Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for кирюха

Channel

кирюха

@kiruhaprobiv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,623subscribers

-466 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002740450789
TypeChannel
Username@kiruhaprobiv
Created28 June 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kiruhaprobiv

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,6237,1876,9057 August 2026 — 7,089 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,089 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,097 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,180 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,184 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,187 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,114 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,101 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,071 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,043 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,827 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,730 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,662 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,623 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -466. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,538–7,272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 17:416,623-39
13 Sept 2026, 05:396,662-68
9 Sept 2026, 05:206,730-97
3 Sept 2026, 11:026,827-216
30 Aug 2026, 23:157,043-28
27 Aug 2026, 16:557,071-30
25 Aug 2026, 00:437,101-13
21 Aug 2026, 09:257,114-73
18 Aug 2026, 08:337,187+3
15 Aug 2026, 02:147,184+4
11 Aug 2026, 15:147,180+83
8 Aug 2026, 08:557,097+8
7 Aug 2026, 19:477,089no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:327,089first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 28 June 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,138 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
51845.5%
😭18516.3%
😢14212.5%
🤔12010.5%
🤯1129.84%
💔615.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2025 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 25 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kiruhaprobiv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2025 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,260 views13 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026

Залил гордость казани в новый твинк бесплатно фулл видосы https://t.me/+oGSLymhAib83ZGJi

8😭5

20 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC≈1,560 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Вроде выжили утренняя пачка @kevinmakalister - Элджей @delqkeee - Марк Буллах @Sendbeats - Лил кристалл @bloodbloodhero - код80 @marinmocanu - Мармок @dukenukem666 - Клоукома @zzzgoto - Булкин @chriskomstok - Эксайл

10😭5🤔3💔2🤯2😢1

19 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,580 views73 reactionsread 20 August 2026

навсякий очистил канал

😭58😢64💔3🤔2

19 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈2,680 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

чуваки кароч мне тип каналы банит за то что обиделся на меня по причине которой он незнает так что завтра может не быть этого канала чтобы не потерять меня подписывайтесь без шуток рофлов и тдтп прикиньте воркать год и тип приходит вот так блокает все чат и другие мои каналы не ищите они в блоке https://t.me/+9__CpNi9JWQ2N2Uy

25😢12🤯3

16 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,850 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Новый нямням Анны Асти вкусняшка во втором канале https://t.me/+0N9hcubvFyk0ZGYx

🤔4

31 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC≈8,120 views112 reactionsread 18 August 2026

бля буду андрей смаев - @blaksxyandrew

😢72💔15😭12🤔74🤯2

25 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC≈11,600 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

scally milano :@hellokittysoulja NEWLIGHTCHILD: нажмите Kussia: @kussiaTM Дудь: @duddudduddud Егорик: @egorshkreddddd Boombl4: @Boombl4cs nkeeei: @nnnkkkeee111 Ганвест: @sexxmujchina Стопбан: @x10101011001 ALOHADANCE: @thienlaox21 стрыкало: @nwhrby000111

🤯8💔32

23 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC≈10,900 views33 reactionsread 18 August 2026

андрей смаев делает грязуку с женой смотреть - кирюха слиу видосоу https://t.me/+0N9hcubvFyk0ZGYx

😭25💔3🤔2😢21

19 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC≈11,100 views21 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Там розыгрыш будет на номера чуваки я бы сабнулся на вашем месте

🤔144💔3

19 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC≈10,400 views23 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Красивые eSIM-номера уже в продаже! Ищешь номер, который легко запомнить и приятно использовать? У нас есть красивые комбинации в форматах: +7 999 999 ХХХХ +7 999 999 9ХХХ Что получаешь? • Номер становится твоим, а не одноразовым виртуальным. • Больше приватности и анонимности. • Подходит для регистрации в различных сервисах и использования как обычный мобильный номер. • Быстрое получение и активация. Выделяйся

🤯14💔54

18 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC≈8,960 views21 reactionsread 18 August 2026

@hellokittysoulja - scally milano @svyatoirafsimons - baby cute @threedaysraindamn - три дня дождя @YOURBOSS228 - heronwater @sanyanegay - харчевников @bloodrayneceo - фортуна812 @vladkuertov - влад куертов @notatwole - tatwole @saymonsad - frametamer @naturenaturenaturenature - Данон

11😭7🤔3

18 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC≈8,640 views30 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Чуваки ща дропну пост с юзами Тут Мартину скелетон сити палец отху#ли Кирюха слив - во второй ТГК залил

28😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @kiruhaprobiv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кирюха” (@kiruhaprobiv), 6,623 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiruhaprobiv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.