Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for литлкитти лайф

Channel

литлкитти лайф

@kittyistaking

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,741subscribers

-481 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002594510944
TypeChannel
Username@kittyistaking
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kittyistaking

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,74115,22214,981.57 August 2026 — 15,222 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,222 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,218 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,190 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,162 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,133 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,114 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,100 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,048 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,998 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,001 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,986 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,996 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,982 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,994 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,973 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,939 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,922 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,918 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,903 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,893 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,887 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,883 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,877 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,862 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,841 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,834 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,918 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,865 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,847 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,858 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,821 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,808 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,741 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,669–15,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:5614,741-67
16 Sept 2026, 22:3914,808-13
15 Sept 2026, 01:1714,821-37
13 Sept 2026, 10:1614,858+11
11 Sept 2026, 16:2114,847-18
9 Sept 2026, 00:5814,865-53
5 Sept 2026, 18:1614,918+84
3 Sept 2026, 18:3814,834-7
2 Sept 2026, 10:2414,841-21
1 Sept 2026, 06:5714,862-15
31 Aug 2026, 06:4614,877-6
30 Aug 2026, 05:0614,883-4
29 Aug 2026, 06:5414,887-6
28 Aug 2026, 09:2214,893-10
27 Aug 2026, 05:4614,903-15
26 Aug 2026, 05:5614,918-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:0414,922-17
23 Aug 2026, 23:3914,939-34
22 Aug 2026, 07:5714,973-21
20 Aug 2026, 20:0414,994first reading

Engagement

103 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.4%
avg views ÷ 14,741 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,990
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 103 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held103 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total76,940
Reactions total1,080
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,828 reactions across 103 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,15146.1%
🥴6389.34%
🔥5437.95%
🤣3735.46%
🍓3495.11%
💘2293.35%
👍1962.87%
🥰1792.62%
😁1672.45%
❤‍🔥1642.40%
🍌1452.12%
😭1171.71%
💋1041.52%
🤯640.937%
💊570.835%
😱400.586%
😐390.571%
🤔270.395%
🍾220.322%
🥱210.308%
25 further kinds2032.97%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,828 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC≈3,230 views148 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

такой вот епта shein haul 🐈 первый костюм чисто бьянка цензори тайп щит (муж с биполяркой идет в комплекте) второй купила для goth LARP образов а третий топ заказала только потому что мне понравился его цвет, в целом все вещи оч мили :3

🔥6954❤‍🔥17🍓6🍌1🥰1

2 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC≈3,540 views129 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

сисюлики писюлики

78👍26🔥19😱4🍓2

1 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC≈4,330 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

как же хорошо смотреть на контент, а еще лучше - его продавать! 🤑 да-да, снова открываем набор чаттеров : рады новичкам и опытным ребятам! бесплатное обучение, сильная команда и типажные модели - что еще нужно для старта с нами? еще у нас есть реферальная программа, чтобы ТЫ мог работать вместе с друзьями - получаешь 50$ за каждого, кто остается с нами! бери компьютер, заполняй заявку к @onlyfansfanslymg, приводи

14🤣5💘2👍1💊1

31 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈4,730 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

закупили корзинку на неделю ~ 150$ это значит что можно успешно продолжать отсиживаться дома (мы с любимым в последнее время достаточно пассивные + в работе) а ваще он недавно решил перейти на темную сторону (колоться в жопу) а это значит что придется становиться материал вайф и начинать готовить по КБЖУ пс: я относительно скоро поправлюсь + пройдут месячные и я шурую в зал, уже оплатила ведение у своего старого тр

37💘1

31 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈4,720 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026

хочу взять на полное продюсирование модель которая разделит мои артхаусные NSFW идеи для контента / фембой mtf желательно практикующую анальный / вагинальный фистинг пишите в коммы

😁30🥴249💘2🍓1

30 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈5,380 views136 reactionsread 3 September 2026

поймала себя на мысли, что единственное наше с любимым переживание касающееся наших отношений - чья-то абсолютно случайная/внезапная смерть считаю так должно быть у всех

89❤‍🔥28🍓19

29 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC≈6,510 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026

как же я ненавижу болеть, сижу ща в лобби своего жк жду доставку капель для носа вообще нихуя не соображаю

41🍓15

28 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈7,130 views109 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

шейн монстр… распаковку делаем?

💘6840❤‍🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈13,100 views244 reactionsread 3 September 2026

люди которые распространяют / ищут / продают видео с казанского коттеджа / шутят про пантеру - аморальные уебки и вы не докажете мне обратного

149🤣47👍32🥰13🍓3

24 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC≈9,470 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

let them cook 🧑‍🍳 приготовили для вас чета интересное / все превью тут 👉🏻 click click click

55

23 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈14,800 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

minoxidil вошел в чат 💬

41🤣22🥴9🍓4

23 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC≈8,610 views92 reactionsread 3 September 2026

мы возвращаемся в каменный век качалки где вес и валидность имеют только те, у кого высокие силовые надеюсь, люди которые руководствуются подобным методом оценки умрут в луже собственной мочи и кала

77👏15

Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @kittyistaking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“литлкитти лайф” (@kittyistaking), 14,741 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kittyistaking.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.