نئو هو و استر یو با لیک های داغ جدیدشون ─✿𝆬─ لویونشی و شروع فصل جدیدش با پایان قرارداد ──── دعوای فنای رنمین و جانگوانیی برا همکاریشون ─✿𝆬─ لویوشیائو با شاهکار جدیدش جویی برمیگرده …

Channel
𝒦𝖾𝗒𝗎'𝗌 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍 / کهیو
@keyuzh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
321subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004397343123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @keyuzh |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 26 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/keyuzh |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 321 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 318 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 315 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 315 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.3%
- avg views ÷ 321 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 68.3
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 15.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (26 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 615 |
| Reactions total | 50 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 56s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
50 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5310292393633794379 | 22 | 44.0% | |
| custom 5310158201675597929 | 20 | 40.0% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 4.00% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
خبرای داغ سیدراما هنوز تموم نشده ‼️
یانگ یانگ با کاسپلی خفنه بازی روح چینی ──── لوشیشیائو تابستون بیپایان در سریال تاریخیش ─✿𝆬─ سریالی که با دیدنش قراره گرفتارش بشی ──── گونگجون و یونینگ فنوارشون رو خاموش کردن …
بخاطر امتحانا و کنکور از خبرای داغ سیدراما بیخبری پس من بهت میگم چه خبره🫵
Sticker, posted without a caption
این لیک ها خیلی ناناز بودن :>
custom 53101582016755979296🍓2💘2custom 53102923936337943792
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⡶⣤⢶⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣷⡠⣽⣦⣄⡀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⡿
custom 531029239363379437910custom 53101582016755979295
⠀😀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣶⡀ 😀⠀⠀⢠⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣤⣾⠏⠘⠿⣦⣤ 😀⠀⠀⣾⠉⠻⢶⠶⠛⢻⡇⠀⠀⠀⠘⢻⡦⠀⠀⢰⡾⠃ 😀⢀⣤⠿⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠷⠿⠿⣾⣷ 😀⢿⣥⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⡆ 😀⠀⠈⠉⣿⣀⣾⠟⠛⠋⠁ 😀⠀⠀⠀⠘⠛⠁
custom 53101582016755979297custom 53102923936337943793💋2
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⡶⣤⢶⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣷⡠⣽⣦⣄⡀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⡿
custom 53102923936337943797🍓2custom 53101582016755979292
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @keyuzh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AoRuipeng_1995 · 9831 post⌜ CDRAMA ALL 🇨🇳 ⌟
@CdramaAll · 1641 post𝑪𝒅𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒆𝒘𝒔 ⋆.ೃ࿔*:・🌿༄
@cdramanews · 7501 post𓏲𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘅𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘅𝘂ଓ
@chenxingxuir · 3711 post𝗗𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗬𝘂𝘅𝗶 ̶͟͞🐾
@Dingyuxii720 · 2,3051 post𓍢ִ໋🌷͙֒ 𝐗𝐮𝐣𝐢𝐚𝐪𝐢
@fan_kiki · 1,2851 post𝐅𝐮 𝐗𝐢𝐧 𝐁𝐨(Look)
@FUXINBO_IR · 4111 post𝗀𝗎𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗓𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗒﹙گلنظࢪ﹚
@gulnezerhq · 2851 post 𝗁𝖾𝗒𝗎 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍﹙ههیو﹚
@heyu_Yiqian · 1,9961 post𝖫𝗎 𝖸𝗎𝖷𝗂𝖺𝗈 ৎ୭
@luyuxiao_fan · 1,1561 post𝖸𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖸𝖺𝗇𝗀杨洋
@MaoStation · 1131 post𝑴𝒆𝒏𝒈 𝒁𝒊𝒚𝒊
@MengZiyiiii · 7841 postنئـــو هـــو دیلیـــ
@Neohou_ir · 1,8221 post ◟ snack attack : پك سيدرامـا
@pin1xer · 6501 postرن مین 𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐦𝐢𝐧 ᴅᴀɪʟʏ
@renmin_iran · 2391 postوانگ شینگ یوئه/Wang Xing yue
@WangXingyue_Update · 4491 post ۫ ᤣ९ 𝗐𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗇 𝖻𝗒 c𝗁𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇
@wgchuran · 1,0821 postپنگــ شیائـوران ᯓ
@xiaoranranrann · 601 post𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐳𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠
@xincheng_ir · 1,0511 postنِئۄلانے پڪ
@xneolani · 7921 postشو جن شوآن / XuZhenXuan / لی بو زه
@Xu_zhenxuan · 2851 post𝖹𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗀 𝖬𝗂𝖺𝗈𝗒𝗂
@ZhangMiaoyi_ir · 581 postZhaojinmai / جائو جین مای
@Zhaojinmai2002 · 1031 post 𝗄𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗅𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗀𝗇﹙کانگلہ﹚
@zklkevin · 2031 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒦𝖾𝗒𝗎'𝗌 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍 / کهیو” (@keyuzh), 321 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keyuzh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.