Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خط قرمز

Channel

خط قرمز

@khat_grmz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

608subscribers

+538 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004478261896
TypeChannel
Username@khat_grmz
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/khat_grmz

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7060833931 August 2026 — 70 subscribers1 September 2026 — 87 subscribers11 September 2026 — 291 subscribers18 September 2026 — 608 subscribers31 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 18 days, net +538. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:20608+317
11 Sept 2026, 03:57291+204
1 Sept 2026, 07:1587+17
31 Aug 2026, 18:1570first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 608 subscribers
Avg views / post
76.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total1,519
Reactions total98
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

98 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3737.8%
👌3232.7%
😢1616.3%
😁1313.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC48 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026

گوزو خان، با این قد یه وجبی؛ چجوری این‌همه ادعا رو حمل می‌کنی؟ .

❤2😁2😢1

31 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 31 August 2026

غلط گیر از خودکار گرون تره مواظب باش اشتباه نکنی .

👌2😁2😢2

31 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC73 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026

یارو با نوکیا ساده مامعله میلیاردی میکنه یکی هم با ایفون ۱۷ شارژ گدایی میکنه 😏 .

❤2👌2😢1

31 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC74 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026

در دنیایی زندگی میکنیم کلمات بیشتر از گلوله آدم میکشه. .

❤2👌2😢1

31 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC96 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026

خانما یه سؤال اقتصادی؛ پروتز باسن هم جزو دارایی‌های ثابت حساب میشه؟ .

👌2😁2❤1

31 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC101 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026

الوو اورژانسِ دل؟ دیگه مسکن جواب نمیده، درد رفته توی استخون... .

👌2😢2❤1

31 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC97 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026

عزیزم بشقابت برای این گوه خوریا زیادی کوچکه. .

😁2😢2

31 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC99 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026

🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️ بدو 🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️ چیزی نیست نگران نباشید دنبال دلار میدم نمی تونم بگیرم.

👌2😁2❤1

31 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026

انقدر تزریق کردی آینه هم موقع دیدنتون مکث می‌کنه .

❤2👌2

31 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026

این همه تغییر تو چهره، فقط مونده کارت ملیتون بگه من اینو نمی‌شناسم .

❤2👌1😁1

31 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC76 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026

نوشته علم بهتر از ثروت است مشتی یه سر به لوازم تحریری سر کوچه بزن . .

❤2👌2

31 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026

زندگیم بوی نماز خونه ی مدرسه پسرونه میده . .

❤3👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khat_grmz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خط قرمز” (@khat_grmz), 608 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khat_grmz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.