Поэтому я кстати такой белый, единственный плюс
custom 537333977334994387593

Channel
@kirairll
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14,161subscribers
+2,283 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002469204088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kirairll |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kirairll |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 14,161 | -10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 14,171 | +145 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 14,026 | -46 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:42 | 14,072 | +168 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 13,904 | +76 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 13,828 | +551 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 13,277 | +48 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 13,229 | +32 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:48 | 13,197 | +29 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 13,168 | +16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 13,152 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 13,163 | +14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 13,149 | +36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 13,113 | +123 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 12,990 | +51 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 12,939 | +133 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 12,806 | +132 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 12,674 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 12,682 | +28 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 12,654 | first reading |
66 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (23 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 145,230 |
| Reactions total | 4,093 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,437 reactions across 65 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5373339773349943875 | 10,030 | 80.6% | |
| custom 5255752098590530949 | 2,025 | 16.3% | |
| custom 5413848174013994940 | 382 | 3.07% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,437 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kirairll. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Поэтому я кстати такой белый, единственный плюс
custom 537333977334994387593
И эта ситуация натолкнула меня искренне попросить тех из вас кто чувствуют сильную нехватку сил (легко спутать с депрессией), низкий иммунитет, подавленное состояние и апатия (тоже легко спутать с депрессией) настоятельно рекомендую вам сначала сходить сдать анализ крови, посмотреть на уровень железа и витаминов в вашем организме, не спешите идти сразу к психиатру или психологу так как не все проверяют вас на железо …
custom 537333977334994387596
У меня оказалась железодефицитная анемия, по симптомам схожа с депрессией но имеет физический характер. Так что доктор Стефан сегодня поставит мне укольчик и если это сработает то ждите меня другим человеком, так же сегодня поставил 200 теста, так что можете считать меня хакером теперь
custom 5373339773349943875102
У кого проблема с недействительной ссылкой пишите в лс мне скидывайте скрин оплаты на лава топе, я вам лично выдам - @kirairlllll
custom 537333977334994387556
Пасиба за арт❤️
custom 5373339773349943875373
Кстати запомните, волшебных кнопок по улучшению внешности не существует, в моем гайде собрана база, но эта база работает. Или идите сами на орг и ищите норм инфу среди шизо постов греев)
custom 537333977334994387575
Просто сейчас снова вернулась депрессия, она у меня уже 5 лет и приходит волнами, к сожалению.. Хочу помогать вам но нет сил совсем, простите❤️
custom 5373339773349943875131
Кароче щас я посмотрю че со мной, вколю железа, потому что у меня подозрение на анемию, пропью антидепрессанты и буду пилить для вас гайды наконец-то Напоминаю что у меня уже есть приватка с инфой про снятие отеков и понижению процента жира и моя рутина на весь день, там уже 170 человек и свой закрытый чат. Если интересует могать одноклассников-одногруппников, берите, не пожалеете. ___ >Гайд<
custom 5373339773349943875109
Без формы будут выебаны в раздевалке
custom 5373339773349943875255
Кстати немного моего лора: я учитель физкультуры и обж, кто завтра не прийдет пизды дам
custom 5373339773349943875252
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 537333977334994387567
Блин завтра в школу..
custom 5373339773349943875143
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @kirairll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Трахнуть?
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KIRA👾” (@kirairll), 14,161 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kirairll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.