Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 合肥观察👀🥇-聊天推荐群

Supergroup

合肥观察👀🥇-聊天推荐群

@kk37373737

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

14,564members

+2,186 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

389 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003844922115
TypeSupergroup
Username@kk37373737
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kk37373737

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,37814,56413,47127 August 2026 — 12,378 members28 August 2026 — 12,537 members29 August 2026 — 12,880 members30 August 2026 — 13,007 members31 August 2026 — 13,383 members1 September 2026 — 13,662 members2 September 2026 — 13,493 members3 September 2026 — 13,479 members6 September 2026 — 13,697 members9 September 2026 — 13,963 members11 September 2026 — 14,076 members13 September 2026 — 14,152 members15 September 2026 — 14,240 members16 September 2026 — 14,397 members19 September 2026 — 14,564 members27 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 23 days, net +2,186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,050–14,892 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:0114,564+167
16 Sept 2026, 23:0114,397+157
15 Sept 2026, 03:0114,240+88
13 Sept 2026, 15:0114,152+76
11 Sept 2026, 17:3814,076+113
9 Sept 2026, 04:3513,963+266
6 Sept 2026, 00:0013,697+218
3 Sept 2026, 19:5613,479-14
2 Sept 2026, 09:3413,493-169
1 Sept 2026, 07:4513,662+279
31 Aug 2026, 04:3413,383+376
30 Aug 2026, 01:0313,007+127
29 Aug 2026, 02:5712,880+343
28 Aug 2026, 01:0412,537+159
27 Aug 2026, 12:0312,378first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 27 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“合肥观察👀🥇-聊天推荐群” (@kk37373737), 14,564 members as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kk37373737.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.