Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ketzer der Neuzeit

Channel

Ketzer der Neuzeit

@ketzerderneuzeit

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

27,305subscribers

-354 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001421467508
TypeChannel
Username@ketzerderneuzeit
DescriptionKetzerderneuzeit.com
Created1 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ketzerderneuzeit

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

27,30527,65927,4826 August 2026 — 27,659 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,650 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,637 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,632 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,624 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,619 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,611 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,601 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,588 subscribers15 August 2026 — 27,575 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,562 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,554 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,549 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,544 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,536 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,521 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,504 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,492 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,490 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,485 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,483 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,481 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,473 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,466 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,458 subscribers3 September 2026 — 27,448 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,432 subscribers7 September 2026 — 27,403 subscribers10 September 2026 — 27,368 subscribers12 September 2026 — 27,353 subscribers14 September 2026 — 27,338 subscribers16 September 2026 — 27,320 subscribers18 September 2026 — 27,305 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -354. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,252–27,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:0027,305-15
16 Sept 2026, 02:5927,320-18
14 Sept 2026, 09:5827,338-15
12 Sept 2026, 20:0127,353-15
10 Sept 2026, 20:1727,368-35
7 Sept 2026, 16:1527,403-29
4 Sept 2026, 16:0027,432-16
3 Sept 2026, 01:3627,448-10
2 Sept 2026, 02:3327,458-8
1 Sept 2026, 01:4327,466-7
31 Aug 2026, 00:2527,473-8
29 Aug 2026, 03:1627,481-2
28 Aug 2026, 02:4627,483-2
27 Aug 2026, 01:4827,485-5
26 Aug 2026, 04:4227,490-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:2827,492-12
24 Aug 2026, 05:1327,504-17
22 Aug 2026, 09:3827,521-15
20 Aug 2026, 21:3727,536-8
19 Aug 2026, 22:0227,544first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 27,305 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,720
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held22 (20 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total22,870
Reactions total242
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
599
Videos
420
Links
426

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 44s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,022 reactions across 22 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍49848.7%
🙏15315.0%
14213.9%
🔥727.05%
💯504.89%
🤡262.54%
👏171.66%
🤔161.57%
👀121.17%
🥰111.08%
🤣60.587%
🤮40.391%
👎30.294%
🏆20.196%
😁20.196%
🤷‍♂20.196%
10.098%
😈10.098%
😢10.098%
🤓10.098%
2 further kinds20.196%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,022 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 12:58 UTC≈2,120 views30 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Was würde ein AfD-Verbot wirklich auslösen? Im Podcast spreche ich mit Roger Beckamp darüber, was ein mögliches Parteiverbotsverfahren politisch bewirken könnte und ob sich dadurch die Stimmung im Land tatsächlich verändert oder nur neue Dynamiken entstehen. 🎧 Der ganze Podcast auf Youtube: https://youtu.be/lzqvObyU02A?is=GpxUenLLskdRkVwN 🎧 Podcast-Folge auf Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/3uqbwveqbIut8K

🔥19👍74

18 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTC≈4,510 views65 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Ein DJ legt im Club der Hells Angels auf, morgens rührt er Amphetamine in seinen Kaffee. Eine Nacht später fasst er das Zeug nie wieder an. Mein Gast Daniel war auf dem Weg in die Hölle, heute reist er in IS-Hochburgen, um verfolgten Christen zu helfen. 💰 Daniels Mission unterstützen: https://gofund.me/5eb2765e9 🎧 Der ganze Podcast auf Youtube: https://youtu.be/7bkkG6ashVQ 🎧 Podcast-Folge auf Spotify: https://open

👍4212🙏8🤡2🤣1

9 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC≈7,060 views93 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Eine Frau ruft an, um einen Abtreibungstermin zu vereinbaren. Zwei Stunden später hat sich ihr Leben verändert und ihr Kind lebt heute. Am Telefon war mein heutiger Gast Kristijan Affiero: Diplom-Politikwissenschaftler und Gründer der Lebensschutz-Organisation “1000plus”. 🎧 Der ganze Podcast auf Youtube: https://youtu.be/NFTM0_XMnP0?is=XBwXjTbjjoOyL0IS 🎧 Podcast-Folge auf Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/3

👍5436💯2🤡1

26 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈9,180 views54 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Was wäre, wenn jeder Brief vor dem Versand kontrolliert werden könnte? Genau darum geht es bei der Debatte um Client-Side-Scanning: Private Inhalte könnten bereits auf dem eigenen Gerät geprüft werden, bevor sie verschlüsselt verschickt werden. Die entscheidende Frage: Wie weit darf Überwachung gehen, auch wenn sie einem vermeintlich guten Zweck dient? 🎧 Der ganze Podcast auf Youtube: https://youtu.be/6rKgiScs41c

🔥33🙏12🤮4👏21🤡1🤯1

22 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈8,710 views53 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Roger Beckamp saß jahrelang für die AfD im Bundestag und erlebte Angriffe im Wahlkreisbüro, eine beschmierte Haustür und massive Anfeindungen gegen seine Familie. Doch all das war nicht der Grund, warum er sich zurückzog. In diesem Gespräch prallen Politik, Wahrheit und Glaube aufeinander bis ich Roger am Ende eine Frage stelle, auf die seine Reaktion mehr sagt als jede Antwort: „Darf ich für dich beten?“ 🎧 Der ganz

👍3415😁21🤡1

10 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈10,400 views68 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Unsere Handys spionieren uns aus, unsere Festplatten könnten uns ins Gefängnis bringen und Konzerne verkaufen unsere Bewegungsdaten für 10.000 Dollar im Monat. Aber wie schützt man sich davor, wenn selbst der Staat mitliest? Holger ist Cybersecurity-Experte, Unternehmer und war Insider beim Tech-Giganten Microsoft. Also habe ich ihn getroffen und gefragt, was wirklich hinter Palantir, Smart Cities, Chatkontrolle u

💯42👍147👏3🤡1😢1

5 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC≈8,080 views15 reactionsread 23 September 2026

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0SO6kWxKVmcGG6NTDZ4EKN?si=A--NJkGcThS8SiqoPeLsnQ&utm_source=copy-link

👍13🤡2

5 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC≈7,640 views45 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Spricht die Bibel bei Homosexualität tatsächlich nur von Vergewaltigung und Machtgefällen? Der Römerbrief zeichnet ein anderes Bild: Beide entbrennen in Wollust. Es geht also um gegenseitiges Begehren, nicht um einseitigen Missbrauch.

22👍18🤡2🙏2🥱1

2 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈7,790 views18 reactionsread 23 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLLncb98eeM&pp=ygUSa2V0emVyIGRlciBuZXV6ZWl0

👍16👏1🤡1

2 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈6,050 views36 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Christentum? Gerne, solange es im stillen Kämmerlein bleibt… Doch im Glauben müssen auch Aussagen über Sexualität, Gesellschaft oder Politik getroffen werden. Ein Christentum, das öffentlich schweigt, hat mit dem biblischen Auftrag wenig zu tun. 🎙 Den ganzen Podcast mit Tobias Riemenschneider findest du jetzt auf YouTube und Spotify.

👍283🤔3👎1🤡1

31 Jul 2026, 23:03 UTC≈5,480 views25 reactionsread 23 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLLncb98eeM&pp=ygUSa2V0emVyIGRlciBuZXV6ZWl0

👍19🙏3🤣2🤡1

31 Jul 2026, 23:03 UTC≈4,990 views49 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

„Gott hat mich so gemacht.“ Mit diesem Satz lässt sich am Ende jede Begierde rechtfertigen. Doch nicht alles, was wir in uns tragen, entspricht automatisch Gottes Willen. Die Bibel sagt: Gott hat den Menschen gut geschaffen, aber die Sünde hat uns verdorben. Genau deshalb brauchen wir Jesus, der unsere Schuld vergibt und uns neu macht. Den ganzen Podcast mit Tobias Riemenschneider findest du jetzt auf YouTube und S

👍34🙏74🤣2🔥1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ketzerderneuzeit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q124658569 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelKetzer der Neuzeit
DescriptionGerman YouTuber
X / Twitter@dieketzer
YouTubeUCjvVn-oLzoY0aZhVvdQPSTQ

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ketzer der Neuzeit” (@ketzerderneuzeit), 27,305 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ketzerderneuzeit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.