Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ˚₊‧ ✞ 𝓚𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸 ✞ ‧₊˚

Channel

˚₊‧ ✞ 𝓚𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸 ✞ ‧₊˚

@kinetics_info666

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003906470392
TypeChannel
Username@kinetics_info666
Created26 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 21 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kinetics_info666

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

343.59 August 2026 — 3 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4 subscribers4 October 2026 — 3 subscribers9 August 20264 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 56 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 10:223-1
9 Sept 2026, 22:154+1
13 Aug 2026, 17:463no change
9 Aug 2026, 21:463first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 2 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓1526.8%
👻1119.6%
💋916.1%
💔610.7%
🕊610.7%
☃35.36%
❤‍🔥35.36%
👀35.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC130 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✨𝒽𝒶𝓉 𝒹ℴ 𝓎ℴ𝓊 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓃𝓀 𝒶𝒷ℴ𝓊𝓉 𝓂ℯ?🦴🦴🦴 🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 Вот тут вот можете написать ваше (любое) мнение обо мне!🎀 🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴

☃2🍓1👀1

27 Jun 2026, 10:26 UTC221 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026

✨𝓱𝓸 𝓪𝓻𝓮 𝔂𝓸𝓾?🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 👻 — Друн/подруня 💋 — Знакомый(ая)/приятель(ница) 🕊 — Хотите со мной общаться 💔 — Хейтер 👀 — Незнакомец 🍓 — С одного чата/канала ⛄️ — С учёбы ❤️‍🔥 — Фанат 🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴

🍓14👻11💋9💔6🕊6❤‍🔥3👀2☃1

27 Jun 2026, 09:44 UTC216 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🦴🦴🦴✝✨𝓲𝓷-𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽✝🦴🦴🦴 🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 𝟏. 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐣𝐮 𝐈𝐤𝐚𝐫𝐢 (𝐄𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧) 𝟐. 𝐌𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐨 (𝐃𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐞) 𝟑. 𝐌𝐚𝐞𝐧𝐨 𝐀𝐤𝐢 (𝐙𝐞𝐧𝐨) 𝟒. 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐬𝐮𝐤𝐢 (𝐃𝐃𝐋𝐂) 𝟓. 𝐉𝐢𝐦𝐦𝐲 𝐌𝐜𝐆𝐢𝐥𝐥 (𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐒𝐚𝐮𝐥/𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐚𝐝) 𝟔. 𝐀𝐮𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐲 (𝐎𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐢) 𝟕. 𝐑𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 (𝐌𝐋𝐏) 𝟖. 𝐂𝐥𝐲𝐝𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐧 (𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐤) 𝟗. 𝐀𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐰 𝐍𝐞𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐧 (𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐡) 🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴

26 Jun 2026, 22:05 UTC203 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩✨𝒾𝓃𝑒𝓉𝒾𝒸𝓈🤩🤩🤩 🤩🦴🦴🦴𝓘𝓷𝓯𝓸~🦴🦴🤩 🤩🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🤩 ✨𝟐𝟕.𝟏𝟎 | 🏴 | 🌟 ✨𝐬𝐨/𝐬𝐩 𝟑𝐰𝟒 𝟑𝟓𝟗 (𝐬𝐨𝟑𝐬𝐨𝟓𝐬𝐩𝟗) 𝐅𝐋𝐕𝐄 ✨𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 | 𝐦𝐞 | 𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧 | 𝐝𝐧𝐢 ✨𝐟𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐬 | 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 | 𝐤𝐢𝐧-𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @kinetics_info666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“˚₊‧ ✞ 𝓚𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸 ✞ ‧₊˚” (@kinetics_info666), 3 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinetics_info666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.