Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for kimanetwork

Supergroup

kimanetwork

@kimanetwork

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

130members

-106,517 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001519141848
TypeSupergroup
Username@kimanetwork
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kimanetwork

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5106,64753,3267 August 2026 — 106,647 members7 August 2026 — 106,615 members8 August 2026 — 106,466 members9 August 2026 — 106,419 members9 August 2026 — 106,419 members10 August 2026 — 106,352 members11 August 2026 — 106,134 members12 August 2026 — 106,036 members13 August 2026 — 105,969 members14 August 2026 — 105,827 members16 August 2026 — 105,719 members17 August 2026 — 105,578 members18 August 2026 — 105,471 members19 August 2026 — 105,362 members20 August 2026 — 105,293 members21 August 2026 — 105,261 members22 August 2026 — 5 members30 August 2026 — 95 members7 September 2026 — 130 members1307 August 20267 September 2026
19 measurements spanning 31 days, net -106,517. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
7 Sept 2026, 01:42130+35
30 Aug 2026, 01:2795+90
22 Aug 2026, 17:355-105,256
21 Aug 2026, 09:34105,261-32
20 Aug 2026, 12:52105,293-69
19 Aug 2026, 09:35105,362-109
18 Aug 2026, 13:04105,471-107
17 Aug 2026, 12:13105,578-141
16 Aug 2026, 05:13105,719-108
14 Aug 2026, 16:57105,827-142
13 Aug 2026, 09:45105,969-67
12 Aug 2026, 09:32106,036-98
11 Aug 2026, 11:18106,134-218
10 Aug 2026, 07:50106,352-67
9 Aug 2026, 19:24106,419no change
9 Aug 2026, 10:33106,419-47
8 Aug 2026, 14:08106,466-149
7 Aug 2026, 12:28106,615-32
7 Aug 2026, 04:46106,647first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 9 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kimanetwork” (@kimanetwork), 130 members as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kimanetwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.