.com/album-65955872_311253450 Если хотите рискнуть, то присылайте вводные: можно выбрать центральный элемент, тему, цвет и тд. И цену, коне…
❤21🔥7😍5👍1
Signed Нина Бескровных
Одолели
❤22🦄8🥰5custom 54745463955977955143custom 52425699334260298581
Signed Нина Бескровных
Традиционное с перевала
❤32👍4😍4
Signed Нина Бескровных
Недавно у нас разверзлись небесные хляби. Да так, что река за один раз вровень с бережком поднялась. За месяц дождей такого не было. Валуны по дну грохотали, а поверху иногда брёвны проскакивали, да всё мимо, эх! Пошли посмотреть на разгул стихии. Собака морду в речку уткнула и то ли ловит кого, то ли наоборот, её кто-то за нос хватает. Что такое? Оказалось — вода с Умкой играет. Всплески ей прямо в мордашку пускае…
❤34🐳11😁10👍5👏2🔥1
Signed Нина Бескровных
«Однажды в школе, классе в четвёртом-пятом, девчонки обсуждали новенькую. И чёрт меня дёрнул добавить своё наблюдение: у неё такие толстые губы! На меня уставились с недоверием. Потом одна выразила общую мысль: наоборот, они у неё очень тонкие. Всю жизнь не запоминала лиц. Потому что не видела их особенностей. Вот и с новенькой, я видела, что губы у неё необычные, но в чём заключалось их своеобразие, не осознавала.…
❤35🐳5custom 54451069116345320285🔥3🤣2👀1👍1😁1
Signed Нина Бескровных
Оказалось, что собирать браслеты — ну очень увлекательно. Правда, сперва норовили собраться бусы, и приходилось половину выкидывать. Единственное, не дано мне понять, зачем носить на руках этакую обузу — хуже только кольца 🙈 В общем, три браслета уже с застёжкой, а четыре пока на ниточке и можно будет определиться и с длиной, и с застёжкой. И что-нибудь добавить или убрать. Итак: ❤️🤎💚 браслет любой длины на любой з…
🔥22❤14👍6😍1
Signed Нина Бескровных
Безобрази учинилось над Лютиком 😾 котик пришёл вечером сквозь хворточку и прилёг на полочке, поразмышлять о вечном. На кресле сверху хозяин им давно полочку прикрутил, Лютик не родился ещё. А корзиночку не сплёл и корытце не выдолбил и перильца не пердусмотрел до сих пор 😾 и котик спа.. размышлял размышлял и вдруг как брякнется обпол! Это что, по-вашему, правильно так делать, чтобы котик падал спя?!? Ай, ай! Не дрем…
❤38😁22custom 54451069116345320289custom 54562547827191412384custom 54745463955977955143👍2🙉2👏1
Signed Нина Бескровных
И правда, удивительный цветок оказался! Днём он никакой, палочки и тряпочки. А к ночи распускается и благоухает. Маттиола двурогая. А ваши открытия покажите?
❤46👍13😍7🔥3🥰3
Signed Нина Бескровных
Дожди надоели ужасно, зато как красиво, когда небо опускается к земле
❤51🔥11👍5custom 52425699334260298584😍2
Signed Нина Бескровных
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @keram_kamlak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Керамика из Камлака. Алтай. Дикая жизнь” (@keram_kamlak), 1,644 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keram_kamlak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.