Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,669–15,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 05:56
14,741
-67
16 Sept 2026, 22:39
14,808
-13
15 Sept 2026, 01:17
14,821
-37
13 Sept 2026, 10:16
14,858
+11
11 Sept 2026, 16:21
14,847
-18
9 Sept 2026, 00:58
14,865
-53
5 Sept 2026, 18:16
14,918
+84
3 Sept 2026, 18:38
14,834
-7
2 Sept 2026, 10:24
14,841
-21
1 Sept 2026, 06:57
14,862
-15
31 Aug 2026, 06:46
14,877
-6
30 Aug 2026, 05:06
14,883
-4
29 Aug 2026, 06:54
14,887
-6
28 Aug 2026, 09:22
14,893
-10
27 Aug 2026, 05:46
14,903
-15
26 Aug 2026, 05:56
14,918
-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:04
14,922
-17
23 Aug 2026, 23:39
14,939
-34
22 Aug 2026, 07:57
14,973
-21
20 Aug 2026, 20:04
14,994
first reading
Engagement
103 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
47.4%
avg views ÷ 14,741 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,990
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 103 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
103 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
76,940
Reactions total
1,080
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,828 reactions across 103 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,151
46.1%
🥴
638
9.34%
🔥
543
7.95%
🤣
373
5.46%
🍓
349
5.11%
💘
229
3.35%
👍
196
2.87%
🥰
179
2.62%
😁
167
2.45%
❤🔥
164
2.40%
🍌
145
2.12%
😭
117
1.71%
💋
104
1.52%
🤯
64
0.937%
💊
57
0.835%
😱
40
0.586%
😐
39
0.571%
🤔
27
0.395%
🍾
22
0.322%
🥱
21
0.308%
25 further kinds
203
2.97%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,828 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
такой вот епта shein haul 🐈
первый костюм чисто бьянка цензори тайп щит (муж с биполяркой идет в комплекте)
второй купила для goth LARP образов
а третий топ заказала только потому что мне понравился его цвет, в целом все вещи оч мили :3
как же хорошо смотреть на контент, а еще лучше - его продавать! 🤑
да-да, снова открываем набор чаттеров : рады новичкам и опытным ребятам!
бесплатное обучение, сильная команда и типажные модели - что еще нужно для старта с нами?
еще у нас есть реферальная программа, чтобы ТЫ мог работать вместе с друзьями - получаешь 50$ за каждого, кто остается с нами!
бери компьютер, заполняй заявку к @onlyfansfanslymg, приводи …
закупили корзинку на неделю ~ 150$
это значит что можно успешно продолжать отсиживаться дома (мы с любимым в последнее время достаточно пассивные + в работе) а ваще он недавно решил перейти на темную сторону (колоться в жопу) а это значит что придется становиться материал вайф и начинать готовить по КБЖУ
пс: я относительно скоро поправлюсь + пройдут месячные и я шурую в зал, уже оплатила ведение у своего старого тр…
хочу взять на полное продюсирование модель которая разделит мои артхаусные NSFW идеи для контента / фембой mtf
желательно практикующую анальный / вагинальный фистинг
пишите в коммы
поймала себя на мысли, что единственное наше с любимым переживание касающееся наших отношений - чья-то абсолютно случайная/внезапная смерть
считаю так должно быть у всех
мы возвращаемся в каменный век качалки где вес и валидность имеют только те, у кого высокие силовые
надеюсь, люди которые руководствуются подобным методом оценки умрут в луже собственной мочи и кала
❤77👏15
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @kittyistaking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“литлкитти лайф” (@kittyistaking), 14,741 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kittyistaking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.