مدل دخترونه و ترند وست زیپ خور با طراحی روی الگوی ساده همین مدل رو با پارچه کتان و جین بدوز با یک پنجم قیمت مدلهای آماده و لذتش ببر❤️🔥🔥🔥 خیاطی رویا https://t.me/+QC3wIxHo1uKxi82Y
❤9🥰8⚡1👌1

Channel
@khayati_royanasiri
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,923subscribers
+211 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001076752419 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khayati_royanasiri |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khayati_royanasiri |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 12,923 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 12,927 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 12,929 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 12,925 | -12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 12,937 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 12,946 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 12,947 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:04 | 12,939 | +16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:45 | 12,923 | +29 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 12,894 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 12,890 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 12,885 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 12,878 | +11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:59 | 12,867 | +57 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 12,810 | +35 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 12,775 | +17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 12,758 | +9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 12,749 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 12,751 | +14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 12,737 | first reading |
52 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (2 August 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,291 |
| Reactions total | 152 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
741 reactions across 52 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 521 | 70.3% | |
| 👍 | 149 | 20.1% | |
| 🥰 | 33 | 4.45% | |
| 👌 | 22 | 2.97% | |
| ⚡ | 16 | 2.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 741 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مدل دخترونه و ترند وست زیپ خور با طراحی روی الگوی ساده همین مدل رو با پارچه کتان و جین بدوز با یک پنجم قیمت مدلهای آماده و لذتش ببر❤️🔥🔥🔥 خیاطی رویا https://t.me/+QC3wIxHo1uKxi82Y
❤9🥰8⚡1👌1
از اونجایی که قرار گذاشتیم آموزشهای جدید و قابل اجرای سریع رو براتون آماده کنیم این دو مدل رو طراحی کردم مدلهایی که هم تابستانه میشه دوخت و هم پاییزه و با پارچه های متنوع هر قدر آموزش رو دوست داشتی لایک کن و انرژی بده😍😘 خیاطی رویا https://t.me/+QC3wIxHo1uKxi82Y
❤20🥰3👍2
این مدل عروس فول فشن هم برگزفته از دامن زاک هستش که فقط با تور مخصوص عروس و زیرساز سنگین کارمیش تا این حالت پف دار رو بهش بده مثل دامنهای سوپر اسکارلت که ترم اول عروس کار می کنیم💛🤍 یه نکته خیلی ظریف تو این مدل بهتون بگم؛ کیج این لباس به روش مولاژ پیپرینگ طراحی شده و دوخت کیج کار دست هستش یک کار فوق العاده زیبا و فشن😍💎 https://t.me/+QC3wIxHo1uKxi82Y
👌5❤3👍2
چند نکته هست که اگر رعایتش نکنی،دامنت مدل زاک نمیش‼️ نکته اول✅ آستر کوچیکتر از رویه باشه تا حالت مخروطی درست بشه نکته دوم✅ رویه دامن حتما باید زیرساز جدا داشته باشه تا به ایستایی لازم برسه نکته سوم✅ بین لایه های زاک با تور مخصوص پوشانده بشه نکته چهارم✅ در دامنهای زاک هر مخروط به شکل جداگانه فنردوزی میشه ولی برای این دامن دخترونه به یک روش دیگه ای عمل شده نکته پنجم✅ اندازه ها و گشادی هر قسمت هم رویه هم آستر خیلی …
❤3👍2🥰2
به نظرتون برای دوخت این دامن🤔 میدونی باید چیارو رعایت کنی تا این استایلو داشته باشه لباست؟ فقط پنج نکته هست که با رعایت کردنش میتونی همچین دوخت اصولیی داشته باشی‼️👇🏻👇🏻 از این مدل عروسکیا دوست دارید؟👍 https://t.me/+QC3wIxHo1uKxi82Y
👍12❤4⚡2
اسم این مدل، دامن زاک پوزن. ساختار این دامن بهخاطر فرم خاص و حجم زیادی که ایجاد میکنه، این روزها کمتر در لباسهای عروس استفاده میشه؛ اما من با چند تا تغییر در طراحی و فرم اجرا، همون ساختار رو تبدیل کردم به یه لباس عروسکی، شیک و در عین حال قابل پوشیدن. 👇👇
❤10⚡2
سلام به روی ماهتون 🌷 صبحتون بخیر، امیدوارم امروز رو با حال خوب و انرژی شروع کرده باشید.❤️ امروز میخوام یه مدل متفاوت و خاص رو بهتون معرفی کنم!!! یه مدل فولفشن در لباس عروس که ایدهی اولیهش از یکی از مدلهای قدیمی دامن عروس گرفته شده.💫 دوست دارید بدونید؟ یه قلب بفرستید❤️
❤18
ویژگی های ساتن میکادو انعطاف پذیری بالا ریزش زیاد و فرم گیری برای اکثر مدلها💯 و قابل استفاده برای 99% مدل لباس های مجلسی و عروس💎 ‼️نکته مهم:این پارچه یک سری قلق دوختی داره که اگر رعایت بشه، طراحی مدل رو بیشتر جلوه میده جنسی که داره مناسب تایپ های بدنی از سایز ۳۴ تا ۵۰ هستش🔥
❤11👍2
این پارچه،طی یک سال اخیر که معرفی شد رکورد فروشش رو زد!! حالا چی باعث این حجم از محبوبیت شده🤔 این نوع پارچه تا قبل از معرفی حتی مدلش به ذهن کسی خطور نکرده بود.. و دقیقا همین باعث میشه که یک پارچه تبدیل به یک اثر هنری بشه✨🥰
👍9❤4
میخام با دستمزد دوخت یکبار این لباس ، کلشو فقط به ۱۰۰ نفر آموزش بدم. -اموزش قدم به قدم -الگو کامل -بررسی پارچه -پشتیانی کامل دوره آموزشی -آموزش تصویری از کارگاه حضوری می خوای تو هم تو این گروه باشی؟😍💯 «منم هستم» رو بفرست به آیدی پشتیبانی👇 @poshtibani_nasiri
❤1
پس اگر هدفت اینه که تا اخر امسال، خیاط حرفه ای تر بشی و دوخت لباسهای مجلسی رو اصولی یاد بگیری، ما دقیقاً برای همین مسیر، آموزش های دوخت لباسهای مجلسی رو آماده کردیم. ✂️✨ چون درآمد بیشتر، از آرزو شروع نمیشه؛ از ساختن مهارتهای درست شروع میشه. @poshtibani_nasiri
👍2❤1
اینجاست که یادگیری لباسهای مجلسی اهمیت پیدا میکنه✨. چون لباس مجلسی فقط یک مدل لباس برای دوختن نیست؛ یه مهارته که میتونه تو رو وارد سفارشهای تخصصیتر و باارزشتر کنه. وقتی بتونی یک لباس مجلسی رو از الگو تا برش و دوخت، تمیز و حرفهای اجرا کنی، دیگه فقط دنبال این نیستی که «هر سفارشی گیرم اومد قبول کنم»... کمکم میتونی انتخاب کنی چه لباسی بدوزی، برای چه مشتریای و با چه قیمتی. 💰
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @khayati_royanasiri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@khayati_royanasiri edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش خیاطی|رویا نصیری💜” (@khayati_royanasiri), 12,923 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khayati_royanasiri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.