#адмтейк 🦨:это капец
❤1🥰1
Signed жестянка бледная
![Telegram profile photo for [набор в админы]KINITOpet CONFESSION](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/8c/8c34d6f348ecc12125613ee43d2a6f3f34329e97a6a9746e8f1d603d442f70cf.jpg)
Channel
@kinitoPETcf1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003794155756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kinitoPETcf1 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 29 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kinitoPETcf1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:06 | 41 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 42 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 41 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 37 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 35 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 35 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 46.7% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 20.0% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#адмтейк 🦨:это капец
❤1🥰1
Signed жестянка бледная
#вп
❤1
Signed жестянка бледная
🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩:: Лайм, у меня появилась одна идея- 🤩:: Я не вылезу, не надейся. 🌟:: Лайм, простой блог, просто общение хотя бы в сети, ладно? 🌟:: Рр.. Ладно!.. Не отвянешь же. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Фанат блаймов? 🌟 Вы по адресу!! Блог лаймового инженера и синего доктора, специально для вас!! Вы можете связаться с ними через почту, или пообщаться в чате блога🤩🤩 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ MP post (0+) Правила Буст Саппорты Синий - …
❤1
Signed жестянка бледная
Video, posted without a caption
🤩3❤1
Signed пердуля 18:16 #шершуля
🦨:
❤3💘1
Signed жестянка бледная
#вп
Signed жестянка
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⭐️Ищᴇтᴇ Mᴇᴄтᴏ ᴄᴏбᴘᴀʜия ʙᴄᴇx xᴏᴘᴘᴏᴘ ȹэʜдᴏMᴏʙ? Дᴏбᴘᴏ пᴏжᴀлᴏʙᴀть.👁⭐️ Приветствуем всё что связано с хоррорами, аналоговыми хоррорами, неправильными портами, и другим! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ NAVIGATION 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 предложка ❕: Откровенная аморальщина
Signed жестянка
кто не отправляет тейки тот лхъ
🔥2
Signed пердуля 18:16 #шершуля
#вп
Signed жестянка
➖➖ыл рейд, был переезд и взлом влд, прошу проверить подписку➖ ртшать это ✏➿➿➿➿✏ 🤩 мне хочется найти аск по разным фандомам , а их нет➖ 🤩 мне не хочется сидеть в разных асках чтобы отвечать и задавать персонажам обычные вопросы, хочется чего то большего, интересного!!! ᛝ 🌟🌟🌟👀👀 — ➖накомы такие мысли➖➖➖ 🌚‼️‼️‼️‼️🤩‼️‼️‼️ 🌚 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🤩🤩➖обро пожаловать в.. 🤩🥹🤩🥹➖➖➖ …
Signed жестянка
#вп
Signed жестянка
🎀 ➖➖➖ – слово знакомое многим. Но вы когда-нибудь задумывались.. – где можно поделиться своим персонажем не получив долю осуждения или негатива? – Моего персонажа снова назвали Мэри Сью!(( – Моего фанон объекта нигде не принимают!! ➖накомо?? вам к нам! 🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧 🎀 ➖➖➖ ➖➖ ➖➖➖ Мы дружное комьюнити SCP фандома, что решили создать примерный кф, где вы можете поделиться своим персонажем или пейрингом со своим персон…
Signed жестянка
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kinitoPETcf1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kinitoPETcf1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[набор в админы]KINITOpet CONFESSION” (@kinitoPETcf1), 41 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinitoPETcf1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.