Channel
@khurshidyuldosh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,094subscribers
+54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001736253429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khurshidyuldosh |
| Created | 6 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khurshidyuldosh |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 2,094 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 2,089 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 2,093 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 2,092 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 2,096 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 2,093 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 2,087 | +18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 2,069 | +38 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 2,031 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 2,036 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 2,041 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,040 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 2,040 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Teshik tog‘ora va kosmik kema o‘rtasida sarson Rumiy, Rabg’uziy, Navoiyni nashr qilish uchun ruxsat olish kerakmi? Yuqorigoridagi bu postni o‘qib, undan avval yozgan SI haqidagi gaplarimni esladim, kulgim qistadi: bir qo’limiz bilan kelajakka intilamiz, umuminsoniy va milliy qadriyat va madaniyat haqida gapiramiz, ikkinchi qo‘limiz bilan esa yaqin o‘tmishdan qolgan, absurd tartibotga yopishib olganmiz. Noshir akala…
Aslida SIga mas’uliyat yuklash masalasiga yetib borguncha hal qilinishi yoki yumshatilishi kerak bo‘lgan boshqa muammolar bor: SI insoniy qadriyatlarga muvofiq ishlashini qanday kafolatlaymiz, bias masalasini qanday hal qilamiz va hk. Bularni hal qilmasdan, SIning avtonomligi masalasi ham axloq, ham legal jihatdan muammoli bo‘lib qolaveradi. Biz rivojlanayotgan jamiyat bo’lganimiz sababli biz uchun hozir pragmatik, …
Sun’iy intellekt va mas’uliyat bo‘shlig‘i Mas’uliyat, javobgarlik kabi tushunchalar insonga nisbatan qo‘llab kelingan. Hech kim biror jonsiz narsa yo biror hayvonni biror qilmish uchun mas’ul, javobgar hisoblamagan. Hatto inson ham aqli noqis yoki voyaga yetmagan bo‘lsa, mas’uliyat va javobgarlikdan aksar hollarda ozod qilingan. Mas’uliyat sizning ongli tarzda qaror qabul qilib, shunga muvofiq harakat qilishingiz …
Rumiy va Rabgʻuziy Oʻzbekistonda ruxsatsiz tarqatish mumkin boʻlmagan adabiyotlarmi? Navoiy-chi? Kitob savdosi bilan shugʻullanuvchi doʻkonlar (bularning orasida kitob nashri va savdosiga ixtisoslashgan yirik tarmoqlar ham bor) bir qiziq - va absurd - holatdan shikoyat qilishmoqda. Ularning aytishicha, kitob doʻkonlarini vaqti-vaqti bilan maxsus tekshiruvchilar tekshirib, ozgina diniy mazmundagi (yoki shunga yaqin) …
Nima uchun SI gigantlari faylasuflarni ishga olmoqda? O'n yil oldin gumanitar fanlar talabalariga yaxshi ish topish uchun "kod yozishni o'rganish" maslahat berilardi. Bugun esa vaziyat butunlay o'zgargan: endi sun'iy idrok (SI) tufayli o'z ishidan ayrilishdan dasturchilarning o'zi ko'proq xavotirda. Nyu-York Federal zaxira bankining 2024-yilgi ma'lumotlariga ko'ra, AQShda kompyuter fanlari bitiruvchilari orasida ish…
Butun nega qismlar yig‘indisidan katta? Falsafada shunday bahs bor, “Butun qismlar yig‘indisiga tengmi yoki undan katta?” Shu masala mohiyatini hatto falsafa talabalarining ham mutlaq ko‘pchiligi tushunmasdan o‘qishni bitiradi. Ba’zilar bunga eski, siyqa va hayotdan uzilgan bahs deb qaraydi. “Butun qismlari yig‘indisidan katta” degani qismlarning o‘zaro munosabati har bir qismda yo‘q bo‘lgan xususiyatni paydo qilad…
Farengeyt Press’dan yangi xushxabar Donella Meadows'ning dunyo bo‘ylab millionlab kitobxonlar, menejerlar, tadbirkorlar, siyosatchilar va tadqiqotchilar mutolaa qilayotgan mashhur "Thinking in Systems" asarini o‘zbek tilida nashr etish huquqini olganimizni ma’lum qilamiz. Nega bu kitob muhim? Hayotimizdagi eng katta muammolarning aksariyati alohida hodisalar yoki shaxslar emas, balki tizimlar natijasidir. Nega ti…
Bir qarashda oddiy, ammo amal qilinsa, intellektual saviya va madaniyatni sezilarli oshiradigan qoida va tavsiyalar to‘plami. Sentabr oxirlarida nashr qilinadi. Ayniqsa, talabalarga tavsiya qilaman. Turli muhokamalar, debatlarga qiziqadiganlarga ham asqatadi.
Obro‘li adabiy jurnallardan biri “Granta”da chop qilingan va jurnal mukofotini yutgani aytilgan hikoyani sun‘iy intellekt yozgan ekan. Hikoyani saralashda qatnashgan adabiy ekspertlar uni SI yozganini farqlay olmagan. Nafaqat farqlamagan, ko‘kka ko‘tarib maqtaganlar ham (“precise yet richly evocative”). Nobel laureatlari hikoyalarini bosgan bu jurnal farqlay olmagan soxtalikni adabiyotchi mutaxassis emas, SI bo‘yich…
https://khyuldoshev.wordpress.com/2026/05/31/suniy-intellekt-olamida-insonni-izlash/
Жамият ва виждон Достоевскийнинг кўп асарларида шундай ҳолат учрайди: кимдир бирор ёмон иш қилади, дейлик, одам ўлдиради. Аммо унинг жиноятини ҳеч ким билмайди. Одамлар учун у беайб, пок, баъзилари ҳатто баобрў ҳам. Аммо улар азоб ва зиддият ичида яшайди — айримлари қўлга тушишдан қўрққанидан, бошқалари эса жамиятда қозонган обрўси аслида ўзининг чинакам кимлигига, ўзлигига мос келмаганидан: одамлар мени яхши дейди…
Фактлар гапиради дейишади. Йўқ, фактлар соқов, ўз ҳолича гапиролмайди, балки гапиртирилади. Олим фактни ўз назарий андазасига солиб, умумқабул қилинган методлар асосида изоҳлайди, ундан чиқадиган хулосаларни баён этади. Аммо бу фактнинг эмас, илмий методология ва назариянинг гапиришидир. (Айни бир фактдан икки олим икки хил хулоса чиқариб қўйиши мумкин эмасми?) Фактлар гапириши тарихни ўрганаётганда айниқса ўзига х…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @khurshidyuldosh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“G‘oyalar va soyalar” (@khurshidyuldosh), 2,094 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khurshidyuldosh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.