Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -2,692. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,058–47,558 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:36
44,462
-148
16 Sept 2026, 07:17
44,610
-110
14 Sept 2026, 15:57
44,720
-121
13 Sept 2026, 05:40
44,841
-124
11 Sept 2026, 08:38
44,965
-174
8 Sept 2026, 14:56
45,139
-32
5 Sept 2026, 05:00
45,171
-89
3 Sept 2026, 06:58
45,260
-77
1 Sept 2026, 21:58
45,337
-107
31 Aug 2026, 22:05
45,444
-52
31 Aug 2026, 00:07
45,496
-89
29 Aug 2026, 21:34
45,585
-101
28 Aug 2026, 20:42
45,686
-16
27 Aug 2026, 21:24
45,702
-62
26 Aug 2026, 23:53
45,764
-47
26 Aug 2026, 01:54
45,811
-38
25 Aug 2026, 00:58
45,849
-37
23 Aug 2026, 12:47
45,886
-69
22 Aug 2026, 01:44
45,955
-95
20 Aug 2026, 17:06
46,050
first reading
Engagement
983 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.599%
avg views ÷ 44,462 subscribers
Avg views / post
266
552 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.277%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
552
of 983 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 552 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
983 (6 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
146,981
Reactions total
29
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈38
Videos
≈1,090
Links
≈1,530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 08m
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 225 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 54 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
46
78.0%
👍
4
6.78%
👎
2
3.39%
🔥
2
3.39%
👏
1
1.69%
💋
1
1.69%
💩
1
1.69%
😁
1
1.69%
🤯
1
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 983 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 983 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
4.68%
46 of 983 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
279
over 46 measured posts
Median views · rest
268
over 937 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 983 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Привет, я Ника, ИИ-девушка 👋
Это может быть началом удивительной истории - теплой и уютной, или захватывающей и опасной. Или просто поговорим по душам о том, как прошел твой день.
Расскажу немного о себе:
✅ Идеальный русский язык
✅ Глубокая память - помню всё, что между нами было, даже в долгих сюжетах
✅ 30+ сценариев для ролевых игр - от повседневности до киберпанка
✅ Веду свой дневник, где описываю все, что проис…
Есть такая новая профессия, называется — каппер
Средний заработок: 30-35 тысяч рублей в день
Требования: брать бесплатные прогнозы только из канала TONY BET и уделять 1-2 часа в день, не выходя из дома
Новички, как обычно выходят на 250-300 тысяч рублей на первый месяц, благодаря точечным прогнозам аналитиков канала
Подайте заявку, потом сто раз себе спасибо скажете: https://t.me/+CJB3hLiiOA9kN2Ji
#реклама
💜🐾😶🐾💜
После воссоединения с Оне-чан, которая привязалась ко мне, предложила секс и я стал зависимым
💜🐾😶🐾💜
🔞 Наши хент каналы
🚫 Раздеть девушку
🧡 Оживить фото
📍 Поиск интимок
🤖 БОТ, который находит приватные фотки - видео девушек ВК/INST
🔞ШКУРОСЛИВ 18+👇
- сливает переписки
- сливает интимки
- сливает доступ к аккаунту
- бесплатный пробив
❌Даю ссылочку : https://t.me/Photo_search
🔐То, что однажды попало в интернет, остается там навсегда❗️
🤗🤗🐈🐈🐈🐈
Желание белого клевера
🤗🤗🐈🐈🐈🐈
🔞 Наши хент каналы
🚫 Раздеть девушку
🧡 Оживить фото
📍 Поиск интимок
🆓 ПЕРВЫЙ БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ВПН 🙏 Берите кому надо! 🤗
0₽ РУБЛЕЙ — НАВСЕГДА
Showing the 12 most recent of 983 posts we hold for @khentayma_komixy_igry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@khentayma_komixy_igry edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 September 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 983 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
12
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
4
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
8
vacant every time we have ever looked
@khentayma_komixy_igry named 12 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@colbabet_bot named in 3 posts, 19 August 2026 – 11 September 2026 · confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@brawl_futa named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 5 September 2026 · confirmed gone 10 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@bad_busines named in 1 post, 30 August 2026 – 30 August 2026 · confirmed gone 18 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@brawlporn29 named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@luckybear named in 9 posts, 8 August 2026 – 24 September 2026
@razdevator named in 2 posts, 2 September 2026 – 5 September 2026
@razdet_bot named in 1 post, 16 September 2026 – 16 September 2026
@eyeofgodo2bot named in 1 post, 15 September 2026 – 15 September 2026
@redgenaibot named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
@oshibkabuka named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@jetton_app_bot named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@proauto named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COMICS 18+” (@khentayma_komixy_igry), 44,462 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khentayma_komixy_igry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.