Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for what quotes...

Channel

what quotes...

@kichch_whatquotes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

97subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002380627968
TypeChannel
Username@kichch_whatquotes
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kichch_whatquotes

Growth

97101998 August 2026 — 100 subscribers9 August 2026 — 100 subscribers16 August 2026 — 101 subscribers24 August 2026 — 100 subscribers30 August 2026 — 98 subscribers18 September 2026 — 97 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 96–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:1597-1
30 Aug 2026, 22:5798-2
24 Aug 2026, 23:13100-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:52101+1
9 Aug 2026, 10:48100no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:16100first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

348 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11432.8%
🍓7621.8%
👾4111.8%
🔥4011.5%
🥰288.05%
❤‍🔥164.60%
💘164.60%
🆒41.15%
👏41.15%
🤩41.15%
👍10.287%
💋10.287%
💯10.287%
🕊10.287%
🙏10.287%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 348 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kichch_whatquotes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 January 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC65 views36 reactions50 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

старое, хз почему раньше не выложил лучше поздно чем никогда🤩 прямо сейчас рисую каору нянякаву смешного

14🍓7💘6🆒4👾2🔥1🕊1🤩1

8 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC151 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎼«Little Bunny– Zombie Stage» песня мне невероятно понравилась и, как итог, вышло вот это🤝 кроликов рисовать оказалось на удивление приятно

12🔥6🍓5🥰3❤‍🔥1👾1💘1🤩1

16 Jun 2026, 15:35 UTC351 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

быстрый кай монтеаго✍✍

🔥9🥰8👏4🍓31❤‍🔥1👾1🤩1

7 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC388 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👋👋👋

16❤‍🔥11🍓4💘1🤩1

28 May 2026, 14:31 UTC237 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я нарисовал это считай месяц назад, но мне было как-то кринжово выкладывать(и всё еще кринжово, но отсутствие хоть каких-то постов кринжит сильнее.....), поэтому вот так вот🤩 начиная со следующей недели постараюсь вернуться в рабочий режим, но пока на полноценки меня не хватает

👾61🍓1🙏1

28 May 2026, 14:31 UTC202 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🧷OC × Phobia Агорафобия– боязнь открытых пространств Ощущение тревоги от нахождения в месте, из которого невозможно легко выбраться, в котором ощутимо отсутствие контроля над собственной безопастностью и, следовательно, уязвимость. Нежелательными являются как открытые пространства вроде поля, пустыни, так и закрытые, вроде общественного транспорта или лифта– всё, что не предполагает убежища и не гарантирует безопаст

👾75🍓1💋1💘1💯1

13 Apr 2026, 13:56 UTC251 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🗞💌🗞 ничто не дает столько сил, как пятиминутное вдохновение с днем картинки!! а на картинке, собственно говоря, мой персонаж, с которым я(даст бог) напишу одну прикольную штуку когда-нибудь

9🔥8🍓7👾2💘1

28 Mar 2026, 14:49 UTC255 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

не знаю шарит ли тут кто-то, но так или иначе пробовал делать штуки с персонажами из «песнь сорокопута», раньше выложить забыл, но мне благополучно напомнили, так что вот😱

8🍓4🔥3👾2

25 Mar 2026, 13:21 UTC244 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

быстренькие зарисовки с шерлиамами параллельно еще борюсь с полноценкой, пока что она побеждает...🌟

🍓118🥰5👾2🔥1

19 Mar 2026, 20:23 UTC245 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

здравствуйте! у меня пока нет настроения рисовать, но зато я берусь за другие случайные занятия– сегодня это почему-то стихи, которые я писать совершенно не умею, но что поделать, если душа требует? ✨ТВ/КВ: прямое упоминание намерения наложить на себя руки. жестоких сцен нет, здесь хеппи энд. приятного прочтения! ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ🤍🕰🤍 Было смешное что-то в том, чтобы скрывать, Но не было в этом великой цели. В том лишь азарт и

🍓8👾7❤‍🔥31

20 Feb 2026, 13:20 UTC249 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🏵«Этот юноша в самом деле был удивительно красив, и что-то в его лице сразу внушало доверие.» 📌Потрет Дориана Грея 

12👾4🥰4🍓2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kichch_whatquotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“what quotes...” (@kichch_whatquotes), 97 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kichch_whatquotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.