Channel
@kialsi_confession
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002306926833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kialsi_confession |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 12 December 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kialsi_confession |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 52 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 53 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 52 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 52 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
97 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 30.9% | |
| 🎄 | 20 | 20.6% | |
| ☃ | 10 | 10.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 8.25% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 8.25% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 8.25% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 6.19% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥹subscribe to the channel 🎀 ☺️одслушано рейд комьюнити 🥹** сегодня так опозорились )) 🥹хочу знать что творится в ркм 🥹🤩elcome to @overheardofrcm ☺️менно здесь ты можешь высказаться о том, как заебала или понравилась определённая рейд конфа, пустить слух и быть в курсе всего, что происходит в км !
👎3❤1
⭐ // небольшой камбек старого новостника
❤4
Channel name was changed to «𝗞𝗜𝗔𝗟𝗦𝗜 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 ; 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙»
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ Хих хочу сказать что этот конфликт возрождает рейдкм ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ 🌕// Согласна частично, многие конфликты за последнее время стали придавать ощущения оживленности в данном комьюнити. Но к сожалению гнить это место будет ещё долго хех👎
👍5
😁Напоминаем, что в нашего бота можно высказать свое мнение по поводу какой либо новости, либо же помочь дополнить информацию. @KialsiConfBot
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤❓❗️ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ — Первый канал Киалси вернулся к вам спустя долгое время. Что же произошло за последние сутки? Давайте рассмотрим . . Недавно Акира, овнер свастики, произвел попытку сноса Вистенов успев снести им всего лишь около двухста подписчиков. Некоторые сравнивали Акиру с хэтшотом, другие же - опровергали это. Конфликт из этого вышел не таким уж и долгим, поскольку каждый имел свое мн…
🎄2☃1❤1👍1
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 👐 Что нужно чтобы попасть в админы ( анкета ): – Нахождение в ркм более полугода (будет опрос) – Был ли опыт в новостной сфере? – Почему решили пойти сюда работать и как оценили бы качество своей работы? – Псевдоним и местоимения – Чем могли бы быть полезны и насколько заняты по времени? ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 👐 Писать: @. // Стаж длится неделю, за это время предстоит показать ваше умение работать в данной…
🎄2☃1
🥂От лица всей администрации киалси поздравляем вас с новым годом! Так же мы спешим сообщить о наборе в адм и создании нового обсуждения. Канал постепенно будет возвращаться к работе.
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤❓❗️ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ — искорка в очередной раз подтвердила, что она ебаное позорище в этот раз объектом проеба стал баттл, который она взялась проводить. даже не начав его, она уже наделала ошибок, конкретно — в создании пар. маленькие каналы стоят с большими, аудитория в парах разнится в несколько раз. экзо, решившие принять участие, после этого объявления, ливнули. 🌪🪬:: ками зря вернулас, к…
🤔3☃2❤1🎄1
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤❓❗️ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ ━━ — возвращение "олдов" все же плохое событие? на фоне вернувшихся секачей и рианчиков, которые, как оказалось, были еще цветочками, в рейд комьюнити блещет еще один вернувшийся "олд". по крайней мере ее почему-то так называют: 【👁🗨 мику вернулась:))0)))0 кто же вернется дальше ? я очень рада что олды возвращаются в самом деле ничего особенного во вновь открывшемся кана…
❤2
Самому смешно.
мххсх сука мне одной угарно с федгара и того, как он позорится каждым своим словом?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kialsi_confession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kialsi_confession named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗞𝗜𝗔𝗟𝗦𝗜 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 ; 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙” (@kialsi_confession), 52 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kialsi_confession.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.