Told y’all this was happening. Market is crazy hot rn and generational opportunities are here. Don’t let them go to waste.
❤11🔥4😁2🙏1

Channel
@killzjourney
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,250subscribers
-545 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002387212930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @killzjourney |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/killzjourney |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 7,250 | -1,079 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 8,329 | -94 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 8,423 | -94 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 8,517 | -96 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 8,613 | -27 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 8,640 | -24 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 8,664 | +931 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 7,733 | -508 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 8,241 | -37 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 8,278 | -76 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 8,354 | +580 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 7,774 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 7,795 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 7,795 | first reading |
52 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (31 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,446 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,110 reactions across 52 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 605 | 54.5% | |
| 🔥 | 154 | 13.9% | |
| 👍 | 98 | 8.83% | |
| 🐳 | 91 | 8.20% | |
| 🙏 | 87 | 7.84% | |
| 😁 | 46 | 4.14% | |
| ✍ | 18 | 1.62% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 0.991% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,110 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Told y’all this was happening. Market is crazy hot rn and generational opportunities are here. Don’t let them go to waste.
❤11🔥4😁2🙏1
+$97.1K in August. $100K monthly goal is basically one good trade away now. Came into this week needing another $30K and somehow almost got it done. Gotta finish the job now.
❤13✍4🐳3🙏1
Getting a Coinbase listing at 30m was impressive on its own Now Binance is showing interest in $BASECAT just two days later Very few memecoins get this level of exchange attention this early.
❤10🙏3🐳2
Imagine “selling the news” before it was even live on Coinbase Now it’s live to 110M+ users. Don’t think they can afford to let this flop.
❤13🙏6🐳4
Official Base account softshilling $BASECAT Cobie and Base crime loading This goes higher.
🐳12❤8
I’ll be posting more plays in here from Monday. $100K this month is more than possible, y’all know I’ve printed 6 fig daily PnLs multiple times before. Time to lock in.
❤11🐳5✍3
+$67.5K first 3 weeks of August. Gotta print another $33k this week to hit my $100K goal for the month. Market is hot and I’m massively up on my SOL holdings since I haven’t stabled for months.
❤11💯4🐳2
Didn’t trade this myself as I don’t trade size plays in this market and stick more to trenching. But y’all are way too delusional if you think Coinbase is listing this just to let it top at 30m. First ever memecoin followed by Cobie too. Way too much aura on the line for $BASECAT to not see 100m+
❤10🐳5🔥1
Slow day on-chain, but still printed Generational opportunities all around us Stay locked in.
❤15🔥8🐳4
+$64K first 14 days of August Just staying patient and taking the trades that make sense. Generational run loading.
❤14👍7😁6🔥3
$BABYSHIB looks ready for a breakout. DOGE did $90B → BabyDoge did $3B with zero DOGE support. SHIB did $45B → now $BABYSHIB is publicly endorsed by SHIB. They follow the project and have publicly replied to it. Connect the dots.
❤15🙏8🔥5🐳1
Nice bounce on our $CATE bags too. Still holding my bag. This is either a 100M mc cook for me or I’ll probably ride it to zero. Conviction stays the same, let’s see how far this goes.
❤12🐳7🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @killzjourney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Killz’s Journey” (@killzjourney), 7,250 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/killzjourney.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.