Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اخبار کرمان

Channel

اخبار کرمان

@kerman_news

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

20,441subscribers

-328 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001067465089
TypeChannel
Username@kerman_news
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kerman_news

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@kerman_news/134879 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC@Kerman_akhbar/642615 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC0.991.7 hours
@kerman_news/134970 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC@Kerman_akhbar/642987 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC0.982.5 hours
@kerman_news/134968 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC@Kerman_akhbar/642977 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC0.982.5 hours
@kerman_news/134877 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC@Kerman_akhbar/642605 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC0.964.4 hours
@kerman_news/134969 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC@Kerman_akhbar/642967 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC0.9271 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Kerman_akhbar5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.972.5 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 46 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Kerman_akhbar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

20,36320,76920,5665 August 2026 — 20,769 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,769 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,766 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,744 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,736 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,725 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,719 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,708 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,702 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,719 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,713 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,710 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,699 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,683 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,672 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,662 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,649 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,648 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,637 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,635 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,626 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,615 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,610 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,598 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,582 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,578 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,567 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,587 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,578 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20,562 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,536 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,516 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,498 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,491 subscribers18 September 2026 — 20,468 subscribers2 October 2026 — 20,363 subscribers7 October 2026 — 20,550 subscribers12 October 2026 — 20,578 subscribers14 October 2026 — 20,592 subscribers15 October 2026 — 20,584 subscribers16 October 2026 — 20,576 subscribers17 October 2026 — 20,572 subscribers18 October 2026 — 20,564 subscribers19 October 2026 — 20,552 subscribers20 October 2026 — 20,545 subscribers21 October 2026 — 20,536 subscribers23 October 2026 — 20,532 subscribers24 October 2026 — 20,535 subscribers25 October 2026 — 20,521 subscribers25 October 2026 — 20,518 subscribers27 October 2026 — 20,505 subscribers28 October 2026 — 20,497 subscribers30 October 2026 — 20,509 subscribers31 October 2026 — 20,506 subscribers1 November 2026 — 20,492 subscribers2 November 2026 — 20,477 subscribers3 November 2026 — 20,472 subscribers4 November 2026 — 20,467 subscribers5 November 2026 — 20,454 subscribers6 November 2026 — 20,441 subscribers20,4415 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,302–20,830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 09:1020,441-13
5 Nov 2026, 06:3120,454-13
4 Nov 2026, 05:0120,467-5
3 Nov 2026, 03:1520,472-5
2 Nov 2026, 06:4120,477-15
1 Nov 2026, 05:5020,492-14
31 Oct 2026, 07:0520,506-3
30 Oct 2026, 06:3920,509+12
28 Oct 2026, 01:0020,497-8
27 Oct 2026, 01:1020,505-13
25 Oct 2026, 22:1920,518-3
25 Oct 2026, 01:1220,521-14
24 Oct 2026, 02:2120,535+3
23 Oct 2026, 01:5020,532-4
21 Oct 2026, 22:4120,536-9
20 Oct 2026, 15:2120,545-7
19 Oct 2026, 11:5420,552-12
18 Oct 2026, 10:3720,564-8
17 Oct 2026, 07:0620,572-4
16 Oct 2026, 07:2720,576first reading

Engagement

1,081 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.39%
avg views ÷ 20,441 subscribers
Avg views / post
692
136 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
136
of 1,081 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 98 of 136 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held1,081 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total94,165
Reactions total437
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 29m
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 232 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,874 reactions across 601 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎99534.6%
😡68323.8%
❤52918.4%
👍2538.80%
💔1424.94%
🔥742.57%
😐722.51%
🤨511.77%
👏291.01%
😱280.974%
🤝110.383%
🙏70.244%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 631 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,874 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 136 posts held from the last 30 days (7.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC566 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔹 بازگشت دکتر سید طاها محمدی 🔹 دلار تا کجا بالا میره؟ طلا بخریم یا صبر کنیم؟ آینده بازار کریپتو چیه؟ دکتر محمدی بعد از چند ماه وقفه دوباره فعالیت خودش رو شروع کرده و تحلیل‌های جدید بازارهای مالی رو در کانال رسمی خودش منتشر میکنه. 📊تحلیل و پیش‌بینی قیمت دلار، طلا، سکه و ارزهای دیجیتال 🌍 بررسی اتفاقات اقتصادی، سیاسی و ژئوپلیتیکی و تأثیر اونها بر آینده بازارها 🎯 پیش‌بینی‌های عددی همراه با راهنمای عملی برای خرید، فر…

👎3❤1

5 Nov 2026, 19:31 UTC140 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

♦️با هم دعای فرج را برای سلامتی و فرج آقا امام زمان(عج) می‌خوانیم 🔹با قرائت دعای فرج به این جمع میلیونی بپیوندیم @AkhbareFori

5 Nov 2026, 19:28 UTC549 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔸 اوقات شرعی فردا جمعه ۱۵ آبان ۱۴۰۵ به افق مرکز استان (احتیاط یک تا دو دقیقه‌ای لحاظ شود.) ‌ 🌱وقت دعا ما رو هم به خاطر داشته باشید🌱 یاحق @kerman_news

😱1

5 Nov 2026, 19:24 UTC521 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

♦️ مروری بر مهمترین اخبار امروز 🔹 دادستان عمومی و انقلاب قلعه‌گنج: صاحب یک فروشگاه مواد غذایی در بازار قلعه‌گنج بر اثر تیراندازی سرنشینان یک خودرو کشته شد و تحقیقات برای شناسایی عاملان ادامه دارد. 🔹 دادستان عمومی و انقلاب زرند: پنج عضو باند سرقت محموله‌های ریلی دستگیر شدند و بیش از دو تن گندم مسروقه از منازل آنان کشف شد. 🔹 فرمانده انتظامی سیرجان: هفت کارگاه ضایعاتی به اتهام خرید اموال مسروقه پلمب و هفت نفر دستگیر …

😡3

5 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC545 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

♦️باران هم نتوانست حضور پرشور مردم جیرفت را متوقف کند؛ ۲۵۰ شب ایستادگی ادامه دارد @kerman_news

👎8❤1

5 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC555 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

♦️پیش‌بینی وضع آب و هوای سه روز آینده مرکز استان 🔹۲۴ ساعت اول (۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۵) 🔹 ۲۴ ساعت دوم (۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۶) 🔹 ۲۴ ساعت سوم (۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۷) @kerman_news

5 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC576 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔹جدیدترین اخبار و اطلاعیه‌های استان کرمان را در کانال‌های زیر دنبال کنید 👇 🔻بله: @kerman_news 🔻سروش: @kerman_news 🔻روبیکا: @kerman_news 🔻ایتا: @kerman_news 🔻اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/kerman_newss

👎1

5 Nov 2026, 18:28 UTC650 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

♦️شهید گمنام مهمان امشب کرمانی‌ها در میدان‌ کوثر @kerman_news

👎6❤1

5 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC673 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

♦️سرلشکر رضایی: ایران گاز روسیه را به کشورهای اطراف خواهد فروخت دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی:­ 🔹در دیدار با آقای پوتین بر سر احداث لوله های گاز از روسیه به ایران بحث شد تا هم ایران کمبودهای گازی را برطرف کند و هم گاز روسیه را به کشورهای اطراف بفروشد @kerman_news

👎6

5 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC656 viewsread 6 November 2026

♦️تکذیب شایعه قطع کالابرگ ۳۰ تا ۴۰ میلیون نفر سخنگوی دولت: 🔹اصلاحاتی در دولت در راستای رویکرد عدالت‌محوری انجام خواهد شد و واجدین شرایط حتما مورد حمایت قرار می‌گیرند. @kerman_news

5 Nov 2026, 17:57 UTC758 viewsread 6 November 2026

♦️ شکست مس رفسنجان در بازی نفس‌گیر مقابل زاگرس جنوبی جهرم 🔹 تیم بسکتبال مس رفسنجان در هفته سوم لیگ برتر بسکتبال باشگاه‌های کشور، در دیداری نفس‌گیر و تا ثانیه‌های پایانی، در سالن خانگی خود مقابل نفت و گاز زاگرس جنوبی جهرم با نتیجه ۸۹ بر ۸۸ شکست خورد تا دو امتیاز حساس خانگی را از دست بدهد. @kerman_news

5 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC750 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

♦️ المیادین: موضوع اصلی در گفتگوهای ژنرال محسن رضایی با رئیس‌جمهور ولادیمیر پوتین در مسکو، پرونده پایان جنگ بود 🔹ایران پیشتر تاکید کرده است تا زمان تحقق کامل شروط هفت‌گانه خود، تنگه هرمز را باز نخواهد کرد و هیچ‌گونه مذاکره‌ای در این زمینه انجام نخواهد شد./ صداوسیما @kerman_news

👎4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,081 posts we hold for @kerman_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 10:51 UTCAnonymous Poll113 voters

نتیجه دربی امشب رو چطور پیش بینی می‌کنید؟

  1. برد استقلال36%
  2. مساوی24%
  3. برد پرسپولیس43%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

اگر برای طرح مسکن ملی ثبت‌نام کرده و مبالغ موردنیاز را پرداخت کرده‌اید. وضعیت فعلی واحد مسکونی شما کدام است؟

  1. مبالغ را پرداخت کرده‌ام، اما هنوز خانه را تحویل نگرفته‌ام.26%
  2. تمام مبالغ را پرداخت کرده‌ام و خانه را تحویل گرفته‌ام.9%
  3. انصراف داده‌ام / به دلیل تأخیر یا مشکلات پروژه، ادامه پرداخت‌ها را متوقف کرده‌ام.57%
  4. بخشی از مبالغ را پرداخت کرده‌ام و پروژه هنوز تکمیل نشده است.22%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTCAnonymous Poll127 voters

آیا مدرسه دولتی، پرداخت وجه را شرط ثبت‌نام فرزندتان قرار داد؟

  1. بله، بدون پرداخت وجه ثبت‌نام نمی‌کردند84%
  2. درخواست پرداخت وجه شد، اما شرط قطعی ثبت‌نام نبود11%
  3. خیر، چنین چیزی مطرح نشد7%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

آیا افزایش سهمیه بنزین به ۱۶۰ لیتر را برای رفع نیاز شهروندان کافی می‌دانید؟

  1. بله کافی است29%
  2. خیر کافی نیست73%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTCAnonymous Poll96 voters

بیشتر از کدام بخش درمان در شهر خود ناراضی هستید؟

  1. هزینه‌های درمان52%
  2. کمبود پزشک متخصص17%
  3. صف و نوبت‌دهی29%
  4. کمبود بیمارستان10%
  5. هزینه دارو49%
  6. امکانات درمانی20%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

با توجه به ویدئوی منتشر شده از صف های طولانی گاز در کرمان و طرح جدید سهمیه بندی، نظر شما چیست؟

  1. این طرح برای مدیریت مصرف و جلوگیری از قاچاق ضروری است.13%
  2. این طرح باعث ایجاد صف و نگرانی برای مردم عادی شده و باید متوقف شود.29%
  3. این طرح یک سناریوی آزمایشی برای گران کردن بنزین در کل کشور است.79%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اخبار کرمان” (@kerman_news), 20,441 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kerman_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.