#币安 币安预计45小时内恢复提款,已冻结约30亿美元资产 初步调查显示安全事件源于被入侵的笔记本电脑及多个入侵点。币安称此为复杂攻击,正与执法部门协调。损失由SAFU基金及公司资金承担,用户资金安全。 提款预计45小时内恢复,充值不受影响。暂停提款后资金外流已停止,已冻结约30亿美元受影响资产,后续将通过官方渠道更新。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130

Channel
头条日报
@kk298
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
45,587subscribers
+32,097 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001835317942 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kk298 |
| Description | 😃广告位招商 : @kk130 ✈️七星海扶手交流群:@QXH177 💎七星海二手交易 :@QXH14 ✅ 新闻联盟 :@xw179 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kk298 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 45,587 | +5,352 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 40,235 | +624 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:11 | 39,611 | -565 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 40,176 | -1,036 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:29 | 41,212 | -560 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 41,772 | -932 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:08 | 42,704 | -505 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 43,209 | -1,061 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 44,270 | -844 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 45,114 | -817 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 45,931 | -812 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 46,743 | -750 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 05:29 | 47,493 | -869 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 48,362 | -220 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 48,582 | -923 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 49,505 | -1,947 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 51,452 | -1,622 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 00:19 | 53,074 | -63 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 23:20 | 53,137 | -167 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 53,304 | first reading |
Engagement
1,534 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.39%
- avg views ÷ 45,587 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 178
- 711 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 711
- of 1,534 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 711 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,534 (6 August 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 126,451 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈13,700
- Videos
- ≈2,090
- Links
- ≈137
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 16m
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 232 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#网友投稿:缅甸掸邦105码园区遭空袭,狗推撤离,遗留物资被当地人哄抢。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#柬埔寨新闻 木牌当局联合中国警方突查赌场及住宅,疑涉科技诈骗窝点 今日上午,柬埔寨柴桢省巴域市(Bavet City)执法部门联合中国警方,检查多处赌场及住宅。据悉,该地点曾被犯罪团伙用作科技诈骗藏身及活动场所。行动中,中方人员持续监控相关窝点,并展开深入调查。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#柬埔寨资讯 前副省长伙同翻译骗中国商人120万美元,上诉被驳,实刑3年 金边上诉法院驳回磅士卑省前副省长诈骗案翻译孟萨伦的上诉,维持原判。孟萨伦因协助两名中国投资人被骗120万美元,获刑5年(缓刑2年),实刑3年。 涉案人员: 1. 实居省前副省长邓武迪(57岁); 2. 前军官海夫孔(46岁); 3. 翻译孟萨伦。 三人均被判5年监禁及罚款1000万瑞尔,罪名包括滥用职权、伪造文件等。法院责令赔偿投资人李某40万美元、潘某120万美元。 反腐败机构通报,三人收钱后承诺办理锡矿开采许可证,实则伪造文件。孟萨伦庭审承认担任翻译但否认造假,请求减刑至18个月。法院认定原审正确,驳回请求。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#国际新闻 东南亚电信网络诈骗规模显著。根据美国国务院发布的数据,2025年美国民众因东南亚犯罪组织实施的网络诈骗行为,累计损失至少182亿美元。 诈骗手法涵盖虚假加密货币投资、网络交友诈骗以及冒充执法人员等类型。菲律宾总统反有组织犯罪委员会前发言人温斯顿·卡西奥对此提出警示,指出即便菲律宾已全面禁止POGO(在线博彩),部分相关犯罪网络仍可能转入地下,利用住宅、公寓及商业楼宇继续运作。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#8号园区的故事:“他们进来强奸我时,保安就在门口守着” 化名玛雅(Maia)的女子称,原去柬埔寨酒店工作,实被送入“8号园区”电诈窝点。入园即见穿黑制服、部分蒙面的保安。随后她被两名保安带至办公室,在园区老板要求下签署合同,被迫从事针对美国人的网络诈骗。 因未达业绩,她被关入黑屋,先后三次遭园区管理人员强奸。每次作案时,保安均开门并在门外站岗。 “他们进来强奸我时,保安就在门口守着。”玛雅说。 她还回忆,该园区保安配备电击警棍、手枪,部分人携带威力更大的枪支。国际特赦组织采访了三名曾在该园区遭强奸的幸存者。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#中国公安部工作组视察巴域电诈园区 中国公安部工作组近日赴柬埔寨柴桢省巴域市(木牌),实地考察原电信诈骗园区。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#泰国新闻 3名中国男子险被绑架至缅甸! 10月29日凌晨,泰国来兴府警方拦截可疑车辆,救出3名遭绑架的中国男子,逮捕4名泰国籍嫌犯。3名男子被蒙眼、戴手铐并捆绑双腿,车内查获电击设备。初步调查显示,3人持合法护照入境,疑似遭诱骗控制,原计划经湄索边境送往缅甸电诈团伙。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#东南亚情感:2026年运势不佳,年初在老街被拘,花费近30万脱身 购车后经介绍认识一名做扶手生意的女性,初期花费少,稳定后我上交全部收入。两个月后,因业务资金滞留需回款,她提出去木姐“做客”并直接前往。她称在木姐工作一月,我同意。三天后她谎称微信被盗(实为删除我及周围人),仅通过纸飞机、抖音断续联系,拒接视频。承诺一月归期未现,中途失踪两天,我多方打听无果,得知她在木姐安好。 此人满口谎言,行事无底线。发此文提醒木姐及东南亚同胞避坑。现要求当面解释,否则将公布详细证据,希望体面结束。勿以“东南亚男人没格局”为借口,核心在于对方态度与底线。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#币圈新闻: Ledger“投毒”危机蔓延至新加坡核心线下零售网 继马来西亚经销商售出的 Ledger 被植入 LTE/eSIM 监控模块后,新加坡警方确认本地案件手法相同。早在 9 月 10 日,新加坡已出现受害者,确认损失约 270 万美元(350 万新币)。 前 Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès 拆解证实,樟宜机场 Metapod 及本地 Challenger 售出的全新设备中均发现间谍电路板。硬件钱包底层安全已无法保证。 建议:近期非官网直发设备勿通电初始化;已使用设备须立即迁移至绝对干净的新设备,生成新助记词并转移资产。 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#网友投稿:带朋友按摩,越南妹起初正经,后画风突变。朋友险失贞,提醒男人外出需自保😂 ✅ 投稿 @kk130
#妙瓦底猪仔:我们连被遣返的资格都没有 9月,13人被抓入妙瓦底临时拘留中心(俗称集中营)。 关押前半月,经当地军人及疑似中方人员采集身份信息后,多数人预期10月左右遣返回国。 我们本身属半受害者,被迫从事电诈。遣返虽面临1-2年刑罚,但优于在妙瓦底终日惊惧做电诈。 10月中旬,13人被分两组,由当地民兵驱车押送。我们组8人,车程约3小时。下车后发现接应者竟是原电诈公司领导,民兵将我组送回电诈公司新址继续作业。 公司领导接收后即刻安排复工,要求15日内赚回公司赎回我们的成本。若逾期未达标,公司将以2倍以上价格将我组卖往更恶劣的“噶腰子”公司。妙瓦底遣返集中营形同虚设,被缅兵抓入关押后仍被公司买回继续开工。这是否意味着我们罪行未达遣返标准? ✅ 投稿 @kk130
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,534 posts we hold for @kk298. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@QXH14 · 6,646322 posts新闻联盟导航
@xw234 · 7,491322 postsY3国际 官方频道
@ai038 · 1,48620 postsY3国际 u台 福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@Y3111111 · 1,67820 postsY3国际推单频道
@Y31133 · 1,86420 posts122体育福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@QSTY288 · 4,11712 posts122体育 世界杯 体育推单 足球推单
@sjb0101 · 1,81112 postsM8.com-国际官方频道.
@m8baby04 · 1,4915 posts182体育福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@lz5288 · 4,0273 posts182体育 足球推单 🫥 足球比赛 体育电竞
@OB200000 · 1,4303 posts东南亚大事件-情报局
@p5559 · 185,1341 post2028234.COM-2028体育官方频道
@pg121 · 8,6081 post【2028126.com】赌王之王
@pgdzr · 6,4551 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“头条日报” (@kk298), 45,587 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kk298.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.