Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hammasi kitob haqida

Channel

Hammasi kitob haqida

@kitoblarhaqida

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

783subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001480206347
TypeChannel
Username@kitoblarhaqida
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kitoblarhaqida

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

72978375616 August 2026 — 729 subscribers16 August 2026 — 729 subscribers17 August 2026 — 745 subscribers25 August 2026 — 751 subscribers31 August 2026 — 750 subscribers9 September 2026 — 775 subscribers15 September 2026 — 783 subscribers16 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 30 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 721–791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:37783+8
9 Sept 2026, 03:16775+25
31 Aug 2026, 13:13750-1
25 Aug 2026, 13:14751+6
17 Aug 2026, 12:11745+16
16 Aug 2026, 22:00729no change
16 Aug 2026, 21:45729first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 15s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

789 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21126.7%
🤣14017.7%
🔥13016.5%
👍10913.8%
😁9612.2%
😢556.97%
🥰263.30%
🎉141.77%
🤩60.76%
👏20.253%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 789 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kitoblarhaqida. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC≈1,090 views49 reactions3 Starsread 16 August 2026

#shukr Quduqdaman, lekin Yusuf emasman. Ammo Yusufning Robbi mening ham Robbim.

👍20🔥1312🤩2🥰2

13 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC593 views48 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Rabiul avval oyi - Rasululloh sollallohu alayhi vasallam tug’ilgan oy muborak bo’lsin!🕌

25🎉14🔥5👍2🤩2

12 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC673 views32 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#manhaj Insonning yaqin kishisi yoki biror tanishi vafot etadigan bo’lsa, avvalo, u bilan bo’lgan eng oxirgi muloqoti, eng oxirgi chiroyli lahzalarni eslaydi. Shundan kelib chiqib, Payg’ambarimiz alayhissalomning har bir namozni eng oxirgisidek o’qishni nasihat qilganlari kabi har bir kishi bilan ham oxirgi marta muloqot qilayotgandek munosabatda bo’lish hayotning ma’no-mazmunini tubdan o’zgartiradi, kimdandir ayri

17👍11🔥4

9 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC692 views71 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#tavsiya😅 Agar senga kimdir ozor beruvchi so’z otsa, sen unga atirgullarni otgin… …vazasi bilan albatta… …stolni ham unutma😌

🤣58😁103

6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC≈1,050 views31 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#qoida Ta’til - ilmdan dam oladigan emas, balki ilmda ziyodalik hosil qiladigan fursat. Ilm talabida yuradigan yigitlardan biri qachon ta’til yoki dam olish kuni beriladigan bo’lsa, kitob javonining oldiga kelar, agar dam olish kuni ikki kun bo’lsa, shu muddatda o’qib chiqishi mumkin bo’lgan kichik risola tanlardi. Agar ta’til uzoqroq davom etsa, shunga yarasha kitob tanlar edi. Ta’tilning o’ziga xosligi shundaki

18🔥8👍5

1 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,640 views27 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#voqelik Hozirgi zamonda o’zimizni qo’rishga va Allohdan panoh tilashga har doimgidan ham muhtojroqmiz. Zero, qalblarda Alloh taolodan rozilik hissi ozaydi, moddiyat uchun adovat qilish va unga kuchli xohish ommalashdi. Mol-mulkda boshqalarga qarab yashash, yaqinlar bilan ham, begonalar bilan ham o’zini solishtirish kuchaydi. Turli ijtimoiy tarmoq vositalaridagi holatlar voqelik deb qabul qilinmoqda. Bugun odamlar

👍87😢7🔥5

27 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,010 views38 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#tajriba Odam har safar buyuklarning huzuriga borganida, buyuk manzillarda bo’lganida ko’proq o’qib-o’rganmagani, ilm izlamay o’tkazgan vaqtlari uchun nadomat chekadi. Qani endi shu inson yoki makon yoxud hodisa haqida ko’proq bilganimda, maza qilib ziyorat qilgan bo’lardim, his-tuyg’ularim yanada ko’tarinki bo’lardi, deydi o’ziga o’zi. Xullas, vaqtida qadrlanmagan ne’matning kemtigi albatta kelajakda bo’y ko’rsat

👍16😢10🔥93

24 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,320 views49 reactions3 Starsread 16 August 2026

Bugun Payg’ambarimiz alayhissalomga nechta salavot aytdingiz?

😢2116🔥9👍3

22 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,220 views31 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026

#himmat Buyuk tobeiy Masruq (vaf. hij. 62) Qur’onning birgina oyati tafsirini o’rganish uchun Basraga safar qildi. Basraga yetib kelgach, u kishi izlab kelgan olimning Shomga safar qilganini xabar berdilar. Masruq darhol narsalarini hozirlab, Shomga yo’l oldi. _____________________ Ular va bizning davrimizdagi ne’matlar tafovuti ajoyib-a?! Hozir hamma oyat tafsiri ma’lum, kitoblar to’lib-toshib yotibdi. Biz esa o

😢178🔥6

20 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC≈1,050 views81 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#araz Osh qiling, deb aytmadi, lekin guruchning yaxshi navidan uyga olib bordi. Buni tushundi va tuxum solib, osh qildi. Uyda go'sht yo'q edi, demadi. Xulosa: Gaplashmasdan yashash mumkin, lekin go'shtsiz osh yeyishga ham tayyor turish kerak.😅

🤣50😁17👍86

18 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,340 views52 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#تنبيه Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda chiroyli so'zlar yozilgan rasmlar yoki chiroyli gaplar aytilgan videolarda er va ayol yonma-yon, er imom bo'lib namoz o'qiyotgan holatlar ko'zga tushib turadi. Aslida erkak va ayolning bunday shaklda namoz o'qishlari durustmi? Hanafiy fiqhiga ko'ra, agar namozda erkak kishi bitta yoki bir necha ayollarga imomlik qilsa, ayollar safi to'liq bir saf orqada bo'lishi lozim. Ya'ni erkakning q

👍21😁149🔥8

17 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC944 views17 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Kim birinchi o’qib, ma’no tarjimasini yozadi?

9🔥6👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kitoblarhaqida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hammasi kitob haqida” (@kitoblarhaqida), 783 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitoblarhaqida.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.