Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خليك ويانة

Channel

خليك ويانة

@khalik_wianh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,665subscribers

-654 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001100910007
TypeChannel
Username@khalik_wianh
Descriptionمنصّة يديرها مجموعة من الشباب الإعلاميين، بشكل طوعي مستقل، يعملون على دعم المحتوى الهادف. للتواصل من خلال البوت @khalik211bot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2018 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/khalik_wianh

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,66518,31917,9926 August 20268 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -654. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,567–18,417 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 01:1017,665-5
6 Nov 2026, 21:4117,670-9
5 Nov 2026, 19:4017,679-5
4 Nov 2026, 19:1817,684-7
3 Nov 2026, 18:4617,691-7
2 Nov 2026, 18:0117,698-9
1 Nov 2026, 18:3617,707-10
31 Oct 2026, 21:1017,717-4
30 Oct 2026, 22:2917,721-7
30 Oct 2026, 00:5617,728-16
28 Oct 2026, 21:2117,744-6
27 Oct 2026, 18:4617,750-7
26 Oct 2026, 19:0117,757-7
25 Oct 2026, 17:2917,764-5
24 Oct 2026, 20:0817,769-5
23 Oct 2026, 23:0517,774-4
23 Oct 2026, 01:0017,778-6
22 Oct 2026, 02:4817,784-21
20 Oct 2026, 18:1817,805-6
19 Oct 2026, 19:5517,811first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.99%
avg views ÷ 17,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.283%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held24 (1 November 2025 – 13 October 2026)
Views total5,649
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈677
Videos
≈1,460
Links
≈1,770

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 20m
Average length
3m 39s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 24 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7354.9%
👍3627.1%
😢118.27%
👏96.77%
🔥21.50%
😁21.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Oct 2026, 18:46 UTC≈2,380 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

🎬 وثائقي جديد | الحجاب في الغرب: بين حرية الاختيار والمنع 📌 حين تصبح الهوية موضع مساءلة، وحين تواجه حرية اللباس قوانين الإقصاء.. نأخذكم في جولة تحليلية حول قضية الحجاب في المجتمعات الغربية، مستندين إلى تجربة واقعية تفكك الصورة النمطية وتناقش التناقض بين شعارات الحرية والواقع المعاش. 💡 أبرز محاور الفيديو: • الحجاب: تعبير عن قناعة أم رمز للجدل؟ • أثر القوانين والخطابات الرسمية على حياة المسلمات. • تفكيك المفاهيم المسبق…

👍2❤1

13 Oct 2026, 17:14 UTC859 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

المشاهد تتوالى من اذربيجان بعد منع الطلاب والمعلمات من المسلمين الشيعة ارتداء الحجاب في المدارس بسبب علمنة الدراسة واستثناء القلنسوة اليهودية من القرار

😢4

13 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,200 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

أذربيـ..جان المطـ..ـبعة بعد قرار ح.ظر الحـ..جاب ..انهـ..يار فتـ..يات بالبكا ء عند باب المدرسة والجامعات لعد.م السماح لهن بالدخول.

😢6

13 Oct 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,210 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026

💡 عقولٌ تُصلّي في المساجد... وأصابعُ تعبدُ السيلكون! 💡 في زمنٍ سائل، نترنّح بين نزع الحجاب وارتدائه، بين الصلاة ونداء المتعة الفورية على تيكتوك، بين لغة القرآن ولغة العولمة. وثائقي "جيل الضياع" يكشف كيف نرتكب خيانتين سامتين: نخون أجدادنا حين نُسلّم روحنا لـ'حديثٍ' يهدم الأسس، ونخون أبناءنا حين نحبسهم في سرداب 'قديمٍ' يُجمِّد العقل. هل الهوية تابوتٌ نورثه أم نارٌ نوقدها؟ هل يمكن أن نصنع طريقاً ثالثاً؟ طريقاً نأخذ فيه…

❤2👍1

25 May 2026, 09:16 UTC≈4,880 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

هل نحن نعيش داخل "خديعة" عمرها 100 عام؟ 🗺 واقعنا الذي رسمته المسطرة والقلم! هل تساءلت يوماً لماذا تبدو حدودنا العربية مستقيمة وكأنها رُسمت بمسطرة حديدية؟ ولماذا يفصل بين مدننا وتاريخنا خط وهمي لا يعترف بالأرض ولا بالإنسان؟ في الحلقة الجديدة من "خليك ويانة"، نفتح الصندوق الأسود لاتفاقية "سايكس بيكو". نكشف لكم كيف تحولت أحلام العرب بالوحدة إلى كابوس التقسيم، وكيف جلس رجلان في غرف مظلمة لتمزيق "تركة الرجل المريض" وتوز…

❤5

22 May 2026, 14:47 UTC≈4,250 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

هل السماء التي تظلنا هي مجرد غيوم ومطر، أم أنها أصبحت ساحة لمعركة من نوع آخر؟ ⛈📡 في وثائقي جديد ومثير على قناة "خليك ويانة"، نفتح الملف الأكثر جدلاً في العالم: مشروع هارب (HAARP) وسرقة المطر! 🌧🚫 هل تساءلت يوماً لماذا تضرب موجات الجفاف القاسي مناطقنا العربية، بينما تنهمر السيول فجأة وبلا سابق إنذار؟ هل للأمر علاقة بـ 180 هوائياً عملاقاً في أراضي ألاسكا الجليدية؟ في هذا الفيديو نكشف لكم: …

❤5

7 Apr 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,880 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

⭕تاكر يعلق على تغريد ترامب : ▪️"لا يوجد شخص محترم يسخر من أديان الآخرين. عندما تسخر من إيمان الآخرين، فأنت تسخر من فكرة الإيمان ذاتها. نحن لسنا الله، ولا يتحدث المرء بهذه الطريقة إلا إذا كان يظن نفسه إلهاً." ▪️"هذه ليست سخرية من الإسلام، بل هي سخرية من المسيحية. أن ترسل تغريدة تحتوي على بذاءات في صباح عيد الفصح، تَعِد فيها بقتل المدنيين ثم تقول 'الحمد لله'؛ فأنت بذلك تسخر مني ومن كل مسيحي آخر." ▪️"هذا شر؛ إنه تدنيس…

👏6

2 Apr 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,170 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @alnaeemtvVideo

كثير من الكلمات التي تُرمى عليك يومياً ليست مجرد شتائم عابرة.. بل هي "حرب نفسية" مبرمجة لكسر إرادتك، وتشكيكك بعقيدتك، وجعلك تتبرأ من هويتك! 🛑 في هذا المقطع نكشف "فخ المصطلحات" وكيف يستدرجونك للدفاع السلبي والانهزام الداخلي. كيف ترد؟ وكيف تصمد؟ الإجابة في الفيديو 👇 مع #حسين_الخزاعي لا تنهزم من الداخل.. فبيتك فولاذي البنيان! ⚔️ …

❤5😁1

24 Mar 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,970 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

🎥انتقد جيفري ساكس دونالد ترامب وبنيامين نتنياهو بسبب الحرب على إيران، واصفاً إياها بأنها "عدوان بلا سبب" ومحذراً من عواقب عالمية خطيرة.

👍3❤1

23 Feb 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,500 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @alnaeemtvVideo

🌙 شاركونا أجواء صغاركم في "الركن الرمضاني" واربحوا جوائز أسبوعية! ✨ إلى كل الأهالي المبدعين.. هل جهزتم زاوية العبادة والجمال في بيوتكم؟ نريد أن نشارك أطفالكم لحظاتهم الروحانية ونعرضها للعالم! 🎥👦👧 ندعوكم لتصوير فيديوهات قصيرة لأطفالكم وهم يحيون طقوس الشهر المبارك والمشاركة معنا في فقرة #الركن_الرمضاني. تتضمن المشاركات: زينة الركن الرمضاني: تصوير إبداعاتكم في تزيين زاوية الصلاة والقراءة في المنزل. أصوات من السماء: مقاط…

❤3

31 Jan 2026, 18:34 UTC≈5,980 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

ثورة المعلومات.. أم ثورة التفاهة؟ كيف أصبح المحتوى الفارغ تجارة رابحة؟ وُجدت ثورة المعلومات لخدمة البشرية في الصحة والتعليم والإنتاج، لكنها أفرزت وجهاً آخر: "اقتصاد التفاهة". كيف أصبح المحتوى الفارغ هو التجارة الأكثر رواجاً على منصات التواصل الاجتماعي؟ ومن المستفيد من ذلك؟ شاهد الفيديو المرفق لتعرف القصة الكاملة لاقتصاد التفاهة وكيف يؤثر على حياتنا اليوم. للمتابعة على اليوتيوب https://youtu.be/bmfP9NCUiTM #اقتصاد_ال…

❤5😢1

13 Jan 2026, 13:04 UTC≈6,340 views7 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

🔴 شهيدة عكس التيار.. "مرضية" تفضح نفاق العالم "ممرضة إيران.. تختار نار العيادة على أمان الفوضى" بينما كان "المخربون" يلقون الزجاجات الحارقة على عيادة الإمام السجاد (ع) في رشت، كانت الممرضة مرضية نابافينيا ترسم بدمائها خطاً فاصلاً بين "الثورة المزيفة" و"الإنسانية الحقيقية" . ▪️ المشهد: فوضى، نيران، وهروب جماعي.. وفتاة واحدة تركض نحو الداخل لتنقذ كبار السن . ▪️ النتيجة: أنقذت 3 أرواح، وارتقت شهيدة تحت الأنقاض وهي تحاو…

❤7

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @khalik_wianh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

العراق أولا
@iraq_awla · 31,453
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خليك ويانة” (@khalik_wianh), 17,665 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khalik_wianh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.